使用RVM、GPR和MPMR确定岩石碎片的大小

IF 1.1 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soils and Rocks Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.28927/sr.2022.008122
Pradeep Thangavel, P. Samui
{"title":"使用RVM、GPR和MPMR确定岩石碎片的大小","authors":"Pradeep Thangavel, P. Samui","doi":"10.28927/sr.2022.008122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For predicting the size of rock fragments during drilling and blasting operations, this article uses GPR, RVM, and MPMR. The current analysis makes use of a blast data set generated in a prior investigation. In this study, a portion of the blast data was utilized to train a model to determine the mean particle size arising from blast fragmentation for each of the similarity groups generated. The particle size was modeled as a function of seven different variables. The dataset contains information about the bench height and drilled burden ratio (H / B), spacing to burden ratio (S / B), burden to hole diameter ratio (B / D), stemming to burden ratio (T / B), powder factor (Pf ), modulus of elasticity (E), and in-situ block size (XB) are the input and output is X50. By comparing forecasts with actual mean particle size values and predictions based on one of the most widely used fragmentation estimation techniques in the blasted literature, the capacity of the generated models may be established. The statistical parameters, actual vs predicted curve, Taylor diagram, error bar, and developed discrepancy ratio are used to analysis the performance of models. A comparative study has been carried out between the developed RVM, GPR, and MPMR. The results show the developed models have the capability for prediction of X50. From these comparisons, the MPMR has the highest value with a high degree of precision and robustness in the size of rock fragments X50.","PeriodicalId":43687,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Rocks","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of the size of rock fragments using RVM, GPR, and MPMR\",\"authors\":\"Pradeep Thangavel, P. Samui\",\"doi\":\"10.28927/sr.2022.008122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For predicting the size of rock fragments during drilling and blasting operations, this article uses GPR, RVM, and MPMR. The current analysis makes use of a blast data set generated in a prior investigation. In this study, a portion of the blast data was utilized to train a model to determine the mean particle size arising from blast fragmentation for each of the similarity groups generated. The particle size was modeled as a function of seven different variables. The dataset contains information about the bench height and drilled burden ratio (H / B), spacing to burden ratio (S / B), burden to hole diameter ratio (B / D), stemming to burden ratio (T / B), powder factor (Pf ), modulus of elasticity (E), and in-situ block size (XB) are the input and output is X50. By comparing forecasts with actual mean particle size values and predictions based on one of the most widely used fragmentation estimation techniques in the blasted literature, the capacity of the generated models may be established. The statistical parameters, actual vs predicted curve, Taylor diagram, error bar, and developed discrepancy ratio are used to analysis the performance of models. A comparative study has been carried out between the developed RVM, GPR, and MPMR. The results show the developed models have the capability for prediction of X50. From these comparisons, the MPMR has the highest value with a high degree of precision and robustness in the size of rock fragments X50.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Rocks\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Rocks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28927/sr.2022.008122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Rocks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28927/sr.2022.008122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了预测钻孔和爆破过程中岩石碎片的大小,本文使用了GPR、RVM和MPMR。目前的分析利用了先前调查中生成的爆破数据集。在这项研究中,一部分爆破数据被用来训练一个模型,以确定产生的每个相似组的爆破碎片产生的平均粒径。颗粒大小被建模为七个不同变量的函数。该数据集包含有关台阶高度和钻孔负载比(H/B)、间距负载比(S/B)、负载孔径比(B/D)、堵塞负载比(T/B)、粉末系数(Pf)、弹性模量(E)和现场块体尺寸(XB)的信息。输入和输出为X50。通过将预测与实际平均粒径值以及基于爆破文献中最广泛使用的碎片估计技术之一的预测进行比较,可以建立生成的模型的容量。统计参数、实际与预测曲线、泰勒图、误差条和发展的差异率用于分析模型的性能。对所开发的RVM、GPR和MPMR进行了比较研究。结果表明,所建立的模型具有预测X50的能力。根据这些比较,MPMR在岩石碎片X50的尺寸方面具有最高的精度和稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determination of the size of rock fragments using RVM, GPR, and MPMR
For predicting the size of rock fragments during drilling and blasting operations, this article uses GPR, RVM, and MPMR. The current analysis makes use of a blast data set generated in a prior investigation. In this study, a portion of the blast data was utilized to train a model to determine the mean particle size arising from blast fragmentation for each of the similarity groups generated. The particle size was modeled as a function of seven different variables. The dataset contains information about the bench height and drilled burden ratio (H / B), spacing to burden ratio (S / B), burden to hole diameter ratio (B / D), stemming to burden ratio (T / B), powder factor (Pf ), modulus of elasticity (E), and in-situ block size (XB) are the input and output is X50. By comparing forecasts with actual mean particle size values and predictions based on one of the most widely used fragmentation estimation techniques in the blasted literature, the capacity of the generated models may be established. The statistical parameters, actual vs predicted curve, Taylor diagram, error bar, and developed discrepancy ratio are used to analysis the performance of models. A comparative study has been carried out between the developed RVM, GPR, and MPMR. The results show the developed models have the capability for prediction of X50. From these comparisons, the MPMR has the highest value with a high degree of precision and robustness in the size of rock fragments X50.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soils and Rocks
Soils and Rocks ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Soils and Rocks publishes papers in English in the broad fields of Geotechnical Engineering, Engineering Geology and Environmental Engineering. The Journal is published in April, August and December. The journal, with the name "Solos e Rochas", was first published in 1978 by the Graduate School of Engineering-Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (COPPE-UFRJ).
期刊最新文献
Discussion of “Systematic literature review and mapping of the prediction of pile capacities” Primary consolidation settlement due to ramp loading: Terzaghi (1943) method revisited Behavior of clayey soil treated with nano magnesium oxide material Numerical modeling of the behavior of a surface foundation located in the proximity of a slope Analysis of sorption/desorption of cadmium and lead in the legal amazon soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1