{"title":"欧洲众筹服务提供商监管:欧洲市场借贷和投资的未来以及“众筹性质”困境","authors":"E. Macchiavello","doi":"10.54648/eulr2021020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Regulation on European Crowdfunding Service Providers (ECSPs) for businesses, since its Proposal by the European Commission in March 2018, has experienced difficult trilateral negotiations. The length of the legislative process relates not only to nationalism resurgence, uncertain Brexit negotiations and COVID-19 outbreak but also to different views about crowdfunding and its optimal regulation within the three European Institutions. The present paper, after describing crowdfunding’s main features, will critically analyze the ECSPs Regulation in details as eventually adopted in October 2020, also in comparison with the alternative options available and their relative implications, in order to discuss the resulting picture of crowdfunding and its future under the new European regime, also providing suggestions for certain adjustments.\nBank resolution, insolvency, significant non-financial enterprises, enterprise groups, Carillion, early intervention, recovery and resolution planning, living wills, public interest, systemic risk, critical functions.","PeriodicalId":53431,"journal":{"name":"European Business Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation: The Future of Marketplace Lending and Investing in Europe and the ‘Crowdfunding Nature’ Dilemma\",\"authors\":\"E. Macchiavello\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eulr2021020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Regulation on European Crowdfunding Service Providers (ECSPs) for businesses, since its Proposal by the European Commission in March 2018, has experienced difficult trilateral negotiations. The length of the legislative process relates not only to nationalism resurgence, uncertain Brexit negotiations and COVID-19 outbreak but also to different views about crowdfunding and its optimal regulation within the three European Institutions. The present paper, after describing crowdfunding’s main features, will critically analyze the ECSPs Regulation in details as eventually adopted in October 2020, also in comparison with the alternative options available and their relative implications, in order to discuss the resulting picture of crowdfunding and its future under the new European regime, also providing suggestions for certain adjustments.\\nBank resolution, insolvency, significant non-financial enterprises, enterprise groups, Carillion, early intervention, recovery and resolution planning, living wills, public interest, systemic risk, critical functions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2021020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2021020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation: The Future of Marketplace Lending and Investing in Europe and the ‘Crowdfunding Nature’ Dilemma
The Regulation on European Crowdfunding Service Providers (ECSPs) for businesses, since its Proposal by the European Commission in March 2018, has experienced difficult trilateral negotiations. The length of the legislative process relates not only to nationalism resurgence, uncertain Brexit negotiations and COVID-19 outbreak but also to different views about crowdfunding and its optimal regulation within the three European Institutions. The present paper, after describing crowdfunding’s main features, will critically analyze the ECSPs Regulation in details as eventually adopted in October 2020, also in comparison with the alternative options available and their relative implications, in order to discuss the resulting picture of crowdfunding and its future under the new European regime, also providing suggestions for certain adjustments.
Bank resolution, insolvency, significant non-financial enterprises, enterprise groups, Carillion, early intervention, recovery and resolution planning, living wills, public interest, systemic risk, critical functions.
期刊介绍：
The mission of the European Business Law Review is to provide a forum for analysis and discussion of business law, including European Union law and the laws of the Member States and other European countries, as well as legal frameworks and issues in international and comparative contexts. The Review moves freely over the boundaries that divide the law, and covers business law, broadly defined, in public or private law, domestic, European or international law. Our topics of interest include commercial, financial, corporate, private and regulatory laws with a broadly business dimension. The Review offers current, authoritative scholarship on a wide range of issues and developments, featuring contributors providing an international as well as a European perspective. The Review is an invaluable source of current scholarship, information, practical analysis, and expert guidance for all practising lawyers, advisers, and scholars dealing with European business law on a regular basis. The Review has over 25 years established the highest scholarly standards. It distinguishes itself as open-minded, embracing interests that appeal to the scholarly, practitioner and policy-making spheres. It practices strict routines of peer review. The Review imposes no word limit on submissions, subject to the appropriateness of the word length to the subject under discussion.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
