提议、处置、证明:巴特、意向性与超文本文学小说

IF 1.4 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1080/13614568.2021.1906955
Samuel Brooker
{"title":"提议、处置、证明:巴特、意向性与超文本文学小说","authors":"Samuel Brooker","doi":"10.1080/13614568.2021.1906955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Hypertext has been described as embodying Roland Barthes' ideal text. This paper considers that association, and the relationship of each to literary theory's historical privileging of authorial intention over reader interpretation. Firstly it outlines the rise and fall of authorial intention in literary theory, culminating in Roland Barthes' 1967 essay The Death of the Author. Secondly, it challenges the relationship between anti-intentionalism and hypertext in three ways: by exploring hypertext as a dialectical situation, which places the reader in dialogue with the author; by challenging Barthes' galaxy of signifiers as an embodiment of links; and finally, by establishing a disciplinary emphasis on hermeneutics as intrinsically readerly in nature. The paper concludes by considering whether an intentionalist approach might in fact be the best fit for hypertext fiction.","PeriodicalId":54386,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia","volume":"27 1","pages":"6 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614568.2021.1906955","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposing, disposing, proving: Barthes, intentionalism, and hypertext literary fiction\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Brooker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13614568.2021.1906955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Hypertext has been described as embodying Roland Barthes' ideal text. This paper considers that association, and the relationship of each to literary theory's historical privileging of authorial intention over reader interpretation. Firstly it outlines the rise and fall of authorial intention in literary theory, culminating in Roland Barthes' 1967 essay The Death of the Author. Secondly, it challenges the relationship between anti-intentionalism and hypertext in three ways: by exploring hypertext as a dialectical situation, which places the reader in dialogue with the author; by challenging Barthes' galaxy of signifiers as an embodiment of links; and finally, by establishing a disciplinary emphasis on hermeneutics as intrinsically readerly in nature. The paper concludes by considering whether an intentionalist approach might in fact be the best fit for hypertext fiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"6 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614568.2021.1906955\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2021.1906955\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2021.1906955","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要超文本被认为是罗兰·巴特理想文本的具体体现。本文认为,这种关联及其与文学理论对作者意图凌驾于读者解释之上的历史特权的关系。首先,它概述了作者意图在文学理论中的兴衰,最终出现在罗兰·巴特1967年的散文《作者之死》中。其次,它从三个方面挑战了反意向主义与超文本之间的关系:将超文本作为一种辩证的情境来探索,使读者与作者对话;通过挑战巴特的能指星系作为链接的化身;最后,通过建立对解释学的学科强调,将其本质上理解为自然。本文最后考虑了意向主义方法是否真的最适合超文本小说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proposing, disposing, proving: Barthes, intentionalism, and hypertext literary fiction
ABSTRACT Hypertext has been described as embodying Roland Barthes' ideal text. This paper considers that association, and the relationship of each to literary theory's historical privileging of authorial intention over reader interpretation. Firstly it outlines the rise and fall of authorial intention in literary theory, culminating in Roland Barthes' 1967 essay The Death of the Author. Secondly, it challenges the relationship between anti-intentionalism and hypertext in three ways: by exploring hypertext as a dialectical situation, which places the reader in dialogue with the author; by challenging Barthes' galaxy of signifiers as an embodiment of links; and finally, by establishing a disciplinary emphasis on hermeneutics as intrinsically readerly in nature. The paper concludes by considering whether an intentionalist approach might in fact be the best fit for hypertext fiction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia
New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia (NRHM) is an interdisciplinary journal providing a focus for research covering practical and theoretical developments in hypermedia, hypertext, and interactive multimedia.
期刊最新文献
Geo-spatial hypertext in virtual reality: mapping and navigating global news event spaces User-centred collecting for emerging formats The evolution of the author—authorship and speculative worldbuilding in Johannes Heldén’s Evolution From “screen-as-writing” theory to Internet culturology. A French perspective on digital textualities Pasifika arts Aotearoa and Wikipedia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1