针刺治疗硬脑膜穿刺后头痛的随机临床试验

Sara Esmaeili , Ziba Aghsaeifard , Reza Alizadeh
{"title":"针刺治疗硬脑膜穿刺后头痛的随机临床试验","authors":"Sara Esmaeili ,&nbsp;Ziba Aghsaeifard ,&nbsp;Reza Alizadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.acu.2020.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is common among patients undergoing surgical procedures with spinal anesthesia. Conservative therapy might be associated with poor outcomes and delayed recovery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of acupuncture on post-dural puncture headache in comparison to conservative treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>In this single-blind randomized clinical trial 60 PDPH patients were divided into three groups. Group A received conservative pharmacological treatment, group B received acupuncture and group C received acupuncture sham. Outcomes were measured as pain intensity (visual analog scale VAS) and recovery time (time that pain falls from 4–7 to 0–3 on visual analog scale).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All three groups had no significant difference in terms of gender, age, and baseline pain (immediately after the surgery). Pain intensity decreased significantly in acupuncture group comparing to other groups. Furthermore, acupuncture reduced pain faster than other treatments. The overall general condition of the patients in group A and B was not significantly different, however significantly improved compared to group C.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Acupuncture therapy can be an effective method to manage PDPH in a shorter time and can reduce the need for epidural blood patch and pharmacological analgesia. However, further randomized trails are required to validate these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39495,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional de Acupuntura","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized clinical trial for the treatment of post-dural puncture headache with acupuncture\",\"authors\":\"Sara Esmaeili ,&nbsp;Ziba Aghsaeifard ,&nbsp;Reza Alizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acu.2020.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is common among patients undergoing surgical procedures with spinal anesthesia. Conservative therapy might be associated with poor outcomes and delayed recovery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of acupuncture on post-dural puncture headache in comparison to conservative treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>In this single-blind randomized clinical trial 60 PDPH patients were divided into three groups. Group A received conservative pharmacological treatment, group B received acupuncture and group C received acupuncture sham. Outcomes were measured as pain intensity (visual analog scale VAS) and recovery time (time that pain falls from 4–7 to 0–3 on visual analog scale).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All three groups had no significant difference in terms of gender, age, and baseline pain (immediately after the surgery). Pain intensity decreased significantly in acupuncture group comparing to other groups. Furthermore, acupuncture reduced pain faster than other treatments. The overall general condition of the patients in group A and B was not significantly different, however significantly improved compared to group C.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Acupuncture therapy can be an effective method to manage PDPH in a shorter time and can reduce the need for epidural blood patch and pharmacological analgesia. However, further randomized trails are required to validate these findings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Internacional de Acupuntura\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Internacional de Acupuntura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1887836920300892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional de Acupuntura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1887836920300892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

硬脊膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)在脊柱麻醉手术患者中很常见。保守治疗可能与预后不良和延迟恢复有关。本研究的目的是评估针刺治疗硬脑膜穿刺后头痛的效果,并与保守治疗进行比较。方法将60例PDPH患者随机分为3组。A组采用保守药物治疗,B组采用针刺治疗,C组采用假针刺治疗。结果测量为疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表VAS)和恢复时间(疼痛从视觉模拟量表4-7降至0-3的时间)。结果三组患者在性别、年龄、基线疼痛(术后即刻)方面无显著差异。针刺组疼痛强度较其他组明显降低。此外,针灸减轻疼痛的速度比其他治疗更快。A组与B组患者总体一般情况无显著差异,但较c组有明显改善。结论针刺治疗可在较短时间内有效控制PDPH,减少对硬膜外补血和药物镇痛的需要。然而,需要进一步的随机试验来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Randomized clinical trial for the treatment of post-dural puncture headache with acupuncture

Introduction

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is common among patients undergoing surgical procedures with spinal anesthesia. Conservative therapy might be associated with poor outcomes and delayed recovery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of acupuncture on post-dural puncture headache in comparison to conservative treatment.

Method

In this single-blind randomized clinical trial 60 PDPH patients were divided into three groups. Group A received conservative pharmacological treatment, group B received acupuncture and group C received acupuncture sham. Outcomes were measured as pain intensity (visual analog scale VAS) and recovery time (time that pain falls from 4–7 to 0–3 on visual analog scale).

Results

All three groups had no significant difference in terms of gender, age, and baseline pain (immediately after the surgery). Pain intensity decreased significantly in acupuncture group comparing to other groups. Furthermore, acupuncture reduced pain faster than other treatments. The overall general condition of the patients in group A and B was not significantly different, however significantly improved compared to group C.

Conclusion

Acupuncture therapy can be an effective method to manage PDPH in a shorter time and can reduce the need for epidural blood patch and pharmacological analgesia. However, further randomized trails are required to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Internacional de Acupuntura
Revista Internacional de Acupuntura Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
85 days
期刊介绍: La primera revista científica en español que permite estar al día sobre avances en terapias no convencionales, favoreciendo la renovación crítica y constante de los conocimientos ya adquiridos. Cuenta con los prestigiosos contenidos de la Deustche Zeitschrift f?r Akupunktur (DZA) alemana y artículos nacionales
期刊最新文献
Acupuncture in reproductive health: Evaluating its potential as an adjunct therapy Acupuncture and its potential in enhancing mental well-being for breast cancer survivors: An evidence-based insight Acupuncture in acute COVID-19 treatment: A review of clinical evidence Eficacia de la electroacupuntura y el masaje terapéutico sobre la cervicalgia secundaria a estrés y ansiedad. Revisión sistemática de la literatura Mecanismos moduladores neuroinmunológicos de la acupuntura en el tratamiento de ortodoncia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1