{"title":"现在来点完全不同的东西","authors":"S. Black, P. Bouillon","doi":"10.1163/9789004499423_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A pilot experiment was conducted at Dagstuhl using the 'Beyond program \n slicing' seminar attendees. Attendees were split into three groups: all \n were given the same program to understand and a list of program comprehension \n related questions to answer. Group one had only the source code, group two \n had the source code and the dynamic trace of the program, group three \n had the source and a control-flow graph of the program.","PeriodicalId":72483,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Medical Library Association","volume":"79 3 1","pages":"331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"And Now For Something Completely Different\",\"authors\":\"S. Black, P. Bouillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004499423_004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A pilot experiment was conducted at Dagstuhl using the 'Beyond program \\n slicing' seminar attendees. Attendees were split into three groups: all \\n were given the same program to understand and a list of program comprehension \\n related questions to answer. Group one had only the source code, group two \\n had the source code and the dynamic trace of the program, group three \\n had the source and a control-flow graph of the program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Medical Library Association\",\"volume\":\"79 3 1\",\"pages\":\"331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Medical Library Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004499423_004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004499423_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A pilot experiment was conducted at Dagstuhl using the 'Beyond program
slicing' seminar attendees. Attendees were split into three groups: all
were given the same program to understand and a list of program comprehension
related questions to answer. Group one had only the source code, group two
had the source code and the dynamic trace of the program, group three
had the source and a control-flow graph of the program.