剖宫产术后早期皮肤接触对产妇心理状态和纯母乳喂养率的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照研究

Luan-ying Tian, H. Li, Zhen Wang
{"title":"剖宫产术后早期皮肤接触对产妇心理状态和纯母乳喂养率的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照研究","authors":"Luan-ying Tian, H. Li, Zhen Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2020.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the influence of early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) after cesarean section on maternal psychological status and the rate of exclusive breastfeeding. \n \n \nMethods \nThis was a prospective randomized controlled study enrolling 221 singleton pregnant women who underwent elected caesarean section at term in Shenzhen Nanshan Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital from August 1 to December 31, 2017. They were randomly divided into SSC group and control group. In the SSC group, naked infants were placed on the mothers' chests within 1 h after delivery for 1-2 h, while those in the control group received standard care. Clinical outcomes were compared between two groups, including the rate of exclusive breastfeeding and score of Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (BSES) and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at 72 h and 42 d after delivery, scores of Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (BAT) for the first breastfeeding, time to lactogenesis and successful rate of first breastfeeding. Two-independent sample t test, Chi-square test and binary logistic regression analysis were used as statistical methods. \n \n \nResults \nEventually, 210 puerperae were analyzed with 105 in each group. Twenty in the SSC group and 17 in the control group were lost to follow-up 42 d after delivery. The successful rate of first breastfeeding [77.1% (81/105) vs 59.1% (62/105), χ2=7.913, P=0.005], BAT scores (9.5±1.7 vs 8.6±1.4, t=4.115, P<0.001), the rate of lactation initiation ≤24 h after birth [41.0% (43/105) vs 12.4% (13/105), χ2=23.205, P<0.001], and exclusive breastfeeding rates [36.2% (38/105) vs 22.9% (24/105), χ2=4.486, P=0.034; 76.5% (65/85) vs 60.2% (63/88), χ2=5.261, P =0.022] and BESE scores (117.5±12.0 vs 111.8±22.3, t=2.100, P=0.037; 124.3±11.6 vs 113.1±19.0, t=4.710, P<0.001) at 72 h and 42 d after delivery were all higher in the SSC group than those in the control group. However, no statistically significant difference in EPDS scores was observed between the two groups at either 72 h or 42 d after delivery (5.4±3.5 vs 5.9±4.0, t=0.937, P=0.350; 7.0±3.7 vs 8.1±4.0, t=0.905, P=0.058). Binary logistic regression analysis showed early SSC was a protective factor for successful exclusive breastfeeding 42 d after delivery (OR=2.359, 95%CI: 1.173-4.743, P=0.016). \n \n \nConclusions \nEarly SSC after caesarean should be recommended as a usual clinical practice because it can improve maternal confidence on breastfeeding, shorten the time to lactogenesis and increase the successful rate of first breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding rate during puerperium. \n \n \nKey words: \nBreast feeding; Postpartum period; Self efficacy; Self-assessment; Assertiveness; Randomized controlled trial","PeriodicalId":52320,"journal":{"name":"中华围产医学杂志","volume":"23 1","pages":"105-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of early skin-to-skin contact after cesarean section on maternal psychological status and exclusive breastfeeding rate: a prospective randomized controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Luan-ying Tian, H. Li, Zhen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2020.02.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the influence of early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) after cesarean section on maternal psychological status and the rate of exclusive breastfeeding. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThis was a prospective randomized controlled study enrolling 221 singleton pregnant women who underwent elected caesarean section at term in Shenzhen Nanshan Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital from August 1 to December 31, 2017. They were randomly divided into SSC group and control group. In the SSC group, naked infants were placed on the mothers' chests within 1 h after delivery for 1-2 h, while those in the control group received standard care. Clinical outcomes were compared between two groups, including the rate of exclusive breastfeeding and score of Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (BSES) and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at 72 h and 42 d after delivery, scores of Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (BAT) for the first breastfeeding, time to lactogenesis and successful rate of first breastfeeding. Two-independent sample t test, Chi-square test and binary logistic regression analysis were used as statistical methods. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nEventually, 210 puerperae were analyzed with 105 in each group. Twenty in the SSC group and 17 in the control group were lost to follow-up 42 d after delivery. The successful rate of first breastfeeding [77.1% (81/105) vs 59.1% (62/105), χ2=7.913, P=0.005], BAT scores (9.5±1.7 vs 8.6±1.4, t=4.115, P<0.001), the rate of lactation initiation ≤24 h after birth [41.0% (43/105) vs 12.4% (13/105), χ2=23.205, P<0.001], and exclusive breastfeeding rates [36.2% (38/105) vs 22.9% (24/105), χ2=4.486, P=0.034; 76.5% (65/85) vs 60.2% (63/88), χ2=5.261, P =0.022] and BESE scores (117.5±12.0 vs 111.8±22.3, t=2.100, P=0.037; 124.3±11.6 vs 113.1±19.0, t=4.710, P<0.001) at 72 h and 42 d after delivery were all higher in the SSC group than those in the control group. However, no statistically significant difference in EPDS scores was observed between the two groups at either 72 h or 42 d after delivery (5.4±3.5 vs 5.9±4.0, t=0.937, P=0.350; 7.0±3.7 vs 8.1±4.0, t=0.905, P=0.058). Binary logistic regression analysis showed early SSC was a protective factor for successful exclusive breastfeeding 42 d after delivery (OR=2.359, 95%CI: 1.173-4.743, P=0.016). