将家庭护理人员重新定义为医疗团队的一部分

Amber L. Stephenson, Minakshi Raj, S. Thomas, E. Sullivan, Matthew J. Depuccio, Bram P. I. Fleuren, A. McAlearney
{"title":"将家庭护理人员重新定义为医疗团队的一部分","authors":"Amber L. Stephenson, Minakshi Raj, S. Thomas, E. Sullivan, Matthew J. Depuccio, Bram P. I. Fleuren, A. McAlearney","doi":"10.21037/jhmhp-21-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Family and friends who serve as caregivers are becoming increasingly important in supporting adults to complete various tasks such as transportation, shopping, and health care responsibilities like medication management (1). It is estimated that the number of adults older than 65 in the United States will nearly double in the next four decades (2), and over 80% of family caregivers of older adults are responsible for coordinating care between and among providers (3). However, the inclusion of these caregivers in the health care delivery process lacks recognition, coordination and standardization (4). Despite efforts to include caregivers (e.g., through informal or formal proxy access to their care recipient’s patient portal), policies and procedures around caregiver inclusion are complex and inconsistently implemented (5). One policy, the Caregiver Advise, Record, Enable (CARE) Act, was developed by AARP, then introduced to state legislatures, and is intended to provide designated caregivers with discharge instructions and guidance. The CARE Act, now signed into law by 40 states, aims to provide health care providers with practices that integrate caregivers into the process of care delivery, but has failed to be broadly implemented within health care organizations (6). A national survey of health care executives, clinical leaders, and clinicians about caring for caregivers found that 79% of respondents are either not very familiar or not at all familiar with the CARE Act (6). Medicaid waivers are intended to provide caregivers with training and, in some cases, compensation; yet these efforts are uncoordinated across the U.S. (5). Tools have also been developed to offer caregivers shared access to electronic health records. Yet a significant issue remains: how are caregivers ultimately included in the team itself? Understanding caregiver inclusion in healthcare teams is essential to maximize the benefits they have to offer for improving patient outcomes. Most centrally, team-based patient care can be understood as an information sharing/ distribution of expertise problem, in which the optimal care solution might depend on important information that is not shared among members of the care team (7). For instance, a patient may receive information about wound care from their doctor during a visit, but the caregiver responsible for overseeing the wound care may not directly receive those instructions from the provider. This type of communication gap may then result in negative patient outcomes. More dramatically, health care teams failing to adequately include the caregiver’s unique perspective may make suboptimal treatment decisions. In this commentary, we discuss considerations surrounding caregiver inclusion in health care teams and outline the implications of caregiver engagement for Editorial Commentary","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualizing family caregivers as part of the health care team\",\"authors\":\"Amber L. Stephenson, Minakshi Raj, S. Thomas, E. Sullivan, Matthew J. Depuccio, Bram P. I. Fleuren, A. McAlearney\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jhmhp-21-56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Family and friends who serve as caregivers are becoming increasingly important in supporting adults to complete various tasks such as transportation, shopping, and health care responsibilities like medication management (1). It is estimated that the number of adults older than 65 in the United States will nearly double in the next four decades (2), and over 80% of family caregivers of older adults are responsible for coordinating care between and among providers (3). However, the inclusion of these caregivers in the health care delivery process lacks recognition, coordination and standardization (4). Despite efforts to include caregivers (e.g., through informal or formal proxy access to their care recipient’s patient portal), policies and procedures around caregiver inclusion are complex and inconsistently implemented (5). One policy, the Caregiver Advise, Record, Enable (CARE) Act, was developed by AARP, then introduced to state legislatures, and is intended to provide designated caregivers with discharge instructions and guidance. The CARE Act, now signed into law by 40 states, aims to provide health care providers with practices that integrate caregivers into the process of care delivery, but has failed to be broadly implemented within health care organizations (6). A national survey of health care executives, clinical leaders, and clinicians about caring for caregivers found that 79% of respondents are either not very familiar or not at all familiar with the CARE Act (6). Medicaid waivers are intended to provide caregivers with training and, in some cases, compensation; yet these efforts are uncoordinated across the U.S. (5). Tools have also been developed to offer caregivers shared access to electronic health records. Yet a significant issue remains: how are caregivers ultimately included in the team itself? Understanding caregiver inclusion in healthcare teams is essential to maximize the benefits they have to offer for improving patient outcomes. Most