{"title":"亚眠圣母院:哥特式大教堂的生活。","authors":"Zachary Stewart","doi":"10.1080/00681288.2021.1965331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Well over a century ago, Eug ene Lef evre-Pontalis published a ground-breaking guide for prospective authors of medieval church monographs, outlining a series of organisational, terminological and illustrative principles that continue to characterise the genre into the present day. While conceding there could be no substitute for the on-site explication of architectural conditions — a claim that attendees of the BAA’s annual conferences would be hard-pressed to contest — the eminent French archaeologist argued that there did exist numerous techniques for rendering a written account of a church ‘clear and interesting’ (claire et int eressante). At the level of substance, he recommended alternating between small-scale analysis and large-scale comparison, beginning with a section on historical context and concluding with sections on fittings and furnishings. At the level of style, he recommended proceeding through the building in a systematic fashion (west to east, bottom to top, inside to outside), employing technical terminology and enlisting professional photography. Only by implementing such practices, Lef evre-Pontalis contended, might an aspiring scholar be considered a practitioner of ‘the new archaeological method’ (la nouvelle m ethode arch eologique). Stephen Murray’s latest book on Amiens Cathedral, the publication of which marks the 800th anniversary of the building’s foundation, represents a quiet referendum on this enduring approach to the study of medieval churches. Murray is a well-known authority on what has long been celebrated as a seminal achievement in the history of Gothic architecture (he was made an honorary citizen of Amiens in 1998 and an honorary doctor of the University of Picardy, Jules Verne, in 2019). Two of his earlier books anticipate the present work. The first, NotreDame, Cathedral of Amiens: The Power of Change in Gothic (Cambridge 1996), delivered a boldly revisionist account of the construction of the edifice between c. 1220 and c. 1270. The second, A Gothic Sermon: Making a Contract with the Mother of God, Saint Mary of Amiens (Berkeley 2004), mobilised a local mid13th-century sermon text to analyse issues of production, reception and meaning. Many of the findings delineated in these pioneering studies recur here. But the new book expands on its predecessors by extending their chronological, spatial and social parameters — tactics that reflect the subtitle’s stated aim of presenting a more comprehensive ‘life’ of the famous building. The resulting work is organised into six chapters bookended by a prologue and an epilogue. The prologue opens with a provocative question: ‘How can we hope to create a written structure to match the cathedral’ (p. 1)? Murray, citing decades of teaching experience, recommends a ‘Socratic method’ in which the specialist (‘interlocuter’) employs a form of ekphrasis conceptualised less in terms of the agency of the author-subject and more in terms of the agency of the buildingobject (p. 2). Regrettably, no attempt is made to examine how such a modus operandi might relate to other historiographical theories or practices, but it does elucidate the structure of what follows. Chapter 1 provides an extended two-part introduction to the cathedral. Part one, ‘the vanished past’, focuses on urban, political and socioeconomic conditions","PeriodicalId":42723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the British Archaeological Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notre-Dame of Amiens: Life of the Gothic Cathedral.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00681288.2021.1965331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Well over a century ago, Eug ene Lef evre-Pontalis published a ground-breaking guide for prospective authors of medieval church monographs, outlining a series of organisational, terminological and illustrative principles that continue to characterise the genre into the present day. While conceding there could be no substitute for the on-site explication of architectural conditions — a claim that attendees of the BAA’s annual conferences would be hard-pressed to contest — the eminent French archaeologist argued that there did exist numerous techniques for rendering a written account of a church ‘clear and interesting’ (claire et int eressante). At the level of substance, he recommended alternating between small-scale analysis and large-scale comparison, beginning with a section on historical context and concluding with sections on fittings and furnishings. At the level of style, he recommended proceeding through the building in a systematic fashion (west to east, bottom to top, inside to outside), employing technical terminology and enlisting professional photography. Only by implementing such practices, Lef evre-Pontalis contended, might an aspiring scholar be considered a practitioner of ‘the new archaeological method’ (la nouvelle m ethode arch eologique). Stephen Murray’s latest book on Amiens Cathedral, the publication of which marks the 800th anniversary of the building’s foundation, represents a quiet referendum on this enduring approach to the study of medieval churches. Murray is a well-known authority on what has long been celebrated as a seminal achievement in the history of Gothic architecture (he was made an honorary citizen of Amiens in 1998 and an honorary doctor of the University of Picardy, Jules Verne, in 2019). Two of his earlier books anticipate the present work. The first, NotreDame, Cathedral of Amiens: The Power of Change in Gothic (Cambridge 1996), delivered a boldly revisionist account of the construction of the edifice between c. 1220 and c. 1270. The second, A Gothic Sermon: Making a Contract with the Mother of God, Saint Mary of Amiens (Berkeley 2004), mobilised a local mid13th-century sermon text to analyse issues of production, reception and meaning. Many of the findings