生动性、信息性和美学设计对点击付费广告吸引力的影响

IF 9.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI:10.1108/jrim-07-2022-0207
Ying Zhu, Y. Wang, Joicey J. Wei, A. Hao
{"title":"生动性、信息性和美学设计对点击付费广告吸引力的影响","authors":"Ying Zhu, Y. Wang, Joicey J. Wei, A. Hao","doi":"10.1108/jrim-07-2022-0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeFew studies illustrate how contextual effects (e.g. assimilation and contrast) in pay-per-click ad design may impact consumers' attitudes and purchase intention. To fill this research gap, the authors provide theoretical predictions and empirical evidence on how ad design may prompt an assimilation and/or a contrast effect that may influence consumers' attitudes toward the ad and the brand and purchase intention. They also investigate whether the impact of contextual effects on consumers' decisions depends on the level of vividness in the ad.Design/methodology/approachA 2 (vividness: dynamic motion vs. static page) × 2 (information design: assimilation vs. contrast) × 2 (aesthetic design: assimilation vs. contrast) between-subjects experimental design is used to examine the effects of vividness, information design and aesthetic design. Conditional process analysis is used to assess the mediating role of attitudes toward the ad and the brand in the relationship between contextual effects and purchase intention.FindingsFor dynamic ads (i.e. high vividness) but not for static ads (i.e. low vividness), combined information contrast and aesthetic contrast designs generate a more favorable attitude toward the brand and a higher purchase intention than do combined information assimilation and aesthetic assimilation designs. Notably, combined information contrast and aesthetic contrast designs have the strongest effects than any other combination of assimilation and contrast designs of information and aesthetics. Attitudes toward the ad and the brand are significant mediators between contextual factors and intention to purchase.Research limitations/implicationsThe study examines the effectiveness of online ads from a new theoretical angle based on the attributes of pay-per-click ads.Practical implicationsThe results suggest that when advertisers decide to use dynamic ads, they should adopt a contrast design for both the ad information and its aesthetics.Originality/valueThis study fills a research gap in the contextual effects literature, including providing evidence of an underlying process in the relationship between certain contextual effects and purchase intent. It also extends previous findings of assimilation/contrast in information design to aesthetics design and advances the literature on vividness by examining a moderation effect of vividness.","PeriodicalId":47116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of vividness, information and aesthetic design on the appeal of pay-per-click ads\",\"authors\":\"Ying Zhu, Y. Wang, Joicey J. Wei, A. Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jrim-07-2022-0207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeFew studies illustrate how contextual effects (e.g. assimilation and contrast) in pay-per-click ad design may impact consumers' attitudes and purchase intention. To fill this research gap, the authors provide theoretical predictions and empirical evidence on how ad design may prompt an assimilation and/or a contrast effect that may influence consumers' attitudes toward the ad and the brand and purchase intention. They also investigate whether the impact of contextual effects on consumers' decisions depends on the level of vividness in the ad.Design/methodology/approachA 2 (vividness: dynamic motion vs. static page) × 2 (information design: assimilation vs. contrast) × 2 (aesthetic design: assimilation vs. contrast) between-subjects experimental design is used to examine the effects of vividness, information design and aesthetic design. Conditional process analysis is used to assess the mediating role of attitudes toward the ad and the brand in the relationship between contextual effects and purchase intention.FindingsFor dynamic ads (i.e. high vividness) but not for static ads (i.e. low vividness), combined information contrast and aesthetic contrast designs generate a more favorable attitude toward the brand and a higher purchase intention than do combined information assimilation and aesthetic assimilation designs. Notably, combined information contrast and aesthetic contrast designs have the strongest effects than any other combination of assimilation and contrast designs of information and aesthetics. Attitudes toward the ad and the brand are significant mediators between contextual factors and intention to purchase.Research limitations/implicationsThe study examines the effectiveness of online ads from a new theoretical angle based on the attributes of pay-per-click ads.Practical implicationsThe results suggest that when advertisers decide to use dynamic ads, they should adopt a contrast design for both the ad information and its aesthetics.Originality/valueThis study fills a research gap in the contextual effects literature, including providing evidence of an underlying process in the relationship between certain contextual effects and purchase intent. It also extends previous findings of assimilation/contrast in information design to aesthetics design and advances the literature on vividness by examining a moderation effect of vividness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-07-2022-0207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-07-2022-0207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:很少有研究说明点击付费广告设计中的情境效应(如同化和对比)如何影响消费者的态度和购买意愿。