对他人的要求:祖先和萨满如何治理卡拉哈里王朝的不透明

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Ethnos Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI:10.1080/00141844.2021.2007156
M. Laws
{"title":"对他人的要求:祖先和萨满如何治理卡拉哈里王朝的不透明","authors":"M. Laws","doi":"10.1080/00141844.2021.2007156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Among Jú|’hoànsi in the northern Kalahari, there are differences in the way people address their suspicions about what others might be thinking or feeling – in other words, in the way people confront the opacity of other minds. Among friends, playful forms of mockery allow people to express their suspicions or ill-feelings directly, without the fear of causing harm. Among relatives, by contrast, suspicions and ill-feelings are typically concealed. While people may talk about other minds when those minds are not around, they refrain from direct confrontation. To confront one’s relatives is to make them feel ‘pain in their hearts’, and to do so is to risk losing them to sickness or damaging enduring arrangements of care. Ancestors and shamans, who can see and hear more than others, play a crucial role here in governing opacity: exposing suspicions and ill-feelings when people feel they cannot speak of them.","PeriodicalId":47259,"journal":{"name":"Ethnos","volume":"88 1","pages":"702 - 723"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demanding from Others: How Ancestors and Shamans Govern Opacity in the Kalahari\",\"authors\":\"M. Laws\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00141844.2021.2007156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Among Jú|’hoànsi in the northern Kalahari, there are differences in the way people address their suspicions about what others might be thinking or feeling – in other words, in the way people confront the opacity of other minds. Among friends, playful forms of mockery allow people to express their suspicions or ill-feelings directly, without the fear of causing harm. Among relatives, by contrast, suspicions and ill-feelings are typically concealed. While people may talk about other minds when those minds are not around, they refrain from direct confrontation. To confront one’s relatives is to make them feel ‘pain in their hearts’, and to do so is to risk losing them to sickness or damaging enduring arrangements of care. Ancestors and shamans, who can see and hear more than others, play a crucial role here in governing opacity: exposing suspicions and ill-feelings when people feel they cannot speak of them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnos\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"702 - 723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2021.2007156\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2021.2007156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在卡拉哈里北部的Jú|'hoànsi中,人们对他人想法或感受的怀疑的处理方式存在差异,换句话说,人们面对他人思想不透明的方式也存在差异。在朋友之间,玩笑式的嘲笑可以让人们直接表达他们的怀疑或恶意,而不用担心造成伤害。相比之下,在亲属之间,猜疑和不愉快通常是隐藏的。当其他人不在身边时,人们可能会谈论他们的想法,但他们避免直接对抗。面对亲人是让他们感到“内心的痛苦”,这样做是冒着让他们生病或破坏持久护理安排的风险。祖先和萨满比其他人能看到和听到更多的东西,在治理不透明方面发挥着至关重要的作用:当人们觉得自己无法谈论怀疑和不良情绪时,他们会暴露出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Demanding from Others: How Ancestors and Shamans Govern Opacity in the Kalahari
ABSTRACT Among Jú|’hoànsi in the northern Kalahari, there are differences in the way people address their suspicions about what others might be thinking or feeling – in other words, in the way people confront the opacity of other minds. Among friends, playful forms of mockery allow people to express their suspicions or ill-feelings directly, without the fear of causing harm. Among relatives, by contrast, suspicions and ill-feelings are typically concealed. While people may talk about other minds when those minds are not around, they refrain from direct confrontation. To confront one’s relatives is to make them feel ‘pain in their hearts’, and to do so is to risk losing them to sickness or damaging enduring arrangements of care. Ancestors and shamans, who can see and hear more than others, play a crucial role here in governing opacity: exposing suspicions and ill-feelings when people feel they cannot speak of them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnos
Ethnos ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Ethnos is a peer-reviewed journal, which publishes original papers promoting theoretical, methodological and empirical developments in the discipline of socio-cultural anthropology. ethnos provides a forum where a wide variety of different anthropologies can gather together and enter into critical exchange.
期刊最新文献
Moses in Melanesia: Political Theology and Corpus Mysticum in Anthropology Elusive Gold and Uncertainty in Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Vernacular Humanitarianism in the Land of Associations: Negotiating Voluntary Organisation, Municipal Influence, and the Reception of Refugees among Venligboerne in Denmark Mining Rituals in Vital Spaces: The Cosmopolitics of Gold and the Precarity of Mine Closure in Ghana Mediums, Objects, and the Problem of Presence in the Western Himalayas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1