社会认同对大学生偏见性言语攻击旁观者反应的影响

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1080/10926771.2023.2204844
Shveta Kumaria, David S. Byers, K. McCarthy, Carmen Moedano
{"title":"社会认同对大学生偏见性言语攻击旁观者反应的影响","authors":"Shveta Kumaria, David S. Byers, K. McCarthy, Carmen Moedano","doi":"10.1080/10926771.2023.2204844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Bias-based bullying is a significant problem in the United States, including aggression targeting college students with minoritized social identities. Bystander responsiveness can help to buffer the effects, but social identity factors may influence how students respond to bias-based aggression among peers. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a subsample (N = 7,291) of the 2018–2019 Healthy Minds Study to test correlations between racial, sexual, and gender identities and self-reported and hypothetical peer interventions. Students who identify with minoritized sexual and gender identities, across racial identities, are most likely to report past or intended interventions while students who identify as straight, cisgender, male, and White are least likely. Specifically, students with minoritized sexual and gender identities are 32% more likely than straight and cisgender peers to report that they had intervened in the past year and 36% more likely to indicate that they intend to intervene in the future. Experiences of discrimination and belonging are significant but separate covariates. Interventions to support peer responsiveness must attend to dynamics of power, oppression, and social identity to reach more students.","PeriodicalId":47784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma","volume":"32 1","pages":"1393 - 1411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Identity as a Factor in Bystander Responses to Bias-Based Verbal Aggression Among College Students\",\"authors\":\"Shveta Kumaria, David S. Byers, K. McCarthy, Carmen Moedano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10926771.2023.2204844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Bias-based bullying is a significant problem in the United States, including aggression targeting college students with minoritized social identities. Bystander responsiveness can help to buffer the effects, but social identity factors may influence how students respond to bias-based aggression among peers. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a subsample (N = 7,291) of the 2018–2019 Healthy Minds Study to test correlations between racial, sexual, and gender identities and self-reported and hypothetical peer interventions. Students who identify with minoritized sexual and gender identities, across racial identities, are most likely to report past or intended interventions while students who identify as straight, cisgender, male, and White are least likely. Specifically, students with minoritized sexual and gender identities are 32% more likely than straight and cisgender peers to report that they had intervened in the past year and 36% more likely to indicate that they intend to intervene in the future. Experiences of discrimination and belonging are significant but separate covariates. Interventions to support peer responsiveness must attend to dynamics of power, oppression, and social identity to reach more students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"1393 - 1411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2023.2204844\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2023.2204844","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要基于偏见的欺凌在美国是一个重大问题,包括针对具有少数社会身份的大学生的攻击。旁观者的反应有助于缓冲这种影响,但社会身份因素可能会影响学生对同龄人中基于偏见的攻击的反应。我们对子样本(N = 7291),以测试种族、性和性别认同与自我报告和假设的同伴干预之间的相关性。跨种族认同少数性和性别认同的学生最有可能报告过去或打算进行的干预,而认同异性恋、顺性别、男性和白人的学生最不可能报告。具体而言,与异性恋和顺性别同龄人相比,具有少数性别和性别认同的学生报告他们在过去一年中进行过干预的可能性高32%,表示他们打算在未来进行干预的可能性低36%。歧视和归属的经历是重要但独立的协变量。支持同伴反应的干预措施必须关注权力、压迫和社会认同的动态,以接触到更多的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Identity as a Factor in Bystander Responses to Bias-Based Verbal Aggression Among College Students
ABSTRACT Bias-based bullying is a significant problem in the United States, including aggression targeting college students with minoritized social identities. Bystander responsiveness can help to buffer the effects, but social identity factors may influence how students respond to bias-based aggression among peers. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a subsample (N = 7,291) of the 2018–2019 Healthy Minds Study to test correlations between racial, sexual, and gender identities and self-reported and hypothetical peer interventions. Students who identify with minoritized sexual and gender identities, across racial identities, are most likely to report past or intended interventions while students who identify as straight, cisgender, male, and White are least likely. Specifically, students with minoritized sexual and gender identities are 32% more likely than straight and cisgender peers to report that they had intervened in the past year and 36% more likely to indicate that they intend to intervene in the future. Experiences of discrimination and belonging are significant but separate covariates. Interventions to support peer responsiveness must attend to dynamics of power, oppression, and social identity to reach more students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: In this important publication, you"ll find crucial information on vital issues surrounding aggression, maltreatment, and trauma. You"ll learn how to prevent these behaviors, how to help victims, and how to intervene in abusive situations using the latest research in these areas. The Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma accepts individual submissions in any of the relevant topic areas and also publishes thematic issues featuring guest editors who focus on a particular aspect of these topics.
期刊最新文献
Cumulative Trauma Exposure and Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms Among Older Adults in South Africa: Does Post-Traumatic Growth Moderate This Link? Psychological Abuse in Jurisprudence Associated with Cults and Manipulative Groups: A Transcultural Study on Five Convictions Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Survivor’s Report on Well-Being and Perpetrator’s Attributions The MACE-SCREEN – Screening for Abuse and Neglect Across Developmental Stages The Effects of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, Progressive Muscle Relaxation, Distraction, and Rumination on State Anger Using the Autobiographical Essay Memory Task
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1