用他们自己的话说:学生对恢复性实践的看法

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Children & Schools Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI:10.1093/cs/cdaa011
Candra Skrzypek, Erin W. Bascug, Anna L. Ball, Wooksoo Kim, D. Elze
{"title":"用他们自己的话说:学生对恢复性实践的看法","authors":"Candra Skrzypek, Erin W. Bascug, Anna L. Ball, Wooksoo Kim, D. Elze","doi":"10.1093/cs/cdaa011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Restorative practices (RPs) are promising nonpunitive approaches to discipline in schools, yet researchers often overlook students’ perspectives. The current study used a mixed-methods approach to explore RP Circle experiences of urban, low-income, and predominantly Black middle school students with attention to the diversity of their experiences by grade level, race, and gender. Quantitative results indicated that younger students reported learning about their behavior by participating in RP Circles. In general, boys felt that Circles supported their nonviolent problem-solving skills more than girls did. Black girls were significantly less likely to endorse the effectiveness of RP Circles to help them solve problems without violence and help them learn about their behavior in comparison with girls of other racial or ethnic backgrounds. Qualitative findings highlighted the benefits of RP Circles in promoting communication, expressing thoughts and feelings, pers pective taking, and opportunity for learning. The study highlights the importance of approaching RP from an intersectional lens and integrating youths’ perspectives into programming.","PeriodicalId":35453,"journal":{"name":"Children & Schools","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cs/cdaa011","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Their Own Words: Student Perceptions of Restorative Practices\",\"authors\":\"Candra Skrzypek, Erin W. Bascug, Anna L. Ball, Wooksoo Kim, D. Elze\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cs/cdaa011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Restorative practices (RPs) are promising nonpunitive approaches to discipline in schools, yet researchers often overlook students’ perspectives. The current study used a mixed-methods approach to explore RP Circle experiences of urban, low-income, and predominantly Black middle school students with attention to the diversity of their experiences by grade level, race, and gender. Quantitative results indicated that younger students reported learning about their behavior by participating in RP Circles. In general, boys felt that Circles supported their nonviolent problem-solving skills more than girls did. Black girls were significantly less likely to endorse the effectiveness of RP Circles to help them solve problems without violence and help them learn about their behavior in comparison with girls of other racial or ethnic backgrounds. Qualitative findings highlighted the benefits of RP Circles in promoting communication, expressing thoughts and feelings, pers pective taking, and opportunity for learning. The study highlights the importance of approaching RP from an intersectional lens and integrating youths’ perspectives into programming.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children & Schools\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cs/cdaa011\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children & Schools\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdaa011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children & Schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdaa011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

恢复性实践(RP)是一种很有前途的非统一的学校纪律方法,但研究人员经常忽视学生的观点。目前的研究使用了一种混合方法来探索城市、低收入和以黑人为主的中学生的RP Circle经历,并注意到他们的经历在年级、种族和性别方面的多样性。定量结果表明,较年轻的学生报告说,他们通过参加RP圈子了解了自己的行为。总的来说,男孩觉得Circles比女孩更支持他们的非暴力解决问题的技能。与其他种族或族裔背景的女孩相比,黑人女孩不太可能认可RP Circles的有效性,即帮助她们在没有暴力的情况下解决问题,并帮助她们了解自己的行为。定性研究结果强调了RP圈子在促进沟通、表达思想和感受、前瞻性把握和学习机会方面的好处。该研究强调了从跨部门角度看待RP并将年轻人的观点纳入计划编制的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In Their Own Words: Student Perceptions of Restorative Practices
Restorative practices (RPs) are promising nonpunitive approaches to discipline in schools, yet researchers often overlook students’ perspectives. The current study used a mixed-methods approach to explore RP Circle experiences of urban, low-income, and predominantly Black middle school students with attention to the diversity of their experiences by grade level, race, and gender. Quantitative results indicated that younger students reported learning about their behavior by participating in RP Circles. In general, boys felt that Circles supported their nonviolent problem-solving skills more than girls did. Black girls were significantly less likely to endorse the effectiveness of RP Circles to help them solve problems without violence and help them learn about their behavior in comparison with girls of other racial or ethnic backgrounds. Qualitative findings highlighted the benefits of RP Circles in promoting communication, expressing thoughts and feelings, pers pective taking, and opportunity for learning. The study highlights the importance of approaching RP from an intersectional lens and integrating youths’ perspectives into programming.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Children & Schools
Children & Schools SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Children & Schools publishes professional materials relevant to social work services for children. The journal publishes articles on innovations in practice, interdisciplinary efforts, research, program evaluation, policy, and planning. Topics include student-authority relationships, multiculturalism, early intervention, needs assessment, violence, and ADHD. Children & Schools is a practitioner-to-practitioner resource.
期刊最新文献
Children & Schools From Intent to Impact: Building University-Assisted Community Schools in New Mexico School-Based Postvention Services: Exploring the Perspectives of Students Role of School Quality and Neighborhood Disadvantage in Educational Attainment: Do They Vary by Race? Schools and Juvenile Treatment Drug Courts: A Case Study on Treatment Access through Collaboration and Advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1