结果腹腔镜胆管入路治疗胆总管结石101例

B. Arnau, M. R. Blanco, Victor Molina Santos, Antonio Rabal Fueyo, Antonio Moral Duarte, S. Cabus
{"title":"结果腹腔镜胆管入路治疗胆总管结石101例","authors":"B. Arnau, M. R. Blanco, Victor Molina Santos, Antonio Rabal Fueyo, Antonio Moral Duarte, S. Cabus","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The optimal treatment for choledocholithiasis (CLT) is currently the subject of debate, as there is no clear evidence that a two-step (endoscopic plus surgical) approach is superior to a one-step surgical procedure. Materials and methods: We analyzed the results obtained from 101 consecutive patients diagnosed with CLT using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or computed tomography (CT) scan undergoing cholecystectomy and laparoscopic exploration of the bile duct, carried out at our center between 2006 and 2019. In this analysis, special emphasis was made on the permanent resolution of the CLT and the associated complications. Results: The mean surgical time was 142 ± 36.7 minutes. In patients with a CLT diagnostic test more than 7 days previously, the presence of CLT was checked using intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), which was negative in 25 % of patients, while in the rest, a primary exploration was performed using a choledochoscope via choledochotomy in 82.2 % of patients and via the transcystic approach in two cases. A T-tube drain was inserted in 18.9 % of patients. The conversion rate was 0.9 % , due to a technical difficulty in removing the CLT in one patient. The laparoscopic approach treated the CLT permanently in 97 / 101 cases (96 % ), while four patients (3.9 % ) required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) due to residual cholelithiasis. A total of 15.8 % of patients experienced a postoperative biliary fistula, which was resolved using conservative management in 86.7 % of them, while two patients required surgical treatment and insertion of a percutaneous drain, respectively. The average postoperative stay duration was 6.5 ± 7.3 days. None of the patients showed signs of biliary stricture in the long-term postoperative follow-up. Conclusion: In our experience, the laparoscopic approach for one-step elective treatment of CLT is a safe option, with a very small number of complications and satisfactory short- and long-term results. Furthermore, despite preoperative identification of CLT, it helped to avoid unnecessary exploration of the bile duct in 25 % of patients.","PeriodicalId":38741,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results Obtained with the Laparoscopic Approach to the Bile Duct for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis in 101 Cases\",\"authors\":\"B. Arnau, M. R. Blanco, Victor Molina Santos, Antonio Rabal Fueyo, Antonio Moral Duarte, S. Cabus\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The optimal treatment for choledocholithiasis (CLT) is currently the subject of debate, as there is no clear evidence that a two-step (endoscopic plus surgical) approach is superior to a one-step surgical procedure. Materials and methods: We analyzed the results obtained from 101 consecutive patients diagnosed with CLT using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or computed tomography (CT) scan undergoing cholecystectomy and laparoscopic exploration of the bile duct, carried out at our center between 2006 and 2019. In this analysis, special emphasis was made on the permanent resolution of the CLT and the associated complications. Results: The mean surgical time was 142 ± 36.7 minutes. In patients with a CLT diagnostic test more than 7 days previously, the presence of CLT was checked using intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), which was negative in 25 % of patients, while in the rest, a primary exploration was performed using a choledochoscope via choledochotomy in 82.2 % of patients and via the transcystic approach in two cases. A T-tube drain was inserted in 18.9 % of patients. The conversion rate was 0.9 % , due to a technical difficulty in removing the CLT in one patient. The laparoscopic approach treated the CLT permanently in 97 / 101 cases (96 % ), while four patients (3.9 % ) required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) due to residual cholelithiasis. A total of 15.8 % of patients