delineated in these pioneering studies recur here. But the new book expands on its predecessors by extending their chronological, spatial and social parameters — tactics that reflect the subtitle’s stated aim of presenting a more comprehensive ‘life’ of the famous building. The resulting work is organised into six chapters bookended by a prologue and an epilogue. The prologue opens with a provocative question: ‘How can we hope to create a written structure to match the cathedral’ (p. 1)? Murray, citing decades of teaching experience, recommends a ‘Socratic method’ in which the specialist (‘interlocuter’) employs a form of ekphrasis conceptualised less in terms of the agency of the author-subject and more in terms of the agency of the buildingobject (p. 2). Regrettably, no attempt is made to examine how such a modus operandi might relate to other historiographical theories or practices, but it does elucidate the structure of what follows. Chapter 1 provides an extended two-part introduction to the cathedral. Part one, ‘the vanished past’, focuses on urban, political and socioeconomic conditions\",\"PeriodicalId\":42723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the British Archaeological Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the British Archaeological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00681288.2021.1965331\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the British Archaeological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00681288.2021.1965331","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
早在一个多世纪前,Eug ene Lef evre Pontalis就为中世纪教会专著的潜在作者出版了一本开创性的指南,概述了一系列组织、术语和说明原则,这些原则一直延续到今天。这位著名的法国考古学家承认,没有什么可以替代对建筑条件的现场解释——英国建筑协会年会的与会者很难对此提出质疑——但他认为,确实存在许多技术可以使教堂的书面描述“清晰有趣”(claire et int eressante)。在实质内容方面,他建议在小规模分析和大规模比较之间交替进行,从关于历史背景的一节开始,到关于配件和家具的一节结束。在风格层面,他建议以系统的方式(从西到东、从下到上、从内到外)穿过建筑,使用技术术语并聘请专业摄影。Lef evre Pontalis认为,只有实施这些实践,一个有抱负的学者才能被视为“新考古方法”(新考古方法)的实践者。斯蒂芬·默里(Stephen Murray)关于亚眠大教堂(Amiens Cathedral)的最新著作是在该建筑建成800周年之际出版的,这本书代表了对中世纪教堂研究这种持久方法的一次无声的公投。默里是哥特式建筑史上长期以来被誉为开创性成就的著名权威(1998年被授予亚眠荣誉公民,2019年被授予皮卡第大学荣誉博士儒勒·凡尔纳)。他早期的两本书预见了现在的工作。第一部作品是《亚眠大教堂:哥特式变革的力量》(NotreDame,Cathedral of Amiens:The Power of Change in Gothic)(剑桥,1996年),对该建筑在约1220年至约1270年间的建造进行了大胆的修正主义描述。第二本《哥特式布道:与圣母亚眠圣玛丽签订合同》(伯克利,2004年)动员了当地13世纪中期的布道文本来分析生产、接受和意义问题。这些开创性研究中的许多发现在此重复出现。但这本新书在前几本书的基础上扩展了它们的时间、空间和社会参数,这些策略反映了副标题所宣称的展示这座著名建筑更全面“生活”的目标。由此产生的作品分为六章,以序言和结语结尾。序言以一个挑衅性的问题开场:“我们怎么能希望创造一个与大教堂相匹配的书面结构呢?”(第1页)?Murray引用了几十年的教学经验,推荐了一种“苏格拉底方法”,在这种方法中,专家(“中介人”)采用了一种ekphrasis形式,这种形式的概念化较少涉及作者主体的代理,而更多涉及构建主体的代理(第2页)。令人遗憾的是,没有人试图研究这种操作方式与其他史学理论或实践之间的关系,但它确实阐明了以下内容的结构。第一章对大教堂进行了分为两部分的介绍。第一部分,“消失的过去”,关注城市、政治和社会经济状况
Notre-Dame of Amiens: Life of the Gothic Cathedral.
Well over a century ago, Eug ene Lef evre-Pontalis published a ground-breaking guide for prospective authors of medieval church monographs, outlining a series of organisational, terminological and illustrative principles that continue to characterise the genre into the present day. While conceding there could be no substitute for the on-site explication of architectural conditions — a claim that attendees of the BAA’s annual conferences would be hard-pressed to contest — the eminent French archaeologist argued that there did exist numerous techniques for rendering a written account of a church ‘clear and interesting’ (claire et int eressante). At the level of substance, he recommended alternating between small-scale analysis and large-scale comparison, beginning with a section on historical context and concluding with sections on fittings and furnishings. At the level of style, he recommended proceeding through the building in a systematic fashion (west to east, bottom to top, inside to outside), employing technical terminology and enlisting professional photography. Only by implementing such practices, Lef evre-Pontalis contended, might an aspiring scholar be considered a practitioner of ‘the new archaeological method’ (la nouvelle m ethode arch eologique). Stephen Murray’s latest book on Amiens Cathedral, the publication of which marks the 800th anniversary of the building’s foundation, represents a quiet referendum on this enduring approach to the study of medieval churches. Murray is a well-known authority on what has long been celebrated as a seminal achievement in the history of Gothic architecture (he was made an honorary citizen of Amiens in 1998 and an honorary doctor of the University of Picardy, Jules Verne, in 2019). Two of his earlier books anticipate the present work. The first, NotreDame, Cathedral of Amiens: The Power of Change in Gothic (Cambridge 1996), delivered a boldly revisionist account of the construction of the edifice between c. 1220 and c. 1270. The second, A Gothic Sermon: Making a Contract with the Mother of God, Saint Mary of Amiens (Berkeley 2004), mobilised a local mid13th-century sermon text to analyse issues of production, reception and meaning. Many of the findings delineated in these pioneering studies recur here. But the new book expands on its predecessors by extending their chronological, spatial and social parameters — tactics that reflect the subtitle’s stated aim of presenting a more comprehensive ‘life’ of the famous building. The resulting work is organised into six chapters bookended by a prologue and an epilogue. The prologue opens with a provocative question: ‘How can we hope to create a written structure to match the cathedral’ (p. 1)? Murray, citing decades of teaching experience, recommends a ‘Socratic method’ in which the specialist (‘interlocuter’) employs a form of ekphrasis conceptualised less in terms of the agency of the author-subject and more in terms of the agency of the buildingobject (p. 2). Regrettably, no attempt is made to examine how such a modus operandi might relate to other historiographical theories or practices, but it does elucidate the structure of what follows. Chapter 1 provides an extended two-part introduction to the cathedral. Part one, ‘the vanished past’, focuses on urban, political and socioeconomic conditions