在Ma ā n?目前最新的可确定日期的米纳文文本和马基努的神

IF 0.7 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy Pub Date : 2021-02-28 DOI:10.1111/aae.12176
Jason Weimar
{"title":"在Ma ā n?目前最新的可确定日期的米纳文文本和马基努的神","authors":"Jason Weimar","doi":"10.1111/aae.12176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Historians of Ancient South Arabia have long questioned when the Minaean Kingdom collapsed and when the Minaean people disappeared thereafter. Scholarship presently leans towards dating the fall to sometime in the first century AD with the Minaeans dissipating shortly thereafter. Relevant for the question of the Minaeans’ disappearance is the Minaic RyIIIb stick inscription called L 53, which I decipher here. Based on a new paleographical dating system for RyIIIb inscriptions that I have developed, L 53 appears to date between the first to third centuries AD. This would make it the latest dateable Minaic text and quite possibly place its origins to after the fall of the Kingdom of Maʿīn. The text also contains the first attestations of the first person plural independent pronoun “we” <i>nḥn</i> in Ancient South Arabian in addition to a new divine moniker “the God of Maʿīn” (<i>ʾlh mʿn</i>). L 53 therefore might attest to a continuing Minaean linguistic and religious identity after the fall of their kingdom, which may be corroborated by Ptolemy’s statement that the Minaeans were a “great people” in the second century AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8124,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy","volume":"32 S1","pages":"376-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/aae.12176","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Minaeans after Maʿīn? The latest presently dateable Minaic text and the God of Maʿīn\",\"authors\":\"Jason Weimar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aae.12176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Historians of Ancient South Arabia have long questioned when the Minaean Kingdom collapsed and when the Minaean people disappeared thereafter. Scholarship presently leans towards dating the fall to sometime in the first century AD with the Minaeans dissipating shortly thereafter. Relevant for the question of the Minaeans’ disappearance is the Minaic RyIIIb stick inscription called L 53, which I decipher here. Based on a new paleographical dating system for RyIIIb inscriptions that I have developed, L 53 appears to date between the first to third centuries AD. This would make it the latest dateable Minaic text and quite possibly place its origins to after the fall of the Kingdom of Maʿīn. The text also contains the first attestations of the first person plural independent pronoun “we” <i>nḥn</i> in Ancient South Arabian in addition to a new divine moniker “the God of Maʿīn” (<i>ʾlh mʿn</i>). L 53 therefore might attest to a continuing Minaean linguistic and religious identity after the fall of their kingdom, which may be corroborated by Ptolemy’s statement that the Minaeans were a “great people” in the second century AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy\",\"volume\":\"32 S1\",\"pages\":\"376-387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/aae.12176\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aae.12176\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aae.12176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古南阿拉伯的历史学家长期以来一直质疑米奈王国何时崩溃以及米奈人何时消失。目前的学者倾向于认为米尼亚人的灭亡发生在公元一世纪的某个时候,此后不久米尼亚人就消失了。与米纳斯人消失的问题相关的是米纳斯人的RyIIIb棍棒铭文,称为l53,我在这里破译。根据我开发的一种新的RyIIIb铭文古地理年代测定系统,l53的年代似乎在公元1世纪到3世纪之间。这将使它成为最新的可确定日期的Minaic文本,并且很可能将其起源置于Ma ā n王国灭亡之后。文本还包含了第一人称复数独立代词“我们”nḥn在古代南阿拉伯除了一个新的神圣的绰号“神的马·穆·n”的第一个证明。因此,l53可能证明了米奈人的语言和宗教身份在他们的王国灭亡后仍在继续,这可能被托勒密在公元2世纪所说的米奈人是一个“伟大的民族”所证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Minaeans after Maʿīn? The latest presently dateable Minaic text and the God of Maʿīn

Historians of Ancient South Arabia have long questioned when the Minaean Kingdom collapsed and when the Minaean people disappeared thereafter. Scholarship presently leans towards dating the fall to sometime in the first century AD with the Minaeans dissipating shortly thereafter. Relevant for the question of the Minaeans’ disappearance is the Minaic RyIIIb stick inscription called L 53, which I decipher here. Based on a new paleographical dating system for RyIIIb inscriptions that I have developed, L 53 appears to date between the first to third centuries AD. This would make it the latest dateable Minaic text and quite possibly place its origins to after the fall of the Kingdom of Maʿīn. The text also contains the first attestations of the first person plural independent pronoun “we” nḥn in Ancient South Arabian in addition to a new divine moniker “the God of Maʿīn” (ʾlh mʿn). L 53 therefore might attest to a continuing Minaean linguistic and religious identity after the fall of their kingdom, which may be corroborated by Ptolemy’s statement that the Minaeans were a “great people” in the second century AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: In recent years the Arabian peninsula has emerged as one of the major new frontiers of archaeological research in the Old World. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy is a forum for the publication of studies in the archaeology, epigraphy, numismatics, and early history of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen. Both original articles and short communications in English, French, and German are published, ranging in time from prehistory to the Islamic era.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A ritual building from the Umm an-Nar settlement, Dahwa 7 in al-Batinah Plain, Northeast Oman Bond of allegiance? The three lines on Dilmun seals The Nabataean monumental rock-cut tombs of Mughāyir Shuʿayb and al-Aṣīfir in the oasis of al-Badʿ (Saudi Arabia): Preliminary architectural study and spatial organisation of the necropolis A note on the trident mark, stone worship and cult practices in Southeast Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1