反TERF:反白人民族主义项目的跨性别女性主义——引言

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Womens Studies in Communication Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/07491409.2023.2193535
Lore/tta LeMaster
{"title":"反TERF:反白人民族主义项目的跨性别女性主义——引言","authors":"Lore/tta LeMaster","doi":"10.1080/07491409.2023.2193535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When I obtained my bachelor’s in women’s studies in the early aughts, trans-exclusionary radical feminism (TERF) was not yet named as such, though its ideological origins certainly animated my requisite training in what has come to be variously termed women’s, gender, and sexuality studies. Despite its early 1990s emergence, works in transgender studies were not yet included in my requisite training as a major in women’s studies at the time. The proper object of study was, well, “women”; and the ways “male feminists” supported “women.” In this ontoepistemic context, “transgender” emerged as the butt of a joke, a pedagogical foil, or poised as an existential threat to the category of “woman” itself—the question of “transition” conceptualized as mutilation or confusion at best, a postmodern perversion of scientific achievement at worst. As a genderqueer person with trans yearnings, laboring in feminist struggle necessarily required concurrent unlearning.","PeriodicalId":46136,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies in Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-TERF: Trans Feminisms against White Nationalist Projects—Introductory Remarks\",\"authors\":\"Lore/tta LeMaster\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07491409.2023.2193535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When I obtained my bachelor’s in women’s studies in the early aughts, trans-exclusionary radical feminism (TERF) was not yet named as such, though its ideological origins certainly animated my requisite training in what has come to be variously termed women’s, gender, and sexuality studies. Despite its early 1990s emergence, works in transgender studies were not yet included in my requisite training as a major in women’s studies at the time. The proper object of study was, well, “women”; and the ways “male feminists” supported “women.” In this ontoepistemic context, “transgender” emerged as the butt of a joke, a pedagogical foil, or poised as an existential threat to the category of “woman” itself—the question of “transition” conceptualized as mutilation or confusion at best, a postmodern perversion of scientific achievement at worst. As a genderqueer person with trans yearnings, laboring in feminist struggle necessarily required concurrent unlearning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Studies in Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Studies in Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2023.2193535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2023.2193535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我在20世纪初获得女性研究学士学位时,排除跨性别的激进女权主义(TERF)还没有被这样命名,尽管它的意识形态起源确实激发了我在后来被各种各样地称为女性、性别和性研究的必要训练。尽管跨性别研究在20世纪90年代初出现,但当时我作为女性研究专业的学生,还没有接受过必要的培训。恰当的研究对象是“女性”;以及“男性女权主义者”支持“女性”的方式。在这种本体认识论的背景下,“跨性别者”成为笑柄,成为教学上的陪衬,或者成为对“女性”这一范畴本身存在的威胁——“过渡”的问题往好了说被概念化为残害或困惑,往坏了说是对科学成就的后现代曲解。作为一个渴望跨性别的性别酷儿,在女权主义斗争中工作必然需要同时忘却。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anti-TERF: Trans Feminisms against White Nationalist Projects—Introductory Remarks
When I obtained my bachelor’s in women’s studies in the early aughts, trans-exclusionary radical feminism (TERF) was not yet named as such, though its ideological origins certainly animated my requisite training in what has come to be variously termed women’s, gender, and sexuality studies. Despite its early 1990s emergence, works in transgender studies were not yet included in my requisite training as a major in women’s studies at the time. The proper object of study was, well, “women”; and the ways “male feminists” supported “women.” In this ontoepistemic context, “transgender” emerged as the butt of a joke, a pedagogical foil, or poised as an existential threat to the category of “woman” itself—the question of “transition” conceptualized as mutilation or confusion at best, a postmodern perversion of scientific achievement at worst. As a genderqueer person with trans yearnings, laboring in feminist struggle necessarily required concurrent unlearning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Palestine on the Air Feminist Mentoring in Academia Grassroots Activisms: Public Rhetorics in Localized Contexts Mean Girl Feminism Mommy Needs Her Chardonnay in a Sippy Cup: How Mothers Make Sense of “Wine Mom” Messages and Their Effects on Mothering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1