阵发性交感神经过度活跃:忽视房间里大象的存在

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740206
P. Bithal, Siddharth Chavali
{"title":"阵发性交感神经过度活跃:忽视房间里大象的存在","authors":"P. Bithal, Siddharth Chavali","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"infection, malnutrition, dehydration, tracheostomy, longer hospitalization longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays, contractures, and heterotopic ossification. PSH remains an under-recognized condition that is difficult to diagnose. A high index of suspicion is key to early diagnosis. The first step in diagnosis is to exclude conditions with similar symptoms, such as infection, sedation withdrawal, seizures, and pulmonary embolism. Clinical diagnostic tools (PSH assessment measure) have been proposed to assist clinicians in the reliable identification of PSH.8 Such tools incorporate a clinical feature scale that categorizes the severity of sympathetic signs during episodes and a diagnostic tool that gauges the likelihood of diagnosis of PSH based on the presence of characteristic features. These two components are combined in a score that reflects the degree of confidence in diagnosis of PSH. The feasibility and reliability of these tools have been recently validated by van Eijck et al.9 There is evidence that they may reduce the chances of misdiagnosis and favorably impact hospital length of stay and costs of hospitalization.10 The pathophysiology of PSH is poorly understood and the dominant theory suggests the failure of the central autonomic network. Disruption of descending pathways releases sympathetic responses from their normal inhibitory modulation. The consequence is that sympathetic responses to internal or external stimuli become exaggerated.11 The interruption of descending inhibitory modulation might also produce maladaptive changes in the spinal cord leading to excitatory interneuronal activity.12 These changes could help explain how non-noxious stimuli are perceived as noxious by brain.12 While formal evidence on treatment is scant and lacks methodological quality, PSH is a disorder that can be treated.13 Can episodes be prevented with pharmacological intervention? There is at least one retrospective study that claims so. Tang et al asserted that dexmedetomidine infusion has Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) is a syndrome of excessive and pathological adrenergic output to nociceptive or non-nociceptive (including environmental) stimuli. It is observed as a complication of various acute brain insults such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, anoxic brain injury, tumors, infections, autoimmune encephalitis, and acute hydrocephalus. It can manifest as a constellation of episodic, simultaneous symptoms such as tachycardia, hyperthermia, hypertension, tachypnea, and diaphoresis, often accompanied by dystonia and even motor posturing.1 Onset of these symptoms is usually fast, but resolution is slow, unless terminated by medication. Since the first description of this syndrome by Penfield,2 many names have been ascribed to it which has created puzzlement in its diagnosis as well as understanding of its pathophysiology. Some of the names associated with this condition over the years are “autonomic storm,” “sympathetic storm,” “hypothalamic dysregulation syndrome,” and “paroxysmal autonomic instability with dystonia.” In 2014, the International Brain Injury Association proposed the term “paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity.”3 Its overall incidence is 18% among various cohorts of patients admitted in neurocritical care with an incidence of 33% in severe TBI patients.4 According to Perkes et al, 80% of cases of PSH are observed after TBI, and the remaining 20% following other cerebral pathologies.5 The most consistent observation is that patients with PSH are frequently young and comatose. Pediatric patients appear more prone to develop PSH after anoxic–ischemic insults and with non-bacterial encephalitis.6 It is common that patients with PSH are erroneously suspected of having other diagnoses, and this may lead to unnecessary testing and sometimes inappropriate treatments, making an early and accurate diagnosis important.7 PSH may persist for weeks or months, and has been associated with worse clinical outcomes such as increased time of mechanical ventilation,","PeriodicalId":16574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity: Ignoring the Presence of an Elephant in the Room\",\"authors\":\"P. Bithal, Siddharth Chavali\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1740206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"infection, malnutrition, dehydration, tracheostomy, longer hospitalization longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays, contractures, and heterotopic ossification. PSH remains an under-recognized condition that is difficult to diagnose. A high index of suspicion