{"title":"哈利和菲利普","authors":"Emily A. Kuriloff","doi":"10.1080/00107530.2022.2140579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article begins with a review of Philip Bromberg’s penultimate psychoanalytic essay, “Sullivan as Pragmatic Visionary, Operationist and OperRelationalist” (2014), in which he honors the founder of the interpersonal psychoanalytic tradition. His focus on Sullivan’s emotional experience—specifically his struggle to be fully himself—reveals both motives and impediments to his interpersonal theory and praxis. The discussion then turns to Philip himself, who—inspired by Sullivan—also privileges the quality of relatedness in the moment, but with a significant difference. Rather than distortions or gaps in reality that impede insight, Philip favors affect, honoring Sullivan’s core notion that the quality of relatedness is central to personal change. Philip’s life both in and out of the consulting room is a testament to this sensibility and is ultimately illustrated in the author’s own experiences with Bromberg as Supervisor, Mentor, and, finally, as Dear Friend.","PeriodicalId":46058,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","volume":"58 1","pages":"391 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harry and Philip\",\"authors\":\"Emily A. Kuriloff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00107530.2022.2140579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article begins with a review of Philip Bromberg’s penultimate psychoanalytic essay, “Sullivan as Pragmatic Visionary, Operationist and OperRelationalist” (2014), in which he honors the founder of the interpersonal psychoanalytic tradition. His focus on Sullivan’s emotional experience—specifically his struggle to be fully himself—reveals both motives and impediments to his interpersonal theory and praxis. The discussion then turns to Philip himself, who—inspired by Sullivan—also privileges the quality of relatedness in the moment, but with a significant difference. Rather than distortions or gaps in reality that impede insight, Philip favors affect, honoring Sullivan’s core notion that the quality of relatedness is central to personal change. Philip’s life both in and out of the consulting room is a testament to this sensibility and is ultimately illustrated in the author’s own experiences with Bromberg as Supervisor, Mentor, and, finally, as Dear Friend.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"391 - 399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2022.2140579\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2022.2140579","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文首先回顾了Philip Bromberg的倒数第二篇精神分析论文《Sullivan as Pragmatic Visionary, Operationist and OperRelationalist》(2014),在这篇文章中,他向人际精神分析传统的创始人致敬。他对沙利文情感经历的关注——特别是他为完全做自己所做的努力——揭示了他人际关系理论和实践的动机和障碍。然后,讨论转向菲利普本人,他受沙利文的启发,也享受着当下的亲缘关系,但却有着显著的不同。比起现实中阻碍洞察力的扭曲或差距,菲利普更喜欢影响,尊重沙利文的核心理念,即关系的质量是个人改变的核心。菲利普在咨询室内外的生活证明了这种敏感性,并最终在作者与布朗伯格作为导师,导师,最后作为亲爱的朋友的亲身经历中得到了说明。
Abstract This article begins with a review of Philip Bromberg’s penultimate psychoanalytic essay, “Sullivan as Pragmatic Visionary, Operationist and OperRelationalist” (2014), in which he honors the founder of the interpersonal psychoanalytic tradition. His focus on Sullivan’s emotional experience—specifically his struggle to be fully himself—reveals both motives and impediments to his interpersonal theory and praxis. The discussion then turns to Philip himself, who—inspired by Sullivan—also privileges the quality of relatedness in the moment, but with a significant difference. Rather than distortions or gaps in reality that impede insight, Philip favors affect, honoring Sullivan’s core notion that the quality of relatedness is central to personal change. Philip’s life both in and out of the consulting room is a testament to this sensibility and is ultimately illustrated in the author’s own experiences with Bromberg as Supervisor, Mentor, and, finally, as Dear Friend.