葡萄园土壤钾有效性评价方法的改进

Jaclyn C. Fiola, Ryan D. Stewart, Greg K. Evanylo
{"title":"葡萄园土壤钾有效性评价方法的改进","authors":"Jaclyn C. Fiola,&nbsp;Ryan D. Stewart,&nbsp;Greg K. Evanylo","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vineyard soils often contain mineralogy that can confound predictions of plant-available potassium (K). Too little or too much K uptake into wine-grape (<i>Vitis</i> varieties) tissues can negatively affect fruit chemistry, making it important to have soil tests that accurately quantify plant-available K. Our goal was to determine the best soil sampling, processing, and extraction methods for predicting K availability in vineyard soils. We sampled soil and grapevine tissue in 39 vineyard blocks from 22 vineyards in Virginia, Maryland, and New Jersey. Plant tissue sampling included petioles at bloom and both petioles and leaf blades at veraison. Soil samples were collected from 0 to 10- and 0 to 38-cm depths. We tested three soil extraction methods—Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3, and sodium tetraphenylboron (NaTPB)—on both oven-dried and field-moist samples. The different sampling, processing, and extracting procedures produced distinct K concentrations, with shallow 0–10 cm samples and NaTPB extraction resulting in higher K concentrations than their counterparts. Upon drying, three soils fixed K and 24 samples released K. Whole leaf (petiole plus leaf blade) samples collected at veraison had the best relationships with most soil K concentrations. The best soil testing method for predicting tissue K concentration in whole leaves at veraison was Mehlich 1 extractions of field-moist soils from 0 to 38-cm depth. This sampling combination appears to be best suited for growers to use when assessing K concentrations in vineyard soils.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 3","pages":"669-681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20522","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving methods for evaluating potassium availability in vineyard soils\",\"authors\":\"Jaclyn C. Fiola,&nbsp;Ryan D. Stewart,&nbsp;Greg K. Evanylo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Vineyard soils often contain mineralogy that can confound predictions of plant-available potassium (K). Too little or too much K uptake into wine-grape (<i>Vitis</i> varieties) tissues can negatively affect fruit chemistry, making it important to have soil tests that accurately quantify plant-available K. Our goal was to determine the best soil sampling, processing, and extraction methods for predicting K availability in vineyard soils. We sampled soil and grapevine tissue in 39 vineyard blocks from 22 vineyards in Virginia, Maryland, and New Jersey. Plant tissue sampling included petioles at bloom and both petioles and leaf blades at veraison. Soil samples were collected from 0 to 10- and 0 to 38-cm depths. We tested three soil extraction methods—Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3, and sodium tetraphenylboron (NaTPB)—on both oven-dried and field-moist samples. The different sampling, processing, and extracting procedures produced distinct K concentrations, with shallow 0–10 cm samples and NaTPB extraction resulting in higher K concentrations than their counterparts. Upon drying, three soils fixed K and 24 samples released K. Whole leaf (petiole plus leaf blade) samples collected at veraison had the best relationships with most soil K concentrations. The best soil testing method for predicting tissue K concentration in whole leaves at veraison was Mehlich 1 extractions of field-moist soils from 0 to 38-cm depth. This sampling combination appears to be best suited for growers to use when assessing K concentrations in vineyard soils.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":\"87 3\",\"pages\":\"669-681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20522\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

葡萄园土壤通常含有矿物学,这可能会混淆植物速效钾(K)的预测。葡萄酒葡萄(葡萄品种)组织吸收钾过少或过多都会对果实化学产生负面影响,因此进行准确量化植物速效钾的土壤测试非常重要。我们的目标是确定预测葡萄园土壤钾有效性的最佳土壤采样、处理和提取方法。我们在弗吉尼亚州、马里兰州和新泽西州的22个葡萄园中对39个葡萄园区的土壤和葡萄组织进行了采样。植物组织取样包括花期叶柄和花期叶柄和叶片。土壤样品采集深度为0 ~ 10 cm和0 ~ 38 cm。我们测试了三种土壤提取方法——Mehlich 1、Mehlich 3和四苯基硼钠(NaTPB)——在烘箱干燥和田间潮湿的样品上。不同的采样、处理和提取程序产生不同的K浓度,浅0-10厘米样品和NaTPB提取产生的K浓度高于其他方法。干燥后,3个土壤固定钾,24个土壤释放钾,全叶(叶柄加叶片)样品与土壤钾浓度关系最好。预测全叶组织钾浓度的最佳土壤试验方法是在0 ~ 38 cm深的田间湿润土壤中提取Mehlich 1。这种采样组合似乎最适合种植者在评估葡萄园土壤中的钾浓度时使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving methods for evaluating potassium availability in vineyard soils

Vineyard soils often contain mineralogy that can confound predictions of plant-available potassium (K). Too little or too much K uptake into wine-grape (Vitis varieties) tissues can negatively affect fruit chemistry, making it important to have soil tests that accurately quantify plant-available K. Our goal was to determine the best soil sampling, processing, and extraction methods for predicting K availability in vineyard soils. We sampled soil and grapevine tissue in 39 vineyard blocks from 22 vineyards in Virginia, Maryland, and New Jersey. Plant tissue sampling included petioles at bloom and both petioles and leaf blades at veraison. Soil samples were collected from 0 to 10- and 0 to 38-cm depths. We tested three soil extraction methods—Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3, and sodium tetraphenylboron (NaTPB)—on both oven-dried and field-moist samples. The different sampling, processing, and extracting procedures produced distinct K concentrations, with shallow 0–10 cm samples and NaTPB extraction resulting in higher K concentrations than their counterparts. Upon drying, three soils fixed K and 24 samples released K. Whole leaf (petiole plus leaf blade) samples collected at veraison had the best relationships with most soil K concentrations. The best soil testing method for predicting tissue K concentration in whole leaves at veraison was Mehlich 1 extractions of field-moist soils from 0 to 38-cm depth. This sampling combination appears to be best suited for growers to use when assessing K concentrations in vineyard soils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of long-term nighttime warming on carbon storage and nitrogen retention of calcareous soil profiles in wheatland Microtopography controls organic and inorganic carbon stocks in Vertisols: Insights from a climosequence on the Texas coastal plain Impact of soil core preparation on hydraulic properties and modeled carbon cycling across texture classes Cover crop can offset negative effects of corn silage harvest on soils in a corn silage–soybean rotation Numerical analysis of slope stability in granite residual soil under rainfall conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1