环境行为中的目标框架理论:综述、未来研究议程和在行为改变中的可能应用

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Social Marketing Pub Date : 2022-10-05 DOI:10.1108/jsocm-03-2021-0058
Natália Rohenkohl do Canto, K. Grunert, M. Dutra de Barcellos
{"title":"环境行为中的目标框架理论:综述、未来研究议程和在行为改变中的可能应用","authors":"Natália Rohenkohl do Canto, K. Grunert, M. Dutra de Barcellos","doi":"10.1108/jsocm-03-2021-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nPreserving the environment is fundamental to the planet’s long-term sustainability, but attempts to promote pro-environmental behaviours often do not take into account the motivational determinants of such behaviours. This study aims to present and critically evaluate the theoretical and empirical basis of goal-framing theory, which asserts that pro-environmental behaviours might stem from conflicting goals. This study compares the theory to other approaches used to explain pro-environmental behaviour, reviews the empirical evidence for it and comes up with suggestions for future research.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study compares the theory with other popular theories to explain pro-environmental behaviour and behaviour change and systematically review 25 empirical research studies that adopt the goal-framing theory.\n\n\nFindings\nMost studies rely on survey data, focus on Europe and gather self-reported behaviours or hypothetical responses. Furthermore, many studies of goal frames neglect key situational factors. Thus, the directions for further research outlined herein emphasise the need for more experimental studies of real behaviours, with consideration of situational factors, using methods that can explicate unconscious processes too. Overall, goal-framing theory provides a promising approach for analysing pro-environmental behaviours, in that it explicitly deals with goal conflicts, takes situational factors into account and encompasses conscious and unconscious processes. The authors conclude that the theory can form a useful basis for the design of social marketing behavioural interventions to promote pro-environmental behaviours.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, as the first systematic review of empirical applications of goal-framing theory, this study provides refinement and validation. By also offering propositions and a research agenda, the authors hope to inspire researchers in social marketing to address the remaining gaps and refine the theory even further.\n","PeriodicalId":51732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Goal-framing theory in environmental behaviours: review, future research agenda and possible applications in behavioural change\",\"authors\":\"Natália Rohenkohl do Canto, K. Grunert, M. Dutra de Barcellos\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jsocm-03-2021-0058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nPreserving the environment is fundamental to the planet’s long-term sustainability, but attempts to promote pro-environmental behaviours often do not take into account the motivational determinants of such behaviours. This study aims to present and critically evaluate the theoretical and empirical basis of goal-framing theory, which asserts that pro-environmental behaviours might stem from conflicting goals. This study compares the theory to other approaches used to explain pro-environmental behaviour, reviews the empirical evidence for it and comes up with suggestions for future research.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study compares the theory with other popular theories to explain pro-environmental behaviour and behaviour change and systematically review 25 empirical research studies that adopt the goal-framing theory.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nMost studies rely on survey data, focus on Europe and gather self-reported behaviours or hypothetical responses. Furthermore, many studies of goal frames neglect key situational factors. Thus, the directions for further research outlined herein emphasise the need for more experimental studies of real behaviours, with consideration of situational factors, using methods that can explicate unconscious processes too. Overall, goal-framing theory provides a promising approach for analysing pro-environmental behaviours, in that it explicitly deals with goal conflicts, takes situational factors into account and encompasses conscious and unconscious processes. The authors conclude that the theory can form a useful basis for the design of social marketing behavioural interventions to promote pro-environmental behaviours.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, as the first systematic review of empirical applications of goal-framing theory, this study provides refinement and validation. By also offering propositions and a research agenda, the authors hope to inspire researchers in social marketing to address the remaining gaps and refine the theory even further.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Marketing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-03-2021-0058\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-03-2021-0058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的保护环境是地球长期可持续性的基础,但促进环保行为的努力往往没有考虑到这些行为的动机决定因素。本研究旨在提出并批判性地评估目标框架理论的理论和经验基础,该理论认为,有利于环境的行为可能源于相互冲突的目标。本研究将该理论与其他用于解释环保行为的方法进行了比较,回顾了其实证证据,并为未来的研究提出了建议。设计/方法论/方法本研究将该理论与其他流行理论进行比较,以解释环保行为和行为变化,并系统回顾了25项采用目标框架理论的实证研究。发现大多数研究依赖于调查数据,关注欧洲,并收集自我报告的行为或假设反应。此外,许多关于目标框架的研究忽视了关键的情境因素。因此,本文概述的进一步研究方向强调了对真实行为进行更多实验研究的必要性,同时考虑情境因素,使用可以解释无意识过程的方法。总的来说,目标框架理论为分析有利于环境的行为提供了一种很有前途的方法,因为它明确处理目标冲突,考虑到情境因素,并包括有意识和无意识的过程。作者得出结论,该理论可以为设计社会营销行为干预措施以促进环保行为提供有用的基础。原创性/价值据作者所知,作为对目标框架理论实证应用的首次系统综述,本研究提供了完善和验证。通过提供命题和研究议程,作者希望激励社会营销研究人员解决剩余的差距,并进一步完善理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Goal-framing theory in environmental behaviours: review, future research agenda and possible applications in behavioural change
Purpose Preserving the environment is fundamental to the planet’s long-term sustainability, but attempts to promote pro-environmental behaviours often do not take into account the motivational determinants of such behaviours. This study aims to present and critically evaluate the theoretical and empirical basis of goal-framing theory, which asserts that pro-environmental behaviours might stem from conflicting goals. This study compares the theory to other approaches used to explain pro-environmental behaviour, reviews the empirical evidence for it and comes up with suggestions for future research. Design/methodology/approach This study compares the theory with other popular theories to explain pro-environmental behaviour and behaviour change and systematically review 25 empirical research studies that adopt the goal-framing theory. Findings Most studies rely on survey data, focus on Europe and gather self-reported behaviours or hypothetical responses. Furthermore, many studies of goal frames neglect key situational factors. Thus, the directions for further research outlined herein emphasise the need for more experimental studies of real behaviours, with consideration of situational factors, using methods that can explicate unconscious processes too. Overall, goal-framing theory provides a promising approach for analysing pro-environmental behaviours, in that it explicitly deals with goal conflicts, takes situational factors into account and encompasses conscious and unconscious processes. The authors conclude that the theory can form a useful basis for the design of social marketing behavioural interventions to promote pro-environmental behaviours. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, as the first systematic review of empirical applications of goal-framing theory, this study provides refinement and validation. By also offering propositions and a research agenda, the authors hope to inspire researchers in social marketing to address the remaining gaps and refine the theory even further.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
29.20%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Reducing food waste through persuasive communication design: how data visualisation principles reinforce behaviour change social marketing messages Recognising motivation in others: the effectiveness of using social proof to change driving behaviour Developing a local behaviour change intervention for increased biowaste sorting: a social marketing formative study An inclusive extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior for explaining household food leftover reduction intention among Gen Z The relationship between feminist collective action and social media engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1