ChatGPT人工智能聊天机器人:如何很好地回答会计评估问题?

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI:10.2308/issues-2023-013
David A. Wood, M. P. Achhpilia, Mollie T. Adams, Sanaz Aghazadeh, Kazeem O. Akinyele, Mfon Akpan, Kristian D. Allee, Abigail Allen, E. D. Almer, Daniel Ames, Viktor Arity, Dereck Barr‐Pulliam, K. A. Basoglu, Andrew Belnap, Jeremiah W. Bentley, T. Berg, Nathan R. Berglund, Erica Berry, Avishek Bhandari, Md Nazmul Hasan Bhuyan, Paulette Black, Eva Blondeel, David Bond, Annika Bonrath, A. F. Borthick, E. S. Boyle, M. Bradford, D. M. Brandon, Joseph F. Brazel, Bryan G. Brockbank, Marcus Burger, Dmitri Byzalov, James N. Cannon, Cecile Q. Caro, Abraham H. Carr, Jack M. Cathey, Ryan Cating, K. Charron, Stacy Chavez, Jason Chen, Jennifer C. Chen, Jennifer W. Chen, Christine Cheng, Xu Cheng, Brant E. Christensen, K. Church, N. J. Cicone, Patience Constance, Lauren A. Cooper, Candice L. Correia, Joshua G. Coyne, W. Cram, Asher Curtis, Ronald J. Daigle, Steven Dannemiller, Stephan A. Davenport, Gregory S. Dawson, Karen J. De Meyst, Scott Dell, Sebahattin Demirkan, Christine A. Denison, Hrishikesh Desai, S. DeSimone,
{"title":"ChatGPT人工智能聊天机器人:如何很好地回答会计评估问题?","authors":"David A. Wood, M. P. Achhpilia, Mollie T. Adams, Sanaz Aghazadeh, Kazeem O. Akinyele, Mfon Akpan, Kristian D. Allee, Abigail Allen, E. D. Almer, Daniel Ames, Viktor Arity, Dereck Barr‐Pulliam, K. A. Basoglu, Andrew Belnap, Jeremiah W. Bentley, T. Berg, Nathan R. Berglund, Erica Berry, Avishek Bhandari, Md Nazmul Hasan Bhuyan, Paulette Black, Eva Blondeel, David Bond, Annika Bonrath, A. F. Borthick, E. S. Boyle, M. Bradford, D. M. Brandon, Joseph F. Brazel, Bryan G. Brockbank, Marcus Burger, Dmitri Byzalov, James N. Cannon, Cecile Q. Caro, Abraham H. Carr, Jack M. Cathey, Ryan Cating, K. Charron, Stacy Chavez, Jason Chen, Jennifer C. Chen, Jennifer W. Chen, Christine Cheng, Xu Cheng, Brant E. Christensen, K. Church, N. J. Cicone, Patience Constance, Lauren A. Cooper, Candice L. Correia, Joshua G. Coyne, W. Cram, Asher Curtis, Ronald J. Daigle, Steven Dannemiller, Stephan A. Davenport, Gregory S. Dawson, Karen J. De Meyst, Scott Dell, Sebahattin Demirkan, Christine A. Denison, Hrishikesh Desai, S. DeSimone,","doi":"10.2308/issues-2023-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n ChatGPT, a language-learning model chatbot, has garnered considerable attention for its ability to respond to users’ questions. Using data from 14 countries and 186 institutions, we compare ChatGPT and student performance for 28,085 questions from accounting assessments and textbook test banks. As of January 2023, ChatGPT provides correct answers for 56.5 percent of questions and partially correct answers for an additional 9.4 percent of questions. When considering point values for questions, students significantly outperform ChatGPT with a 76.7 percent average on assessments compared to 47.5 percent for ChatGPT if no partial credit is awarded and 56.5 percent if partial credit is awarded. Still, ChatGPT performs better than the student average for 15.8 percent of assessments when we include partial credit. We provide evidence of how ChatGPT performs on different question types, accounting topics, class levels, open/closed assessments, and test bank questions. We also discuss implications for accounting education and research.","PeriodicalId":46324,"journal":{"name":"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ChatGPT Artificial Intelligence Chatbot: How Well Does It Answer Accounting Assessment Questions?