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nEarly SSC after caesarean should be recommended as a usual clinical practice because it can improve maternal confidence on breastfeeding, shorten the time to lactogenesis and increase the successful rate of first breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding rate during puerperium. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nBreast feeding; Postpartum period; Self efficacy; Self-assessment; Assertiveness; Randomized controlled trial\",\"PeriodicalId\":52320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华围产医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"105-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华围产医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2020.02.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华围产医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2020.02.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的探讨剖宫产术后早期皮肤接触对产妇心理状态和纯母乳喂养率的影响。方法采用前瞻性随机对照研究,纳入2017年8月1日至12月31日在深圳南山妇幼保健院接受择期剖宫产手术的221例单胎孕妇。随机分为SSC组和对照组。SSC组在分娩后1小时内将裸体婴儿放在母亲的胸部,持续1-2小时,而对照组则接受标准护理。比较两组的临床结果,包括纯母乳喂养率、产后72小时和42天的母乳喂养自我效能量表(BSES)和爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评分、首次母乳喂养的母乳喂养评估工具(BAT)评分、产乳时间和首次母乳喂养成功率。采用两个独立样本t检验、卡方检验和二元逻辑回归分析作为统计方法。结果分析210例产妇,每组105例。SSC组有20例和对照组有17例在分娩后42天失访。首次母乳喂养的成功率[77.1%(81/105)vs 59.1%(62/105),χ2=7.913,P=0.005],BAT评分(9.5±1.7 vs 8.6±1.4,t=4.115,P<0.001),出生后≤24 h开始泌乳率[41.0%(43/105)vs12.4%(13/105),χ=23.205,P<0.001],SSC组产后72小时和42天的纯母乳喂养率[36.2%(38/105)vs 22.9%(24/105),χ2=4.486,P=0.034;76.5%(65/85)vs 60.2%(63/88),χ0=5.261,P=0.022]和BESE评分(117.5±12.0 vs 111.8±22.3,t=2.100,P=0.037;124.3±11.6 vs 113.1±19.0,t=4.710,P<0.001)均高于对照组。然而两组在产后72小时或42天的EPDS评分均无统计学显著差异(5.4±3.5 vs 5.9±4.0,t=0.937,P=0.350;7.0±3.7 vs 8.1±4.0,t=0.905,P=0.058)。二元逻辑回归分析显示,早期SSC是产后42天成功纯母乳喂养的保护因素(or=2.359,95%CI:1.173-4.743,P=0.016)。结论剖宫产术后早期SSC可提高产妇对母乳喂养的信心,缩短产乳时间,提高首次母乳喂养成功率和产褥期纯母乳喂养率,因此应推荐将其作为临床常规做法。关键词:母乳喂养;产后;自我效能;自我评估;自信;随机对照试验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of early skin-to-skin contact after cesarean section on maternal psychological status and exclusive breastfeeding rate: a prospective randomized controlled study
Objective To investigate the influence of early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) after cesarean section on maternal psychological status and the rate of exclusive breastfeeding. Methods This was a prospective randomized controlled study enrolling 221 singleton pregnant women who underwent elected caesarean section at term in Shenzhen Nanshan Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital from August 1 to December 31, 2017. They were randomly divided into SSC group and control group. In the SSC group, naked infants were placed on the mothers' chests within 1 h after delivery for 1-2 h, while those in the control group received standard care. Clinical outcomes were compared between two groups, including the rate of exclusive breastfeeding and score of Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (BSES) and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at 72 h and 42 d after delivery, scores of Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (BAT) for the first breastfeeding, time to lactogenesis and successful rate of first breastfeeding. Two-independent sample t test, Chi-square test and binary logistic regression analysis were used as statistical methods. Results Eventually, 210 puerperae were analyzed with 105 in each group. Twenty in the SSC group and 17 in the control group were lost to follow-up 42 d after delivery. The successful rate of first breastfeeding [77.1% (81/105) vs 59.1% (62/105), χ2=7.913, P=0.005], BAT scores (9.5±1.7 vs 8.6±1.4, t=4.115, P<0.001), the rate of lactation initiation ≤24 h after birth [41.0% (43/105) vs 12.4% (13/105), χ2=23.205, P<0.001], and exclusive breastfeeding rates [36.2% (38/105) vs 22.9% (24/105), χ2=4.486, P=0.034; 76.5% (65/85) vs 60.2% (63/88), χ2=5.261, P =0.022] and BESE scores (117.5±12.0 vs 111.8±22.3, t=2.100, P=0.037; 124.3±11.6 vs 113.1±19.0, t=4.710, P<0.001) at 72 h and 42 d after delivery were all higher in the SSC group than those in the control group. However, no statistically significant difference in EPDS scores was observed between the two groups at either 72 h or 42 d after delivery (5.4±3.5 vs 5.9±4.0, t=0.937, P=0.350; 7.0±3.7 vs 8.1±4.0, t=0.905, P=0.058). Binary logistic regression analysis showed early SSC was a protective factor for successful exclusive breastfeeding 42 d after delivery (OR=2.359, 95%CI: 1.173-4.743, P=0.016). Conclusions Early SSC after caesarean should be recommended as a usual clinical practice because it can improve maternal confidence on breastfeeding, shorten the time to lactogenesis and increase the successful rate of first breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding rate during puerperium. Key words: Breast feeding; Postpartum period; Self efficacy; Self-assessment; Assertiveness; Randomized controlled trial
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华围产医学杂志
中华围产医学杂志 Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4446
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Expert consensus on breastfeeding in case of maternal infections Fifteen-minute consultation: ABCDE approach to nutritional assessment in preterm infants早产儿的15分钟营养评估法:ABCDE Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19: a systemic review Premature infant born to a convalescent mother with COVID-19 in mid-term pregnancy How to obtain evidence of vertical transmission of coronavirus according to serological test of specific IgM and IgG antibodies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1