is key to early diagnosis. The first step in diagnosis is to exclude conditions with similar symptoms, such as infection, sedation withdrawal, seizures, and pulmonary embolism. Clinical diagnostic tools (PSH assessment measure) have been proposed to assist clinicians in the reliable identification of PSH.8 Such tools incorporate a clinical feature scale that categorizes the severity of sympathetic signs during episodes and a diagnostic tool that gauges the likelihood of diagnosis of PSH based on the presence of characteristic features. These two components are combined in a score that reflects the degree of confidence in diagnosis of PSH. The feasibility and reliability of these tools have been recently validated by van Eijck et al.9 There is evidence that they may reduce the chances of misdiagnosis and favorably impact hospital length of stay and costs of hospitalization.10 The pathophysiology of PSH is poorly understood and the dominant theory suggests the failure of the central autonomic network. Disruption of descending pathways releases sympathetic responses from their normal inhibitory modulation. The consequence is that sympathetic responses to internal or external stimuli become exaggerated.11 The interruption of descending inhibitory modulation might also produce maladaptive changes in the spinal cord leading to excitatory interneuronal activity.12 These changes could help explain how non-noxious stimuli are perceived as noxious by brain.12 While formal evidence on treatment is scant and lacks methodological quality, PSH is a disorder that can be treated.13 Can episodes be prevented with pharmacological intervention? There is at least one retrospective study that claims so. Tang et al asserted that dexmedetomidine infusion has Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) is a syndrome of excessive and pathological adrenergic output to nociceptive or non-nociceptive (including environmental) stimuli. It is observed as a complication of various acute brain insults such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, anoxic brain injury, tumors, infections, autoimmune encephalitis, and acute hydrocephalus. It can manifest as a constellation of episodic, simultaneous symptoms such as tachycardia, hyperthermia, hypertension, tachypnea, and diaphoresis, often accompanied by dystonia and even motor posturing.1 Onset of these symptoms is usually fast, but resolution is slow, unless terminated by medication. Since the first description of this syndrome by Penfield,2 many names have been ascribed to it which has created puzzlement in its diagnosis as well as understanding of its pathophysiology. Some of the names associated with this condition over the years are “autonomic storm,” “sympathetic storm,” “hypothalamic dysregulation syndrome,” and “paroxysmal autonomic instability with dystonia.” In 2014, the International Brain Injury Association proposed the term “paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity.”3 Its overall incidence is 18% among various cohorts of patients admitted in neurocritical care with an incidence of 33% in severe TBI patients.4 According to Perkes et al, 80% of cases of PSH are observed after TBI, and the remaining 20% following other cerebral pathologies.5 The most consistent observation is that patients with PSH are frequently young and comatose. Pediatric patients appear more prone to develop PSH after anoxic–ischemic insults and with non-bacterial encephalitis.6 It is common that patients with PSH are erroneously suspected of having other diagnoses, and this may lead to unnecessary testing and sometimes inappropriate treatments, making an early and accurate diagnosis important.7 PSH may persist for weeks or months, and has been associated with worse clinical outcomes such as increased time of mechanical ventilation,\",\"PeriodicalId\":16574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感染、营养不良、脱水、气管造口术、住院时间更长、重症监护室(ICU)停留时间更长、挛缩和异位骨化。PSH仍然是一种认识不足、难以诊断的疾病。高度怀疑是早期诊断的关键。诊断的第一步是排除有类似症状的情况,如感染、镇静戒断、癫痫发作和肺栓塞。已经提出了临床诊断工具(PSH评估指标),以帮助临床医生可靠地识别PSH。8这些工具包括一个临床特征量表,用于对发作期间交感神经体征的严重程度进行分类,以及一个诊断工具,用于根据特征特征的存在来衡量诊断PSH的可能性。将这两个组成部分组合在一个分数中,该分数反映了PSH诊断的置信度。van Eijck等人最近验证了这些工具的可行性和可靠性。9有证据表明,它们可以减少误诊的机会,并对住院时间和住院成本产生有利影响。10对PSH的病理生理学了解甚少,主流理论认为中枢自主神经网络失效。下行通路的破坏释放了正常抑制性调节的交感神经反应。其结果是交感神经对内部或外部刺激的反应被夸大了。11下行抑制性调节的中断也可能在脊髓中产生不适应的变化,导致兴奋性中间神经元活动。12这些变化可能有助于解释大脑如何将非伤害性刺激视为伤害性刺激。12尽管治疗的正式证据不足并且缺乏方法学质量,PSH是一种可以治疗的疾病。13药物干预可以预防发作吗?至少有一项回顾性研究证明了这一点。唐等人断言,右美托咪定输注具有阵发性交感神经过度活跃(PSH),这是一种对伤害性或非伤害性(包括环境)刺激的肾上腺素能输出过多和病理性的综合征。它被观察为各种急性脑损伤的并发症,如创伤性脑损伤(TBI)、中风、缺氧性脑损伤、肿瘤、感染、自身免疫性脑炎和急性脑积水。它可以表现为一系列发作性的同时症状,如心动过速、体温过高、高血压、呼吸急促和发汗,通常伴有肌张力障碍甚至运动姿势。1这些症状的发作通常很快,但消退很慢,除非通过药物终止。自Penfield首次描述该综合征以来,已有2许多名称被赋予该综合征,这给其诊断和对其病理生理学的理解带来了困惑。多年来,与这种疾病相关的一些名称是“自主神经风暴”、“交感神经风暴”,“下丘脑调节障碍综合征”和“阵发性自主神经不稳定伴肌张力障碍”。2014年,国际脑损伤协会提出了“阵发性交感神经过度活跃”一词。“3在接受神经重症监护的不同患者群体中,其总发病率为18%,在严重TBI患者中的发病率为33%。4根据Perkes等人的研究,80%的PSH病例是在TBI后观察到的,其余20%是在其他脑病理后观察到。5最一致的观察结果是,PSH患者往往年轻且昏迷。儿童患者在缺氧-缺血性损伤和非细菌性脑炎后似乎更容易发展为PSH。6 PSH患者通常被错误地怀疑有其他诊断,这可能导致不必要的检测,有时甚至不适当的治疗,因此早期准确的诊断很重要。7 PSH可能会持续数周或数月,并且与更差的临床结果相关,例如机械通气时间增加,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity: Ignoring the Presence of an Elephant in the Room
