为包容性咨询、研究和政策制定做准备:来自聋人领域的见解

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES Journal of Social Inclusion Pub Date : 2018-08-31 DOI:10.36251/JOSI.132
Alana Roy, K. Mcvilly, B. Crisp
{"title":"为包容性咨询、研究和政策制定做准备:来自聋人领域的见解","authors":"Alana Roy, K. Mcvilly, B. Crisp","doi":"10.36251/JOSI.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a paucity of research and guidance on good practice for engaging with people who are Deafblind in policy development and the co-design of services and service systems. Although there are a range of inclusive research methodologies, such as the World Café, Deafblind people are yet to be engaged authentically and effectively in these conversations. To address this issue, and as part of a program of research to investigate and test good practice in this field, we analysed data from semi-structured interviews with eight Deafblindness professionals using inductive thematic analysis. Six themes emerged from the interview data. These were: (1) acknowledging the unique Deafblind world view; (2) the interplay of vulnerability and trusting relationships; (3) the importance of specialist knowledge, skills, and cultural sensitivities; (4) power to the people - addressing power imbalances inherent in consultation processes; (5) same but different – the Deafblind experience of being a culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) community, and; (6) a challenge that must be met – the imperative to involve people who are Deafblind in research and policy development. If people who are Deafblind are to be engaged in research and policy development, there are a number of guiding principles that need to be considered and practical actions to be taken. These principles include employing a culturally sensitive and trusted research team to spend time working with Deafblind people to help prepare and educate them for research and consultation processes. In so doing, people with lived experiences and professionals in the field can build the trust, knowledge and skills needed to enable authentic co-design and co-production of policy and practice.","PeriodicalId":42982,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Inclusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparing for inclusive consultation, research and policy development: insights from the field of Deafblindness\",\"authors\":\"Alana Roy, K. Mcvilly, B. Crisp\",\"doi\":\"10.36251/JOSI.132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a paucity of research and guidance on good practice for engaging with people who are Deafblind in policy development and the co-design of services and service systems. Although there are a range of inclusive research methodologies, such as the World Café, Deafblind people are yet to be engaged authentically and effectively in these conversations. To address this issue, and as part of a program of research to investigate and test good practice in this field, we analysed data from semi-structured interviews with eight Deafblindness professionals using inductive thematic analysis. Six themes emerged from the interview data. These were: (1) acknowledging the unique Deafblind world view; (2) the interplay of vulnerability and trusting relationships; (3) the importance of specialist knowledge, skills, and cultural sensitivities; (4) power to the people - addressing power imbalances inherent in consultation processes; (5) same but different – the Deafblind experience of being a culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) community, and; (6) a challenge that must be met – the imperative to involve people who are Deafblind in research and policy development. If people who are Deafblind are to be engaged in research and policy development, there are a number of guiding principles that need to be considered and practical actions to be taken. These principles include employing a culturally sensitive and trusted research team to spend time working with Deafblind people to help prepare and educate them for research and consultation processes. In so doing, people with lived experiences and professionals in the field can build the trust, knowledge and skills needed to enable authentic co-design and co-production of policy and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Inclusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Inclusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36251/JOSI.132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36251/JOSI.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在政策制定以及服务和服务系统的共同设计中,缺乏与聋人接触的良好做法的研究和指导。尽管有一系列包容性的研究方法,如世界咖啡馆,但聋人尚未真正有效地参与这些对话。为了解决这个问题,作为调查和测试该领域良好实践的研究计划的一部分,我们使用归纳主题分析对八名聋哑专业人士的半结构化访谈数据进行了分析。访谈数据中出现了六个主题。它们是:(1)承认聋人独特的世界观;(2) 脆弱性和信任关系的相互作用;(3) 专业知识、技能和文化敏感性的重要性;(4) 人民的权力-解决协商过程中固有的权力失衡问题;(5) 相同但不同——聋人作为一个文化和语言多样性(CALD)社区的经历,以及;(6) 这是一个必须应对的挑战&让聋人参与研究和政策制定的必要性。如果聋人要从事研究和政策制定,需要考虑一些指导原则,并采取实际行动。这些原则包括雇佣一个文化敏感和值得信赖的研究团队,花时间与聋哑人合作,帮助他们为研究和咨询过程做好准备和教育。通过这样做,在该领域有生活经验的人和专业人士可以建立所需的信任、知识和技能,从而实现政策和实践的真正共同设计和共同制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preparing for inclusive consultation, research and policy development: insights from the field of Deafblindness
There is a paucity of research and guidance on good practice for engaging with people who are Deafblind in policy development and the co-design of services and service systems. Although there are a range of inclusive research methodologies, such as the World Café, Deafblind people are yet to be engaged authentically and effectively in these conversations. To address this issue, and as part of a program of research to investigate and test good practice in this field, we analysed data from semi-structured interviews with eight Deafblindness professionals using inductive thematic analysis. Six themes emerged from the interview data. These were: (1) acknowledging the unique Deafblind world view; (2) the interplay of vulnerability and trusting relationships; (3) the importance of specialist knowledge, skills, and cultural sensitivities; (4) power to the people - addressing power imbalances inherent in consultation processes; (5) same but different – the Deafblind experience of being a culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) community, and; (6) a challenge that must be met – the imperative to involve people who are Deafblind in research and policy development. If people who are Deafblind are to be engaged in research and policy development, there are a number of guiding principles that need to be considered and practical actions to be taken. These principles include employing a culturally sensitive and trusted research team to spend time working with Deafblind people to help prepare and educate them for research and consultation processes. In so doing, people with lived experiences and professionals in the field can build the trust, knowledge and skills needed to enable authentic co-design and co-production of policy and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social Support As an Explanatory Mechanism of the Relationship Between Social Class and Mental Health in University Students: A Structural Mediation Model Loneliness as an unresolved issue in social inclusion programmes Not Leaving ‘Lone Migrant Mothers’ Behind: The Role of Place-based Childcare Support in Australia’s Marginalised Neighbourhoods Embracing or avoiding diversity? Yet another hostile policy against ‘non-Westerners’ in Denmark Like a Social Breath: Homecare’s Contributions to Social Inclusion and Connectedness of Older Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1