种族,民族和家庭税收:婚姻惩罚/奖励的许多阴影

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE National Tax Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-15 DOI:10.1086/724934
J. Alm, J. Leguizamon, Susane Leguizamon
{"title":"种族,民族和家庭税收:婚姻惩罚/奖励的许多阴影","authors":"J. Alm, J. Leguizamon, Susane Leguizamon","doi":"10.1086/724934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent events have increased the focus on racial justice. One aspect of this attention is the realization that race interacts in important — but often not fully understood — ways with taxation, including taxation of the family. In this paper, we quantify the racial disparity in the magnitude of the “marriage penalty” or “marriage bonus,” using individual micro-level data from the Current Population Survey for the years 1992–2019. We find that Black married couples nearly always face a higher averaged marriage penalty (or a smaller averaged marriage bonus) compared with white married couples, even when we compare couples with similar family earnings. This occurs primarily because the incomes of Black married couples tend to be more evenly split between spouses than the incomes of white married couples. The differences between white couples and Hispanic couples tend to be smaller, but nonetheless they are still present in many cases, with Hispanic couples also facing a marriage penalty. We conclude with suggestions for reform of the individual income tax that would reduce the disparate racial and ethnic treatments across families.","PeriodicalId":18983,"journal":{"name":"National Tax Journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"525 - 560"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Race, Ethnicity, and Taxation of the Family: The Many Shades of the Marriage Penalty/Bonus\",\"authors\":\"J. Alm, J. Leguizamon, Susane Leguizamon\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/724934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent events have increased the focus on racial justice. One aspect of this attention is the realization that race interacts in important — but often not fully understood — ways with taxation, including taxation of the family. In this paper, we quantify the racial disparity in the magnitude of the “marriage penalty” or “marriage bonus,” using individual micro-level data from the Current Population Survey for the years 1992–2019. We find that Black married couples nearly always face a higher averaged marriage penalty (or a smaller averaged marriage bonus) compared with white married couples, even when we compare couples with similar family earnings. This occurs primarily because the incomes of Black married couples tend to be more evenly split between spouses than the incomes of white married couples. The differences between white couples and Hispanic couples tend to be smaller, but nonetheless they are still present in many cases, with Hispanic couples also facing a marriage penalty. We conclude with suggestions for reform of the individual income tax that would reduce the disparate racial and ethnic treatments across families.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Tax Journal\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"525 - 560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Tax Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/724934\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Tax Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724934","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近发生的事件使人们更加关注种族正义。这种关注的一个方面是意识到种族与税收,包括对家庭的税收,以重要但往往不完全理解的方式相互作用。在本文中,我们使用1992-2019年当前人口调查的个人微观数据,量化了“婚姻惩罚”或“婚姻奖金”的种族差异。我们发现,与白人已婚夫妇相比,黑人已婚夫妇几乎总是面临更高的平均婚姻惩罚(或更小的平均婚姻奖金),即使我们比较家庭收入相似的夫妇也是如此。这主要是因为黑人已婚夫妇的收入在配偶之间的分配往往比白人已婚夫妇的平均。白人夫妇和西班牙裔夫妇之间的差异往往较小,但在许多情况下仍然存在,西班牙语夫妇也面临婚姻惩罚。最后,我们提出了个人所得税改革的建议,以减少不同家庭的种族和民族待遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Race, Ethnicity, and Taxation of the Family: The Many Shades of the Marriage Penalty/Bonus
Recent events have increased the focus on racial justice. One aspect of this attention is the realization that race interacts in important — but often not fully understood — ways with taxation, including taxation of the family. In this paper, we quantify the racial disparity in the magnitude of the “marriage penalty” or “marriage bonus,” using individual micro-level data from the Current Population Survey for the years 1992–2019. We find that Black married couples nearly always face a higher averaged marriage penalty (or a smaller averaged marriage bonus) compared with white married couples, even when we compare couples with similar family earnings. This occurs primarily because the incomes of Black married couples tend to be more evenly split between spouses than the incomes of white married couples. The differences between white couples and Hispanic couples tend to be smaller, but nonetheless they are still present in many cases, with Hispanic couples also facing a marriage penalty. We conclude with suggestions for reform of the individual income tax that would reduce the disparate racial and ethnic treatments across families.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The goal of the National Tax Journal (NTJ) is to encourage and disseminate high quality original research on governmental tax and expenditure policies. Articles published in the regular March, June and September issues of the journal, as well as articles accepted for publication in special issues of the journal, are subject to professional peer review and include economic, theoretical, and empirical analyses of tax and expenditure issues with an emphasis on policy implications. The NTJ has been published quarterly since 1948 under the auspices of the National Tax Association (NTA). Most issues include an NTJ Forum, which consists of invited papers by leading scholars that examine in depth a single current tax or expenditure policy issue. The December issue is devoted to publishing papers presented at the NTA’s annual Spring Symposium; the articles in the December issue generally are not subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
Territorial Tax Reform and Profit Shifting by Us and Japanese Multinationals Public Housing Authorities’ Housing Choice Voucher Policies Can Affect SSI Participation Three Decades of Tax Analysis, 1992–2022 Agenda-Setting and Tax Referenda: Implications for Regression Discontinuity Identification Strategy Using Election Outcomes Automated Tax Filing: Simulating a PrePopulated Form 1040
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1