centrally, team-based patient care can be understood as an information sharing/ distribution of expertise problem, in which the optimal care solution might depend on important information that is not shared among members of the care team (7). For instance, a patient may receive information about wound care from their doctor during a visit, but the caregiver responsible for overseeing the wound care may not directly receive those instructions from the provider. This type of communication gap may then result in negative patient outcomes. More dramatically, health care teams failing to adequately include the caregiver’s unique perspective may make suboptimal treatment decisions. In this commentary, we discuss considerations surrounding caregiver inclusion in health care teams and outline the implications of caregiver engagement for Editorial Commentary\",\"PeriodicalId\":92075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital management and health policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital management and health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-21-56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-21-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为照顾者的家人和朋友在支持成年人完成各种任务(如交通、购物和医疗保健责任,如药物管理)方面变得越来越重要(1)。据估计,在未来40年里,美国65岁以上的成年人数量将增加近一倍(2),超过80%的老年人家庭照顾者负责协调提供者之间和之间的护理(3)。将这些护理人员纳入医疗保健提供过程缺乏认可、协调和标准化(4)。尽管努力将护理人员纳入(例如,通过非正式或正式的代理访问其护理对象的患者门户),但围绕护理人员纳入的政策和程序复杂且执行不一致(5)。一项政策,即护理人员建议、记录、启用(care)法案,由美国退休人员协会制定,然后提交给州立法机构。目的是为指定的护理人员提供出院说明和指导。CARE法案,目前已被40个州签署成为法律,旨在为医疗保健提供者提供将护理人员纳入医疗服务过程的实践,但未能在医疗保健组织中广泛实施(6)。关于照顾护理人员的临床医生发现,79%的受访者要么不太熟悉,要么根本不熟悉CARE法案(6)。医疗补助豁免旨在为护理人员提供培训,并在某些情况下提供补偿;然而,这些努力在全美范围内还没有得到协调(5)。人们还开发了一些工具,让护理人员能够共享电子健康记录。然而,一个重要的问题仍然存在:护理人员最终如何被纳入团队本身?了解护理人员在医疗团队中的包容性对于最大限度地提高他们为改善患者预后所提供的好处至关重要。最重要的是,基于团队的患者护理可以理解为专业知识的信息共享/分配问题,其中最佳护理解决方案可能依赖于护理团队成员之间不共享的重要信息(7)。例如,患者可能在就诊期间从医生那里获得有关伤口护理的信息,但负责监督伤口护理的护理人员可能不会直接从提供者那里获得这些指示。这种类型的沟通差距可能会导致患者的负面结果。更戏剧性的是,医疗团队没有充分考虑到护理者的独特观点,可能会做出不理想的治疗决定。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了围绕护理人员纳入卫生保健团队的考虑因素,并概述了护理人员参与编辑评论的含义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reconceptualizing family caregivers as part of the health care team
Family and friends who serve as caregivers are becoming increasingly important in supporting adults to complete various tasks such as transportation, shopping, and health care responsibilities like medication management (1). It is estimated that the number of adults older than 65 in the United States will nearly double in the next four decades (2), and over 80% of family caregivers of older adults are responsible for coordinating care between and among providers (3). However, the inclusion of these caregivers in the health care delivery process lacks recognition, coordination and standardization (4). Despite efforts to include caregivers (e.g., through informal or formal proxy access to their care recipient’s patient portal), policies and procedures around caregiver inclusion are complex and inconsistently implemented (5). One policy, the Caregiver Advise, Record, Enable (CARE) Act, was developed by AARP, then introduced to state legislatures, and is intended to provide designated caregivers with discharge instructions and guidance. The CARE Act, now signed into law by 40 states, aims to provide health care providers with practices that integrate caregivers into the process of care delivery, but has failed to be broadly implemented within health care organizations (6). A national survey of health care executives, clinical leaders, and clinicians about caring for caregivers found that 79% of respondents are either not very familiar or not at all familiar with the CARE Act (6). Medicaid waivers are intended to provide caregivers with training and, in some cases, compensation; yet these efforts are uncoordinated across the U.S. (5). Tools have also been developed to offer caregivers shared access to electronic health records. Yet a significant issue remains: how are caregivers ultimately included in the team itself? Understanding caregiver inclusion in healthcare teams is essential to maximize the benefits they have to offer for improving patient outcomes. Most centrally, team-based patient care can be understood as an information sharing/ distribution of expertise problem, in which the optimal care solution might depend on important information that is not shared among members of the care team (7). For instance, a patient may receive information about wound care from their doctor during a visit, but the caregiver responsible for overseeing the wound care may not directly receive those instructions from the provider. This type of communication gap may then result in negative patient outcomes. More dramatically, health care teams failing to adequately include the caregiver’s unique perspective may make suboptimal treatment decisions. In this commentary, we discuss considerations surrounding caregiver inclusion in health care teams and outline the implications of caregiver engagement for Editorial Commentary
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in hospital market concentration and profitability: the case of New Jersey COVID-19 outbreak and integration of social media in public health crisis communication: a case study of UMMC, Kuala Lumpur Spatial disparities in flood vulnerability in New York City Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth Impact of COVID-19 on operation room utilization efficiency and cardiac surgery care pathway: single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1