无效食管动力的药物治疗:系统综述

Alexander T. Reddy, E. Song, R. Shimpi, S. Cantrell, D. Leiman
{"title":"无效食管动力的药物治疗:系统综述","authors":"Alexander T. Reddy, E. Song, R. Shimpi, S. Cantrell, D. Leiman","doi":"10.1177/26345161231168955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a commonly identified disorder of peristalsis. Although often asymptomatic, IEM can be associated with dysphagia. Aside from treating co-existing gastroesophageal reflux disease and sources of mechanical obstruction, few options are available for management in this context. We therefore systematically reviewed the literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for medical treatments of IEM. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched using controlled vocabulary and keywords to identify RCTs from inception through 9/22/2021. Prospective studies evaluating medical therapy to improve dysphagia in adults with IEM were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Among 1046 studies identified, 6 (0.58%) met inclusion criteria with a total of 65 patients. Most studies evaluated serotonin receptor agonists (buspirone, mosapride, prucalopride, and sumatriptan), primarily assessing changes on esophageal high-resolution manometry parameters, and only 1 study evaluated patient reported outcomes. Overall, medical therapy improved these pooled outcomes in 5 (83%) studies. Although treatment endpoints varied, the risk of bias in study reporting was low for 4 studies and uncertain for 2 studies. There are currently few therapeutic options available for IEM patients with symptomatic non-obstructive dysphagia. Our systematic review identified 6 studies utilizing medical therapy in patients with IEM, and a majority demonstrated an improvement in HRM parameters. Medical therapy may therefore be considered in this context, but additional studies are warranted to assess for similar improvement in patient symptoms.","PeriodicalId":73049,"journal":{"name":"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Therapy for Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Alexander T. Reddy, E. Song, R. Shimpi, S. Cantrell, D. Leiman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26345161231168955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a commonly identified disorder of peristalsis. Although often asymptomatic, IEM can be associated with dysphagia. Aside from treating co-existing gastroesophageal reflux disease and sources of mechanical obstruction, few options are available for management in this context. We therefore systematically reviewed the literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for medical treatments of IEM. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched using controlled vocabulary and keywords to identify RCTs from inception through 9/22/2021. Prospective studies evaluating medical therapy to improve dysphagia in adults with IEM were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Among 1046 studies identified, 6 (0.58%) met inclusion criteria with a total of 65 patients. Most studies evaluated serotonin receptor agonists (buspirone, mosapride, prucalopride, and sumatriptan), primarily assessing changes on esophageal high-resolution manometry parameters, and only 1 study evaluated patient reported outcomes. Overall, medical therapy improved these pooled outcomes in 5 (83%) studies. Although treatment endpoints varied, the risk of bias in study reporting was low for 4 studies and uncertain for 2 studies. There are currently few therapeutic options available for IEM patients with symptomatic non-obstructive dysphagia. Our systematic review identified 6 studies utilizing medical therapy in patients with IEM, and a majority demonstrated an improvement in HRM parameters. Medical therapy may therefore be considered in this context, but additional studies are warranted to assess for similar improvement in patient symptoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161231168955\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161231168955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无效的食道蠕动(IEM)是一种常见的蠕动障碍。尽管IEM通常无症状,但可能与吞咽困难有关。除了治疗同时存在的胃食管反流病和机械性梗阻外,在这种情况下,几乎没有可用的治疗方法。因此,我们系统地回顾了文献,以确定IEM药物治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science使用受控词汇和关键词进行搜索,以确定从开始到2021年9月22日的随机对照试验。前瞻性研究评估了药物治疗改善成人IEM吞咽困难的效果。使用修订的Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。在确定的1046项研究中,6项(0.58%)符合纳入标准,共有65名患者。大多数研究评估了5-羟色胺受体激动剂(丁螺环酮、莫沙必利、普卡罗必利和舒马曲普坦),主要评估食道高分辨率测压参数的变化,只有1项研究评估了患者报告的结果。总体而言,在5项(83%)研究中,药物治疗改善了这些合并结果。尽管治疗终点各不相同,但4项研究的研究报告偏倚风险较低,2项研究的偏倚风险不确定。目前,对于有症状的非阻塞性吞咽困难的IEM患者,几乎没有可用的治疗方案。我们的系统综述确定了6项在IEM患者中使用药物治疗的研究,大多数研究表明HRM参数有所改善。因此,在这种情况下可以考虑药物治疗,但需要进行额外的研究来评估患者症状的类似改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical Therapy for Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Systematic Review
Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a commonly identified disorder of peristalsis. Although often asymptomatic, IEM can be associated with dysphagia. Aside from treating co-existing gastroesophageal reflux disease and sources of mechanical obstruction, few options are available for management in this context. We therefore systematically reviewed the literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for medical treatments of IEM. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched using controlled vocabulary and keywords to identify RCTs from inception through 9/22/2021. Prospective studies evaluating medical therapy to improve dysphagia in adults with IEM were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Among 1046 studies identified, 6 (0.58%) met inclusion criteria with a total of 65 patients. Most studies evaluated serotonin receptor agonists (buspirone, mosapride, prucalopride, and sumatriptan), primarily assessing changes on esophageal high-resolution manometry parameters, and only 1 study evaluated patient reported outcomes. Overall, medical therapy improved these pooled outcomes in 5 (83%) studies. Although treatment endpoints varied, the risk of bias in study reporting was low for 4 studies and uncertain for 2 studies. There are currently few therapeutic options available for IEM patients with symptomatic non-obstructive dysphagia. Our systematic review identified 6 studies utilizing medical therapy in patients with IEM, and a majority demonstrated an improvement in HRM parameters. Medical therapy may therefore be considered in this context, but additional studies are warranted to assess for similar improvement in patient symptoms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Image Enhanced Endoscopy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Empiric Esophageal Dilation for the Treatment of Non-Obstructive Dysphagia Presidential Address 2023: “Just by Showing Up” Invited Commentary: Reflux Disease Questionnaire Scoring and Utilization: A Scoping Review Gastric Electrical Stimulation is an Effective Treatment Modality for Symptoms of GERD in Patients With Gastroparesis and VACTERL Association
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1