加纳权力下放的治理体系:酋长的作用

IF 0.8 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION International Journal of Public Leadership Pub Date : 2019-02-11 DOI:10.1108/IJPL-01-2018-0005
Ben Q. Honyenuga, Edem Happy Wutoh
{"title":"加纳权力下放的治理体系:酋长的作用","authors":"Ben Q. Honyenuga, Edem Happy Wutoh","doi":"10.1108/IJPL-01-2018-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which Chiefs are involved in Ghana’s decentralization process and assess the benefits and challenges associated with the formal inclusion of Chiefs in local governance in Ghana.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study applied a qualitative inductive approach and employed interviews and focus group discussions to gather data from selected traditional areas within the Volta Region of Ghana.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings reveal conflicting roles being performed by Chiefs and local government actors leading to role conflicts.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThough the study is limited with respect to its scope, it opens up the debate regarding the position of Chiefs in Ghana’s decentralized local governance system and also serves as a useful point of reference for future research in the decentralization process and the Chieftaincy institution.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe paper provides an opportunity for stakeholders in Ghana’s decentralized local governance system to review the current decentralization policy to take care of the concerns of the traditional authorities at the grassroots. The recommendations, among others, call for a great deal of consensus building between the Chiefs and local government actors to enhance the success of the decentralization process.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper provides evidence regarding the loopholes in the structure of Ghana’s decentralized local governance system which appear to exclude the traditional authorities thereby affecting the smooth running of that system.\n","PeriodicalId":43080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Leadership","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJPL-01-2018-0005","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ghana’s decentralized governance system: the role of Chiefs\",\"authors\":\"Ben Q. Honyenuga, Edem Happy Wutoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/IJPL-01-2018-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which Chiefs are involved in Ghana’s decentralization process and assess the benefits and challenges associated with the formal inclusion of Chiefs in local governance in Ghana.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe study applied a qualitative inductive approach and employed interviews and focus group discussions to gather data from selected traditional areas within the Volta Region of Ghana.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings reveal conflicting roles being performed by Chiefs and local government actors leading to role conflicts.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThough the study is limited with respect to its scope, it opens up the debate regarding the position of Chiefs in Ghana’s decentralized local governance system and also serves as a useful point of reference for future research in the decentralization process and the Chieftaincy institution.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe paper provides an opportunity for stakeholders in Ghana’s decentralized local governance system to review the current decentralization policy to take care of the concerns of the traditional authorities at the grassroots. The recommendations, among others, call for a great deal of consensus building between the Chiefs and local government actors to enhance the success of the decentralization process.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe paper provides evidence regarding the loopholes in the structure of Ghana’s decentralized local governance system which appear to exclude the traditional authorities thereby affecting the smooth running of that system.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Leadership\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJPL-01-2018-0005\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-01-2018-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-01-2018-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的本文的目的是探讨酋长们在多大程度上参与加纳的权力下放进程,并评估酋长们正式参与加纳地方治理的好处和挑战。设计/方法/方法该研究采用了定性归纳方法,并采用访谈和焦点小组讨论从选定的地方收集数据加纳沃尔特地区的传统地区。调查结果揭示了酋长和地方政府行为者扮演的相互冲突的角色,导致了角色冲突。研究局限性/含义尽管该研究的范围有限,但它开启了关于酋长在加纳权力下放的地方治理系统中的地位的辩论,也为未来权力下放进程和酋长机构的研究提供了有用的参考点。实际意义该文件为加纳权力下放的地方治理系统的利益攸关方提供了一个机会,让他们审查当前的权力下放政策,以照顾基层传统当局的关切。除其他外,这些建议呼吁酋长和地方政府行为者之间建立大量共识,以提高权力下放进程的成功率。独创性/价值本文提供了关于加纳分散的地方治理体系结构中的漏洞的证据,这些漏洞似乎排除了传统当局,从而影响了该体系的顺利运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ghana’s decentralized governance system: the role of Chiefs
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which Chiefs are involved in Ghana’s decentralization process and assess the benefits and challenges associated with the formal inclusion of Chiefs in local governance in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach The study applied a qualitative inductive approach and employed interviews and focus group discussions to gather data from selected traditional areas within the Volta Region of Ghana. Findings The findings reveal conflicting roles being performed by Chiefs and local government actors leading to role conflicts. Research limitations/implications Though the study is limited with respect to its scope, it opens up the debate regarding the position of Chiefs in Ghana’s decentralized local governance system and also serves as a useful point of reference for future research in the decentralization process and the Chieftaincy institution. Practical implications The paper provides an opportunity for stakeholders in Ghana’s decentralized local governance system to review the current decentralization policy to take care of the concerns of the traditional authorities at the grassroots. The recommendations, among others, call for a great deal of consensus building between the Chiefs and local government actors to enhance the success of the decentralization process. Originality/value The paper provides evidence regarding the loopholes in the structure of Ghana’s decentralized local governance system which appear to exclude the traditional authorities thereby affecting the smooth running of that system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Feasibility in embedding charismatic leadership strategies into social work applications Empowering leadership and employee well-being: the role of psychological empowerment and time pressure Interrogating the practice of integrity in Tanzania public service Enabling social change: a case study of complex adaptive leadership within an informal settlement in Iran Major criteria of credible integrated development planning in local government: city of Mbombela, Ehlanzeni District, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1