复古的女权主义:20世纪70年代的女权主义,文学乌托邦和莎拉·霍尔的《卡胡兰军队》

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI:10.1177/1464700121994076
J. Davidson
{"title":"复古的女权主义:20世纪70年代的女权主义,文学乌托邦和莎拉·霍尔的《卡胡兰军队》","authors":"J. Davidson","doi":"10.1177/1464700121994076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been increasing discontent with feminism’s understanding of its own history and, more specifically, the place of the feminist 1970s. Feminist scholars – most prominently, Elizabeth Freeman, Victoria Hesford, Kate Eichhorn and Kathi Weeks – have sought to move beyond the feelings of progress and nostalgia that the feminist 1970s often inspires. There is a need to mediate between the urge to leave the past behind and the desire to return to it, with feminists adopting positions that ricochet between progress and nostalgia. In this article, I argue that the feminist literary utopia offers a particularly productive means by which to represent this ambivalent, paradoxical temporal understanding. The classic feminist utopias of the 1970s have become the object of critical contention in more recent speculative texts, which destabilise both progress and nostalgia in their evocation of second-wave separatism. To elaborate this claim, I turn to Sarah Hall’s The Carhullan Army, which critically assesses the feminist 1970s via an account of a separatist feminist enclave in a near-future Britain. The community of women is a homage to the feminist 1970s, displaying both the potentialities of the movements of this time as well as their sometimes violent limitations. The dreams of the 1970s emerge in the text as an unsettling presence in the world, a force that can neither be left behind nor fully embraced.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"24 1","pages":"243 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1464700121994076","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrotopian feminism: the feminist 1970s, the literary utopia and Sarah Hall’s The Carhullan Army\",\"authors\":\"J. Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1464700121994076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, there has been increasing discontent with feminism’s understanding of its own history and, more specifically, the place of the feminist 1970s. Feminist scholars – most prominently, Elizabeth Freeman, Victoria Hesford, Kate Eichhorn and Kathi Weeks – have sought to move beyond the feelings of progress and nostalgia that the feminist 1970s often inspires. There is a need to mediate between the urge to leave the past behind and the desire to return to it, with feminists adopting positions that ricochet between progress and nostalgia. In this article, I argue that the feminist literary utopia offers a particularly productive means by which to represent this ambivalent, paradoxical temporal understanding. The classic feminist utopias of the 1970s have become the object of critical contention in more recent speculative texts, which destabilise both progress and nostalgia in their evocation of second-wave separatism. To elaborate this claim, I turn to Sarah Hall’s The Carhullan Army, which critically assesses the feminist 1970s via an account of a separatist feminist enclave in a near-future Britain. The community of women is a homage to the feminist 1970s, displaying both the potentialities of the movements of this time as well as their sometimes violent limitations. The dreams of the 1970s emerge in the text as an unsettling presence in the world, a force that can neither be left behind nor fully embraced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Theory\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1464700121994076\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700121994076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700121994076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,人们越来越不满女权主义对自身历史的理解,更具体地说,是对20世纪70年代女权主义的理解。女权主义学者——最突出的是伊丽莎白·弗里曼、维多利亚·赫斯福德、凯特·艾希霍恩和凯茜·威克斯——试图超越20世纪70年代女权主义经常激发的进步感和怀旧感。有必要在抛弃过去的冲动和回归过去的愿望之间进行调解,女权主义者的立场在进步和怀旧之间摇摆不定。在这篇文章中,我认为女权主义文学乌托邦提供了一种特别富有成效的手段来表现这种矛盾的、自相矛盾的时间理解。20世纪70年代的经典女权主义乌托邦在最近的推测性文本中成为了批判性争论的对象,这些文本在唤起第二波分离主义时破坏了进步和怀旧的稳定。为了详细阐述这一说法,我参考了莎拉·霍尔的《卡胡兰军队》,该书通过对不久的将来英国分离主义女权主义飞地的描述,批判性地评估了20世纪70年代的女权主义。妇女社区是对20世纪70年代女权主义的致敬,既展示了这一时期运动的潜力,也展示了她们有时的暴力局限性。20世纪70年代的梦想在文本中以一种令人不安的存在出现在世界上,一种既不能被抛在后面也不能被完全拥抱的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retrotopian feminism: the feminist 1970s, the literary utopia and Sarah Hall’s The Carhullan Army
In recent years, there has been increasing discontent with feminism’s understanding of its own history and, more specifically, the place of the feminist 1970s. Feminist scholars – most prominently, Elizabeth Freeman, Victoria Hesford, Kate Eichhorn and Kathi Weeks – have sought to move beyond the feelings of progress and nostalgia that the feminist 1970s often inspires. There is a need to mediate between the urge to leave the past behind and the desire to return to it, with feminists adopting positions that ricochet between progress and nostalgia. In this article, I argue that the feminist literary utopia offers a particularly productive means by which to represent this ambivalent, paradoxical temporal understanding. The classic feminist utopias of the 1970s have become the object of critical contention in more recent speculative texts, which destabilise both progress and nostalgia in their evocation of second-wave separatism. To elaborate this claim, I turn to Sarah Hall’s The Carhullan Army, which critically assesses the feminist 1970s via an account of a separatist feminist enclave in a near-future Britain. The community of women is a homage to the feminist 1970s, displaying both the potentialities of the movements of this time as well as their sometimes violent limitations. The dreams of the 1970s emerge in the text as an unsettling presence in the world, a force that can neither be left behind nor fully embraced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Theory
Feminist Theory WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Feminist Theory is an international interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for critical analysis and constructive debate within feminism. Theoretical Pluralism / Feminist Diversity Feminist Theory is genuinely interdisciplinary and reflects the diversity of feminism, incorporating perspectives from across the broad spectrum of the humanities and social sciences and the full range of feminist political and theoretical stances.
期刊最新文献
Drafting injustice: overturning Roe v. Wade, spillover effects and reproductive rights in context. Countertopographies of copper: Martha Rosler, Chris Kraus and the Great Arizona Copper Strike of 1983–1986 Social Reproduction Feminism and World-Culture: Introduction Between familism and neoliberalism: the case of Jewish Israeli grandmothers Domestic service and Chilean literature: fictional experiments in narrating the household
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1