infection, malnutrition, dehydration, tracheostomy, longer hospitalization longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays, contractures, and heterotopic ossification. PSH remains an under-recognized condition that is difficult to diagnose. A high index of suspicion is key to early diagnosis. The first step in diagnosis is to exclude conditions with similar symptoms, such as infection, sedation withdrawal, seizures, and pulmonary embolism. Clinical diagnostic tools (PSH assessment measure) have been proposed to assist clinicians in the reliable identification of PSH.8 Such tools incorporate a clinical feature scale that categorizes the severity of sympathetic signs during episodes and a diagnostic tool that gauges the likelihood of diagnosis of PSH based on the presence of characteristic features. These two components are combined in a score that reflects the degree of confidence in diagnosis of PSH. The feasibility and reliability of these tools have been recently validated by van Eijck et al.9 There is evidence that they may reduce the chances of misdiagnosis and favorably impact hospital length of stay and costs of hospitalization.10 The pathophysiology of PSH is poorly understood and the dominant theory suggests the failure of the central autonomic network. Disruption of descending pathways releases sympathetic responses from their normal inhibitory modulation. The consequence is that sympathetic responses to internal or external stimuli become exaggerated.11 The interruption of descending inhibitory modulation might also produce maladaptive changes in the spinal cord leading to excitatory interneuronal activity.12 These changes could help explain how non-noxious stimuli are perceived as noxious by brain.12 While formal evidence on treatment is scant and lacks methodological quality, PSH is a disorder that can be treated.13 Can episodes be prevented with pharmacological intervention? There is at least one retrospective study that claims so. Tang et al asserted that dexmedetomidine infusion has Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) is a syndrome of excessive and pathological adrenergic output to nociceptive or non-nociceptive (including environmental) stimuli. It is observed as a complication of various acute brain insults such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, anoxic brain injury, tumors, infections, autoimmune encephalitis, and acute hydrocephalus. It can manifest as a constellation of episodic, simultaneous symptoms such as tachycardia, hyperthermia, hypertension, tachypnea, and diaphoresis, often accompanied by dystonia and even motor posturing.1 Onset of these symptoms is usually fast, but resolution is slow, unless terminated by medication. Since the first description of this syndrome by Penfield,2 many names have been ascribed to it which has created puzzlement in its diagnosis as well as understanding of its pathophysiology. Some of the names associated with this condition over the years are “autonomic storm,” “sympathetic storm,” “hypothalamic dysregulation syndrome,” and “paroxysmal autonomic instability with dystonia.” In 2014, the International Brain Injury Association proposed the term “paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity.”3 Its overall incidence is 18% among various cohorts of patients admitted in neurocritical care with an incidence of 33% in severe TBI patients.4 According to Perkes et al, 80% of cases of PSH are observed after TBI, and the remaining 20% following other cerebral pathologies.5 The most consistent observation is that patients with PSH are frequently young and comatose. Pediatric patients appear more prone to develop PSH after anoxic–ischemic insults and with non-bacterial encephalitis.6 It is common that patients with PSH are erroneously suspected of having other diagnoses, and this may lead to unnecessary testing and sometimes inappropriate treatments, making an early and accurate diagnosis important.7 PSH may persist for weeks or months, and has been associated with worse clinical outcomes such as increased time of mechanical ventilation,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy for Management of Postoperative Pneumocephalus Perioperative Outcomes of Hyperlactatemia during Craniotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1,832 Patients Failure of Sequential Compression Device Detected by Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Posterior Scoliosis Surgery Persistent Post-Extubation Stridor in an Intensive Care Unit: A Decision Dilemma Awake Aneurysm Clipping: Challenges Conquered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1