受虐女性主义,或对白人女性主义工业情结的反思

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES Feminist Studies Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1353/fem.2022.0047
J. Nash
{"title":"受虐女性主义,或对白人女性主义工业情结的反思","authors":"J. Nash","doi":"10.1353/fem.2022.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This review essay examines three popular feminist texts that diagnose the problem of \"white feminism.\" I ask: how is it that a group of actors—white women—who are not visibly working under the mantle of feminism come to be claimed by feminists, by these authors, as evidence of feminism's own bad politics? While seeking to understand a narrative built around a capacious conception of feminism that then bemoans feminism itself, I also mark the masochistic impulse of contemporary feminist politics that I argue these books—and the markets around them—produce and represent. Each of these books are constructed around mapping a dangerous and toxic white feminine subjectivity that can be overcome only through white women's wholesale allegiance to Black feminist thought, and through their repeated willingness to abject themselves through accounts of their own enactments- knowing or unknowing- of violence. Taken together, these books (along with a slew of popular writing condemning white feminist behavior) reveal an industry in anti-white feminist writing that insists that white women accept the inevitability of their own harmfulness over and over again, repeatedly confronting the truth of their \"narcissism.\"","PeriodicalId":35884,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Masochistic Feminism, or Reflections on the White Feminist Industrial Complex\",\"authors\":\"J. Nash\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/fem.2022.0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This review essay examines three popular feminist texts that diagnose the problem of \\\"white feminism.\\\" I ask: how is it that a group of actors—white women—who are not visibly working under the mantle of feminism come to be claimed by feminists, by these authors, as evidence of feminism's own bad politics? While seeking to understand a narrative built around a capacious conception of feminism that then bemoans feminism itself, I also mark the masochistic impulse of contemporary feminist politics that I argue these books—and the markets around them—produce and represent. Each of these books are constructed around mapping a dangerous and toxic white feminine subjectivity that can be overcome only through white women's wholesale allegiance to Black feminist thought, and through their repeated willingness to abject themselves through accounts of their own enactments- knowing or unknowing- of violence. Taken together, these books (along with a slew of popular writing condemning white feminist behavior) reveal an industry in anti-white feminist writing that insists that white women accept the inevitability of their own harmfulness over and over again, repeatedly confronting the truth of their \\\"narcissism.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":35884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2022.0047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2022.0047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:这篇评论文章考察了三篇流行的女权主义文本,它们诊断了“白人女权主义”的问题。我想问:为什么女权主义者和这些作者声称,一群没有明显在女权主义外衣下工作的演员——白人女性——是女权主义自身糟糕政治的证据?在试图理解一种围绕着女权主义的广阔概念构建的叙事,然后哀叹女权主义本身的同时,我也注意到了当代女权主义政治的受虐冲动,我认为这些书——以及它们周围的市场——产生并代表了这种冲动。每一本书都是围绕着描绘一种危险而有毒的白人女性主体性而构建的,只有通过白人女性对黑人女权主义思想的全面忠诚,以及通过她们反复愿意通过讲述自己的暴力行为——无论是知道还是不知道——来贬低自己,才能克服这种主体性。总之,这些书(以及一系列谴责白人女权主义行为的流行作品)揭示了一个反白人女权主义写作行业,该行业坚持白人女性一次又一次地接受自己伤害的必然性,反复面对自己“自恋”的真相
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Masochistic Feminism, or Reflections on the White Feminist Industrial Complex
Abstract:This review essay examines three popular feminist texts that diagnose the problem of "white feminism." I ask: how is it that a group of actors—white women—who are not visibly working under the mantle of feminism come to be claimed by feminists, by these authors, as evidence of feminism's own bad politics? While seeking to understand a narrative built around a capacious conception of feminism that then bemoans feminism itself, I also mark the masochistic impulse of contemporary feminist politics that I argue these books—and the markets around them—produce and represent. Each of these books are constructed around mapping a dangerous and toxic white feminine subjectivity that can be overcome only through white women's wholesale allegiance to Black feminist thought, and through their repeated willingness to abject themselves through accounts of their own enactments- knowing or unknowing- of violence. Taken together, these books (along with a slew of popular writing condemning white feminist behavior) reveal an industry in anti-white feminist writing that insists that white women accept the inevitability of their own harmfulness over and over again, repeatedly confronting the truth of their "narcissism."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Studies
Feminist Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Pleasures of the Hunt / We Must Be Creatures: Toward an Ecofeminist Hunting Ethic What Hungers Call Us Home? Engaging Autotheory Through Food Legal Landscapes Post-Roe: Shifts in Antiabortion Violence and Implications of the face Act Oasis by Necessity: The Post-Dobbs Landscape in Central Illinois "Brutality and its aftermath": Autotheoretical Engagements with Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1