推断具有低阶条件独立性的动态基因调控网络-对该方法的评价

IF 0.9 4区 数学 Q3 Mathematics Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1515/sagmb-2020-0051
Hamda Ajmal, M. G. Madden
{"title":"推断具有低阶条件独立性的动态基因调控网络-对该方法的评价","authors":"Hamda Ajmal, M. G. Madden","doi":"10.1515/sagmb-2020-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Over a decade ago, Lèbre (2009) proposed an inference method, G1DBN, to learn the structure of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from high dimensional, sparse time-series gene expression data. Their approach is based on concept of low-order conditional independence graphs that they extend to dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs). They present results to demonstrate that their method yields better structural accuracy compared to the related Lasso and Shrinkage methods, particularly where the data is sparse, that is, the number of time measurements n is much smaller than the number of genes p. This paper challenges these claims using a careful experimental analysis, to show that the GRNs reverse engineered from time-series data using the G1DBN approach are less accurate than claimed by Lèbre (2009). We also show that the Lasso method yields higher structural accuracy for graphs learned from the simulated data, compared to the G1DBN method, particularly when the data is sparse ( n < < p $n{< }{< }p$ ). The Lasso method is also better than G1DBN at identifying the transcription factors (TFs) involved in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.","PeriodicalId":49477,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/sagmb-2020-0051","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inferring dynamic gene regulatory networks with low-order conditional independencies – an evaluation of the method\",\"authors\":\"Hamda Ajmal, M. G. Madden\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sagmb-2020-0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Over a decade ago, Lèbre (2009) proposed an inference method, G1DBN, to learn the structure of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from high dimensional, sparse time-series gene expression data. Their approach is based on concept of low-order conditional independence graphs that they extend to dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs). They present results to demonstrate that their method yields better structural accuracy compared to the related Lasso and Shrinkage methods, particularly where the data is sparse, that is, the number of time measurements n is much smaller than the number of genes p. This paper challenges these claims using a careful experimental analysis, to show that the GRNs reverse engineered from time-series data using the G1DBN approach are less accurate than claimed by Lèbre (2009). We also show that the Lasso method yields higher structural accuracy for graphs learned from the simulated data, compared to the G1DBN method, particularly when the data is sparse ( n < < p $n{< }{< }p$ ). The Lasso method is also better than G1DBN at identifying the transcription factors (TFs) involved in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/sagmb-2020-0051\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2020-0051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2020-0051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要十多年前,Lèbre(2009)提出了一种推理方法G1DBN,用于从高维、稀疏的时间序列基因表达数据中学习基因调控网络(GRN)的结构。他们的方法基于低阶条件独立图的概念,并将其扩展到动态贝叶斯网络(DBN)。他们提出的结果表明,与相关的拉索和收缩方法相比,他们的方法产生了更好的结构精度,特别是在数据稀疏的情况下,即时间测量的数量n远小于基因的数量p。本文通过仔细的实验分析对这些说法提出了质疑,以表明使用G1DBN方法从时间序列数据中反向工程的GRN不如Lèbre(2009)所声称的准确。我们还表明,与G1DBN方法相比,Lasso方法对从模拟数据中学习的图产生了更高的结构精度,特别是当数据稀疏时(n<本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inferring dynamic gene regulatory networks with low-order conditional independencies – an evaluation of the method
Abstract Over a decade ago, Lèbre (2009) proposed an inference method, G1DBN, to learn the structure of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from high dimensional, sparse time-series gene expression data. Their approach is based on concept of low-order conditional independence graphs that they extend to dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs). They present results to demonstrate that their method yields better structural accuracy compared to the related Lasso and Shrinkage methods, particularly where the data is sparse, that is, the number of time measurements n is much smaller than the number of genes p. This paper challenges these claims using a careful experimental analysis, to show that the GRNs reverse engineered from time-series data using the G1DBN approach are less accurate than claimed by Lèbre (2009). We also show that the Lasso method yields higher structural accuracy for graphs learned from the simulated data, compared to the G1DBN method, particularly when the data is sparse ( n < < p $n{< }{< }p$ ). The Lasso method is also better than G1DBN at identifying the transcription factors (TFs) involved in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology seeks to publish significant research on the application of statistical ideas to problems arising from computational biology. The focus of the papers should be on the relevant statistical issues but should contain a succinct description of the relevant biological problem being considered. The range of topics is wide and will include topics such as linkage mapping, association studies, gene finding and sequence alignment, protein structure prediction, design and analysis of microarray data, molecular evolution and phylogenetic trees, DNA topology, and data base search strategies. Both original research and review articles will be warmly received.
期刊最新文献
Empirically adjusted fixed-effects meta-analysis methods in genomic studies. A CNN-CBAM-BIGRU model for protein function prediction. A heavy-tailed model for analyzing miRNA-seq raw read counts. Flexible model-based non-negative matrix factorization with application to mutational signatures. Choice of baseline hazards in joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event cancer survival data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1