\",\"authors\":\"David A. Wood, M. P. Achhpilia, Mollie T. Adams, Sanaz Aghazadeh, Kazeem O. Akinyele, Mfon Akpan, Kristian D. Allee, Abigail Allen, E. D. Almer, Daniel Ames, Viktor Arity, Dereck Barr‐Pulliam, K. A. Basoglu, Andrew Belnap, Jeremiah W. Bentley, T. Berg, Nathan R. Berglund, Erica Berry, Avishek Bhandari, Md Nazmul Hasan Bhuyan, Paulette Black, Eva Blondeel, David Bond, Annika Bonrath, A. F. Borthick, E. S. Boyle, M. Bradford, D. M. Brandon, Joseph F. Brazel, Bryan G. Brockbank, Marcus Burger, Dmitri Byzalov, James N. Cannon, Cecile Q. Caro, Abraham H. Carr, Jack M. Cathey, Ryan Cating, K. Charron, Stacy Chavez, Jason Chen, Jennifer C. Chen, Jennifer W. Chen, Christine Cheng, Xu Cheng, Brant E. Christensen, K. Church, N. J. Cicone, Patience Constance, Lauren A. Cooper, Candice L. Correia, Joshua G. Coyne, W. Cram, Asher Curtis, Ronald J. Daigle, Steven Dannemiller, Stephan A. Davenport, Gregory S. Dawson, Karen J. De Meyst, Scott Dell, Sebahattin Demirkan, Christine A. Denison, Hrishikesh Desai, S. DeSimone,\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/issues-2023-013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n ChatGPT, a language-learning model chatbot, has garnered considerable attention for its ability to respond to users’ questions. Using data from 14 countries and 186 institutions, we compare ChatGPT and student performance for 28,085 questions from accounting assessments and textbook test banks. As of January 2023, ChatGPT provides correct answers for 56.5 percent of questions and partially correct answers for an additional 9.4 percent of questions. When considering point values for questions, students significantly outperform ChatGPT with a 76.7 percent average on assessments compared to 47.5 percent for ChatGPT if no partial credit is awarded and 56.5 percent if partial credit is awarded. Still, ChatGPT performs better than the student average for 15.8 percent of assessments when we include partial credit. We provide evidence of how ChatGPT performs on different question types, accounting topics, class levels, open/closed assessments, and test bank questions. We also discuss implications for accounting education and research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2023-013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2023-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

ChatGPT是一种语言学习模型聊天机器人,因其回答用户问题的能力而引起了相当大的关注。使用来自14个国家和186个机构的数据,我们比较了ChatGPT和学生在会计评估和教科书测试库中28,085个问题的表现。截至2023年1月,ChatGPT为56.5%的问题提供正确答案,并为另外9.4%的问题提供部分正确答案。当考虑到问题的分值时,学生的平均评估成绩明显优于ChatGPT,为76.7%,而ChatGPT在没有部分学分的情况下为47.5%,在有部分学分的情况下为56.5%。尽管如此,当我们包括部分学分时,ChatGPT在15.8%的评估中表现得比学生平均水平要好。我们提供了ChatGPT在不同问题类型、会计主题、课程水平、开放/封闭评估和测试库问题上的表现。我们还讨论了对会计教育和研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The ChatGPT Artificial Intelligence Chatbot: How Well Does It Answer Accounting Assessment Questions?
ChatGPT, a language-learning model chatbot, has garnered considerable attention for its ability to respond to users’ questions. Using data from 14 countries and 186 institutions, we compare ChatGPT and student performance for 28,085 questions from accounting assessments and textbook test banks. As of January 2023, ChatGPT provides correct answers for 56.5 percent of questions and partially correct answers for an additional 9.4 percent of questions. When considering point values for questions, students significantly outperform ChatGPT with a 76.7 percent average on assessments compared to 47.5 percent for ChatGPT if no partial credit is awarded and 56.5 percent if partial credit is awarded. Still, ChatGPT performs better than the student average for 15.8 percent of assessments when we include partial credit. We provide evidence of how ChatGPT performs on different question types, accounting topics, class levels, open/closed assessments, and test bank questions. We also discuss implications for accounting education and research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The mission of Issues in Accounting Education is to publish research, commentaries, instructional resources, and book reviews that assist accounting faculty in teaching and that address important issues in accounting education. The journal will consist of two major sections, “Research and Commentary” and “Instructional Resources”.
期刊最新文献
Ethics in Financial Reporting Methods: The Case of Vontsira, Inc. The Gig Is Up: Examining Side Gig Income and Allowable Deductions It’s Not a Secret Anymore! People's Republic of China Company and Audit Firm Collide Accounting Program Leaders’ Perceptions of Criteria for Hiring Assistant Professors Editorial Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1