超越包容:解读中国对印太地区建设的拒绝

A. Jaknanihan
{"title":"超越包容:解读中国对印太地区建设的拒绝","authors":"A. Jaknanihan","doi":"10.7454/global.v24i1.667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of “Indo-Pacific” has been increasingly adopted in foreign policies during the past few years. Despite its multifaceted nature, China has consistently rejected the use of the Indo-Pacific concept in its official policy. Beijing’s attitude was reflected in Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s remarks that dismissed the Indo-Pacific as a “come-back of Cold War mentality” and “retrogression of history.” This study explains why China renounced the Indo-Pacific concept despite the increasing inclusion in defining the region. By employing realist constructivism theory, this paper finds that the prevalence of containment and anti-China narrative engenders Beijing’s threat perception to the concept. The dominant narratives in China’s regional strategy, such as “community of common destiny,” also affect how the country treats the Indo-Pacific as a Western-centric concept, aimed to limit China’s influence. Beyond seeking inclusion from the Indo-Pacific conception, China advances its own vision to the region. China’s vision is projected through the Belt and Road Initiatives and various concepts to shape regional order in Beijing's preference.","PeriodicalId":32472,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Inclusion: Explaining China's Rejection on the Indo-Pacific Regional Construct\",\"authors\":\"A. Jaknanihan\",\"doi\":\"10.7454/global.v24i1.667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of “Indo-Pacific” has been increasingly adopted in foreign policies during the past few years. Despite its multifaceted nature, China has consistently rejected the use of the Indo-Pacific concept in its official policy. Beijing’s attitude was reflected in Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s remarks that dismissed the Indo-Pacific as a “come-back of Cold War mentality” and “retrogression of history.” This study explains why China renounced the Indo-Pacific concept despite the increasing inclusion in defining the region. By employing realist constructivism theory, this paper finds that the prevalence of containment and anti-China narrative engenders Beijing’s threat perception to the concept. The dominant narratives in China’s regional strategy, such as “community of common destiny,” also affect how the country treats the Indo-Pacific as a Western-centric concept, aimed to limit China’s influence. Beyond seeking inclusion from the Indo-Pacific conception, China advances its own vision to the region. China’s vision is projected through the Belt and Road Initiatives and various concepts to shape regional order in Beijing's preference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v24i1.667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v24i1.667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去几年中,“印太”的概念越来越多地被用于外交政策。尽管其性质是多方面的,但中国一直拒绝在其官方政策中使用印太概念。北京的态度反映在中国外交部长王毅的言论中,他将印太地区斥为“冷战思维的回归”和“历史的倒退”。这项研究解释了为什么中国在定义该地区时越来越多地加入了印太概念。本文运用现实主义建构主义理论,发现遏制和反华叙事的盛行导致了北京对这一概念的威胁感知。中国地区战略中的主导叙事,如“命运共同体”,也影响了该国如何将印太视为一个以西方为中心的概念,旨在限制中国的影响力。除了从印太概念中寻求包容性之外,中国还向该地区推进了自己的愿景。中国的愿景是通过一带一路倡议和各种概念来塑造北京偏好的区域秩序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond Inclusion: Explaining China's Rejection on the Indo-Pacific Regional Construct
The concept of “Indo-Pacific” has been increasingly adopted in foreign policies during the past few years. Despite its multifaceted nature, China has consistently rejected the use of the Indo-Pacific concept in its official policy. Beijing’s attitude was reflected in Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s remarks that dismissed the Indo-Pacific as a “come-back of Cold War mentality” and “retrogression of history.” This study explains why China renounced the Indo-Pacific concept despite the increasing inclusion in defining the region. By employing realist constructivism theory, this paper finds that the prevalence of containment and anti-China narrative engenders Beijing’s threat perception to the concept. The dominant narratives in China’s regional strategy, such as “community of common destiny,” also affect how the country treats the Indo-Pacific as a Western-centric concept, aimed to limit China’s influence. Beyond seeking inclusion from the Indo-Pacific conception, China advances its own vision to the region. China’s vision is projected through the Belt and Road Initiatives and various concepts to shape regional order in Beijing's preference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
TURNING UBUD INTO UNWTO'S PROTOTYPE FOR A WORLD GASTRONOMIC DESTINATION THROUGH GASTRODIPLOMACY ASEAN’S ROLE IN THE REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP) FORMATION TO ENHANCE REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION A CONSTRUCTIVIST ANALYSIS OF CHINA’S GEOPOLITICAL ECONOMIC STRATEGY TOWARD AFRICA: A CASE OF SINO-TANZANIAN SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION MIDDLE POWER AND SYMBOLIC POWER IN CLIMATE CHANGE NEGOTIATIONS: THE CASE OF INDONESIA’S STRATEGY IN THE KATOWICE CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE FROM RIVALS TO PARTNERS: THE EVOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION AMONG CHINA, JAPAN, AND KOREA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1