2021年世界机器人大赛脑机接口控制机器人大赛跨学科脑电情感识别算法比较

Chao Tang, Yunhuan Li, Badong Chen
{"title":"2021年世界机器人大赛脑机接口控制机器人大赛跨学科脑电情感识别算法比较","authors":"Chao Tang, Yunhuan Li, Badong Chen","doi":"10.26599/BSA.2022.9050013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electroencephalogram (EEG) data depict various emotional states and reflect brain activity. There has been increasing interest in EEG emotion recognition in brain–computer interface systems (BCIs). In the World Robot Contest (WRC), the BCI Controlled Robot Contest successfully staged an emotion recognition technology competition. Three types of emotions (happy, sad, and neutral) are modeled using EEG signals. In this study, 5 methods employed by different teams are compared. The results reveal that classical machine learning approaches and deep learning methods perform similarly in offline recognition, whereas deep learning methods perform better in online cross-subject decoding.","PeriodicalId":67062,"journal":{"name":"Brain Science Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of cross-subject EEG emotion recognition algorithms in the BCI Controlled Robot Contest in World Robot Contest 2021\",\"authors\":\"Chao Tang, Yunhuan Li, Badong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.26599/BSA.2022.9050013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electroencephalogram (EEG) data depict various emotional states and reflect brain activity. There has been increasing interest in EEG emotion recognition in brain–computer interface systems (BCIs). In the World Robot Contest (WRC), the BCI Controlled Robot Contest successfully staged an emotion recognition technology competition. Three types of emotions (happy, sad, and neutral) are modeled using EEG signals. In this study, 5 methods employed by different teams are compared. The results reveal that classical machine learning approaches and deep learning methods perform similarly in offline recognition, whereas deep learning methods perform better in online cross-subject decoding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":67062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Science Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Science Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26599/BSA.2022.9050013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Science Advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26599/BSA.2022.9050013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

脑电图(EEG)数据描述各种情绪状态并反映大脑活动。脑机接口系统(bci)中EEG情绪识别的研究日益受到关注。在世界机器人大赛(WRC)中,BCI控制机器人大赛成功举办了情感识别技术比赛。三种类型的情绪(快乐,悲伤和中性)使用脑电图信号建模。在本研究中,比较了不同团队采用的5种方法。结果表明,经典机器学习方法和深度学习方法在离线识别中表现相似,而深度学习方法在在线跨主题解码中表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of cross-subject EEG emotion recognition algorithms in the BCI Controlled Robot Contest in World Robot Contest 2021
Electroencephalogram (EEG) data depict various emotional states and reflect brain activity. There has been increasing interest in EEG emotion recognition in brain–computer interface systems (BCIs). In the World Robot Contest (WRC), the BCI Controlled Robot Contest successfully staged an emotion recognition technology competition. Three types of emotions (happy, sad, and neutral) are modeled using EEG signals. In this study, 5 methods employed by different teams are compared. The results reveal that classical machine learning approaches and deep learning methods perform similarly in offline recognition, whereas deep learning methods perform better in online cross-subject decoding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A review of deep learning methods for cross-subject rapid serial visual presentation detection in World Robot Contest 2022 Overview of recognition methods for SSVEP-based BCIs in World Robot Contest 2022: MATLAB undergraduate group Algorithm contest of motor imagery BCI in the World Robot Contest 2022: A survey Winning algorithms in BCI Controlled Robot Contest in World Robot Contest 2022: BCI Turing Test Overview of the winning approaches in 2022 World Robot Contest Championship–Asynchronous SSVEP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1