为了填补这一研究空白,作者提供了理论预测和经验证据,说明广告设计如何促进同化和/或对比效应,从而影响消费者对广告、品牌和购买意愿的态度。他们还调查了情境效应对消费者决策的影响是否取决于广告的生动程度。设计/方法/方法2(生动性:动态运动vs静态页面)x2(信息设计:同化vs对比)x2(美学设计:同化vs对比)受试者间实验设计用于检验生动性、信息设计和美学设计的影响。采用条件过程分析的方法,评估广告态度和品牌态度在情境效应与购买意愿关系中的中介作用。对于动态广告(生动度高),而对于静态广告(生动度低),信息同化与审美对比相结合的设计比信息同化与审美同化相结合的设计产生了更有利的品牌态度和更高的购买意愿。值得注意的是,信息对比与审美对比的组合设计比任何其他信息与美学的同化与对比的组合设计效果都要强。对广告和品牌的态度是情境因素与购买意愿之间的显著中介。研究的局限性/启示本研究基于点击付费广告的属性,从一个新的理论角度考察了在线广告的有效性。实践启示结果表明,当广告商决定使用动态广告时,他们应该对广告信息和广告美学采用对比设计。原创性/价值本研究填补了语境效应文献的研究空白,包括提供了某些语境效应与购买意图之间关系的潜在过程的证据。它还将信息设计中的同化/对比的先前发现扩展到美学设计中,并通过检查生动性的调节效应来推进生动性的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of vividness, information and aesthetic design on the appeal of pay-per-click ads
PurposeFew studies illustrate how contextual effects (e.g. assimilation and contrast) in pay-per-click ad design may impact consumers' attitudes and purchase intention. To fill this research gap, the authors provide theoretical predictions and empirical evidence on how ad design may prompt an assimilation and/or a contrast effect that may influence consumers' attitudes toward the ad and the brand and purchase intention. They also investigate whether the impact of contextual effects on consumers' decisions depends on the level of vividness in the ad.Design/methodology/approachA 2 (vividness: dynamic motion vs. static page) × 2 (information design: assimilation vs. contrast) × 2 (aesthetic design: assimilation vs. contrast) between-subjects experimental design is used to examine the effects of vividness, information design and aesthetic design. Conditional process analysis is used to assess the mediating role of attitudes toward the ad and the brand in the relationship between contextual effects and purchase intention.FindingsFor dynamic ads (i.e. high vividness) but not for static ads (i.e. low vividness), combined information contrast and aesthetic contrast designs generate a more favorable attitude toward the brand and a higher purchase intention than do combined information assimilation and aesthetic assimilation designs. Notably, combined information contrast and aesthetic contrast designs have the strongest effects than any other combination of assimilation and contrast designs of information and aesthetics. Attitudes toward the ad and the brand are significant mediators between contextual factors and intention to purchase.Research limitations/implicationsThe study examines the effectiveness of online ads from a new theoretical angle based on the attributes of pay-per-click ads.Practical implicationsThe results suggest that when advertisers decide to use dynamic ads, they should adopt a contrast design for both the ad information and its aesthetics.Originality/valueThis study fills a research gap in the contextual effects literature, including providing evidence of an underlying process in the relationship between certain contextual effects and purchase intent. It also extends previous findings of assimilation/contrast in information design to aesthetics design and advances the literature on vividness by examining a moderation effect of vividness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing is to address substantive issues in interactive, relationship, electronic, direct and multi-channel marketing and marketing management. ISSN: 2040-7122 eISSN: 2040-7122 With its origins in the discipline and practice of direct marketing, the Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing (JRIM) aims to publish progressive, innovative and rigorous scholarly research for marketing academics and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Embracing the future of interactive marketing with contactless technology: evidence from tourism businesses The feeling of being together in the metaverse: the positive influence of copresence on subjective well-being It’s the moment of truth: a longitudinal study of touchpoint influence on business-to-business relationships Unveiling product imagination and decision comfort through personalized virtual try-on: the moderating role of spatial processing perception Empowerment to commitment: how live-streaming atmosphere and relational bonds drive impulse consumption?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1