能源治理高层论坛的领导力:中国与俄罗斯的比较

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Post-Communist Economies Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI:10.1080/14631377.2021.1964742
J. Tosun, Karina Shyrokykh
{"title":"能源治理高层论坛的领导力:中国与俄罗斯的比较","authors":"J. Tosun, Karina Shyrokykh","doi":"10.1080/14631377.2021.1964742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates the participation of China and Russia in the Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM). In which policy initiatives have these two countries participated? In which initiatives have they taken the lead? Building on the club theory and international relations literature, we approach the research questions by offering an in-depth analysis of the policy dynamics inside the CEM. From a theoretical viewpoint, we posit that China has been more active in the CEM than Russia, which our empirical analysis confirms. However, Russia has also been involved in several CEM initiatives. Concerning leadership, China has demonstrated a greater interest in playing that role than Russia. We conclude that, overall, China makes a better strategic use of the CEM in terms of gathering information and developing networks with other member states as well as private actors in order to implement measures for overcoming the challenges of clean energy transition.","PeriodicalId":46517,"journal":{"name":"Post-Communist Economies","volume":"34 1","pages":"847 - 870"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leadership in high-level forums on energy governance: China and Russia compared\",\"authors\":\"J. Tosun, Karina Shyrokykh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14631377.2021.1964742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study investigates the participation of China and Russia in the Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM). In which policy initiatives have these two countries participated? In which initiatives have they taken the lead? Building on the club theory and international relations literature, we approach the research questions by offering an in-depth analysis of the policy dynamics inside the CEM. From a theoretical viewpoint, we posit that China has been more active in the CEM than Russia, which our empirical analysis confirms. However, Russia has also been involved in several CEM initiatives. Concerning leadership, China has demonstrated a greater interest in playing that role than Russia. We conclude that, overall, China makes a better strategic use of the CEM in terms of gathering information and developing networks with other member states as well as private actors in order to implement measures for overcoming the challenges of clean energy transition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Post-Communist Economies\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"847 - 870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Post-Communist Economies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1964742\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Communist Economies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1964742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本研究考察了中国和俄罗斯在清洁能源部长级会议(CEM)中的参与情况。两国参与了哪些政策倡议?他们在哪些方面采取了主动行动?在俱乐部理论和国际关系文献的基础上,我们通过对中东欧内部政策动态的深入分析来解决研究问题。从理论角度来看,我们认为中国在中东欧比俄罗斯更活跃,我们的实证分析也证实了这一点。然而,俄罗斯也参与了几个CEM倡议。在领导方面,中国表现出比俄罗斯更有兴趣扮演这一角色。我们的结论是,总体而言,中国在收集信息和发展与其他成员国和私人行为体的网络方面更好地战略性地利用了CEM,以实施克服清洁能源转型挑战的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leadership in high-level forums on energy governance: China and Russia compared
ABSTRACT This study investigates the participation of China and Russia in the Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM). In which policy initiatives have these two countries participated? In which initiatives have they taken the lead? Building on the club theory and international relations literature, we approach the research questions by offering an in-depth analysis of the policy dynamics inside the CEM. From a theoretical viewpoint, we posit that China has been more active in the CEM than Russia, which our empirical analysis confirms. However, Russia has also been involved in several CEM initiatives. Concerning leadership, China has demonstrated a greater interest in playing that role than Russia. We conclude that, overall, China makes a better strategic use of the CEM in terms of gathering information and developing networks with other member states as well as private actors in order to implement measures for overcoming the challenges of clean energy transition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Post-Communist Economies publishes key research and policy articles in the analysis of post-communist economies. The basic transformation in the past two decades through stabilisation, liberalisation and privatisation has been completed in virtually all of the former communist countries, but despite the dramatic changes that have taken place, the post-communist economies still form a clearly identifiable group, distinguished by the impact of the years of communist rule. Post-communist economies still present distinctive problems that make them a particular focus of research.
期刊最新文献
European integration and economic growth in emerging Europe: the role of institutions and policy factors External debt burden and economic growth: evidence from Central Asia The impact of special economic zones on industrial enterprises’ productivity in Russia Does one good turn deserve another? Evidence from China’s trade and aid policy Can SEE economies grow stronger together? Empirical evidence from the CEFTA region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1