19 日本LVAD治疗进展

Q2 Medicine Heart Asia Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.1136/heartasia-2019-apahff.19
G. Matsumiya
{"title":"19 日本LVAD治疗进展","authors":"G. Matsumiya","doi":"10.1136/heartasia-2019-apahff.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been increasingly utilised for the treatment of advanced (ACC/AHA stage D) heart failure. Three types of implantable device (HeartMate IITM, Jarvik 2000®, and EVAHEARTTM) are currently available as a bridge-to-transplant in Japan. J-MACS (Japanese registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support) has listed a total of 722 patients between December 2010 and October 2017. Mean age was 43.2 years and mean body surface area was 1.63 m2. Aetiology of heart failure was dilated cardiomyopathy in 77% and ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 11%. Pre-operative INTERMACS profile was level 1 in 10%, level 2 in 39%, level 3 in 48%, and level 4 or 5 in 4%. One hundred forty-nine (21%) patients received extracorporeal life support device first for cardiogenic shock or bridge-to-candidacy, and then underwent switch to implantable devices (bridge-to-bridge). Overall survival rate after LVAD implantation was 90% at 1 year and 86% at 2 years. Competing outcome analyses demonstrated that only 10% of patients reached heart transplantation and 60% were still on device therapy at 3 years. Causes of death were cerebrovascular accident in 44%, infection in 18%, bleeding in 6%, and device failure in 6%. Sixty-six per cent of patients required at least 1 hospital admission during an initial 1 year after device implantation. In conclusion, continuous flow LVAD was effective for bridge-to-transplant. Although the collected data indicate that the improved survival rate is acceptable, there remains potential for major complications which precludes wider application of LVAD.","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":"11 1","pages":"A8 - A9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2019-apahff.19","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"19 Update of LVAD therapy in japan\",\"authors\":\"G. Matsumiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartasia-2019-apahff.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been increasingly utilised for the treatment of advanced (ACC/AHA stage D) heart failure. Three types of implantable device (HeartMate IITM, Jarvik 2000®, and EVAHEARTTM) are currently available as a bridge-to-transplant in Japan. J-MACS (Japanese registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support) has listed a total of 722 patients between December 2010 and October 2017. Mean age was 43.2 years and mean body surface area was 1.63 m2. Aetiology of heart failure was dilated cardiomyopathy in 77% and ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 11%. Pre-operative INTERMACS profile was level 1 in 10%, level 2 in 39%, level 3 in 48%, and level 4 or 5 in 4%. One hundred forty-nine (21%) patients received extracorporeal life support device first for cardiogenic shock or bridge-to-candidacy, and then underwent switch to implantable devices (bridge-to-bridge). Overall survival rate after LVAD implantation was 90% at 1 year and 86% at 2 years. Competing outcome analyses demonstrated that only 10% of patients reached heart transplantation and 60% were still on device therapy at 3 years. Causes of death were cerebrovascular accident in 44%, infection in 18%, bleeding in 6%, and device failure in 6%. Sixty-six per cent of patients required at least 1 hospital admission during an initial 1 year after device implantation. In conclusion, continuous flow LVAD was effective for bridge-to-transplant. Although the collected data indicate that the improved survival rate is acceptable, there remains potential for major complications which precludes wider application of LVAD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Asia\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"A8 - A9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2019-apahff.19\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2019-apahff.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2019-apahff.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)已越来越多地用于治疗晚期(ACC/AHA D期)心力衰竭。三种类型的植入式设备(HeartMate IITM、Jarvik 2000®和EVAHEARTTM)目前可作为日本移植的桥梁。J-MACS(日本机械辅助循环支持注册中心)列出了2010年12月至2017年10月期间共722名患者。平均年龄43.2岁,平均体表面积1.63平方米。心力衰竭的病因是扩张型心肌病77%,缺血性心肌病11%。术前INTERMACS表现为1级占10%,2级占39%,3级占48%,4或5级占4%。一百四十九(21%)名患者首先接受了体外生命支持装置治疗心源性休克或桥接至候选,然后接受了植入式装置的转换(桥接至桥接)。LVAD植入术后的总生存率在1 2年时为86%。竞争性结果分析表明,只有10%的患者完成了心脏移植,60%的患者在3年时仍在接受设备治疗。死亡原因为脑血管意外占44%,感染占18%,出血占6%,器械故障占6%。66%的患者在最初的1 植入装置后一年。结论:连续流LVAD对桥移植是有效的。尽管收集的数据表明,生存率的提高是可以接受的,但仍有可能出现严重并发症,从而阻碍LVAD的广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19 Update of LVAD therapy in japan
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been increasingly utilised for the treatment of advanced (ACC/AHA stage D) heart failure. Three types of implantable device (HeartMate IITM, Jarvik 2000®, and EVAHEARTTM) are currently available as a bridge-to-transplant in Japan. J-MACS (Japanese registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support) has listed a total of 722 patients between December 2010 and October 2017. Mean age was 43.2 years and mean body surface area was 1.63 m2. Aetiology of heart failure was dilated cardiomyopathy in 77% and ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 11%. Pre-operative INTERMACS profile was level 1 in 10%, level 2 in 39%, level 3 in 48%, and level 4 or 5 in 4%. One hundred forty-nine (21%) patients received extracorporeal life support device first for cardiogenic shock or bridge-to-candidacy, and then underwent switch to implantable devices (bridge-to-bridge). Overall survival rate after LVAD implantation was 90% at 1 year and 86% at 2 years. Competing outcome analyses demonstrated that only 10% of patients reached heart transplantation and 60% were still on device therapy at 3 years. Causes of death were cerebrovascular accident in 44%, infection in 18%, bleeding in 6%, and device failure in 6%. Sixty-six per cent of patients required at least 1 hospital admission during an initial 1 year after device implantation. In conclusion, continuous flow LVAD was effective for bridge-to-transplant. Although the collected data indicate that the improved survival rate is acceptable, there remains potential for major complications which precludes wider application of LVAD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Asia
Heart Asia Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Statin adherence and persistence on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Taiwan. Anaesthesia use in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Association of school hours with outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in schoolchildren Clinical consequences of poor adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease: can we do better?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1