experienced a postoperative biliary fistula, which was resolved using conservative management in 86.7 % of them, while two patients required surgical treatment and insertion of a percutaneous drain, respectively. The average postoperative stay duration was 6.5 ± 7.3 days. None of the patients showed signs of biliary stricture in the long-term postoperative follow-up. Conclusion: In our experience, the laparoscopic approach for one-step elective treatment of CLT is a safe option, with a very small number of complications and satisfactory short- and long-term results. Furthermore, despite preoperative identification of CLT, it helped to avoid unnecessary exploration of the bile duct in 25 % of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胆总管结石(CLT)的最佳治疗方法目前是争论的主题,因为没有明确的证据表明两步(内窥镜加手术)方法优于一步手术。材料和方法:我们分析了2006年至2019年在我中心进行胆囊切除术和腹腔镜胆管探查的101例连续使用磁共振胆管造影(MRCP)或计算机断层扫描(CT)诊断为CLT的患者的结果。在这个分析中,特别强调的是CLT的永久解决和相关的并发症。结果:平均手术时间为142±36.7 min。在接受CLT诊断检查超过7天的患者中,使用术中胆道造影(IOC)检查CLT的存在,25%的患者为阴性,而在其余患者中,82.2%的患者通过胆道切开术使用胆道镜进行初步探查,2例通过经囊入路。18.9%的患者插入t管引流。转换率为0.9%,由于技术上的困难,在一个病人去除CLT。101例患者中有97例(96%)采用腹腔镜入路永久治疗CLT, 4例(3.9%)患者因残余胆石症需要术后内镜逆行胆管造影术(ERCP)。15.8%的患者术后出现胆瘘,其中86.7%的患者采用保守治疗,2例患者分别需要手术治疗和经皮引流。术后平均住院时间为6.5±7.3天。术后长期随访无胆道狭窄征象。结论:根据我们的经验,腹腔镜下一步选择性治疗CLT是一种安全的选择,并发症很少,短期和长期效果令人满意。此外,尽管术前确定了CLT,但它有助于避免25%的患者不必要的胆管探查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Results Obtained with the Laparoscopic Approach to the Bile Duct for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis in 101 Cases
Background: The optimal treatment for choledocholithiasis (CLT) is currently the subject of debate, as there is no clear evidence that a two-step (endoscopic plus surgical) approach is superior to a one-step surgical procedure. Materials and methods: We analyzed the results obtained from 101 consecutive patients diagnosed with CLT using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or computed tomography (CT) scan undergoing cholecystectomy and laparoscopic exploration of the bile duct, carried out at our center between 2006 and 2019. In this analysis, special emphasis was made on the permanent resolution of the CLT and the associated complications. Results: The mean surgical time was 142 ± 36.7 minutes. In patients with a CLT diagnostic test more than 7 days previously, the presence of CLT was checked using intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), which was negative in 25 % of patients, while in the rest, a primary exploration was performed using a choledochoscope via choledochotomy in 82.2 % of patients and via the transcystic approach in two cases. A T-tube drain was inserted in 18.9 % of patients. The conversion rate was 0.9 % , due to a technical difficulty in removing the CLT in one patient. The laparoscopic approach treated the CLT permanently in 97 / 101 cases (96 % ), while four patients (3.9 % ) required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) due to residual cholelithiasis. A total of 15.8 % of patients experienced a postoperative biliary fistula, which was resolved using conservative management in 86.7 % of them, while two patients required surgical treatment and insertion of a percutaneous drain, respectively. The average postoperative stay duration was 6.5 ± 7.3 days. None of the patients showed signs of biliary stricture in the long-term postoperative follow-up. Conclusion: In our experience, the laparoscopic approach for one-step elective treatment of CLT is a safe option, with a very small number of complications and satisfactory short- and long-term results. Furthermore, despite preoperative identification of CLT, it helped to avoid unnecessary exploration of the bile duct in 25 % of patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical Aspects of the Possover LION Procedure: An Emerging Procedure for Recovery of Visceral Functions and Locomotion in Paraplegics Avoiding the Falciform Ligament Sign during the Intraoperative Cholangiogram A Study on Effects of Leaking Carbon Dioxide Gas on Surgeons during Laparoscopic Surgeries Comparison between Laparoscopic Ultrasound and Intraoperative Cholangiogram in Detection of Common Bile Duct Stones during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Cholelithiasis: A Prospective Study Short-term Outcome of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1