Electrocardiographic temporo-spatial assessment of depolarization and repolarization changes after epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate ablation in Brugada syndrome.

Aims: In Brugada syndrome (BrS), with spontaneous or ajmaline-induced coved ST elevation, epicardial electro-anatomic potential duration maps (epi-PDMs) were detected on a right ventricle (RV) outflow tract (RVOT), an arrhythmogenic substrate area (AS area), abolished by epicardial-radiofrequency ablation (EPI-AS-RFA). Novel CineECG, projecting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms on a 3D heart model, previously localized depolarization forces in RV/RVOT in BrS patients. We evaluate 12-lead ECG and CineECG depolarization/repolarization changes in spontaneous type-1 BrS patients before/after EPI-AS-RFA, compared with normal controls.

Methods and results: In 30 high-risk BrS patients (93% males, age 37 + 9 years), 12-lead ECGs and epi-PDMs were obtained at baseline, early after EPI-AS-RFA, and late follow-up (FU) (2.7-16.1 months). CineECG estimates temporo-spatial localization during depolarization (Early-QRS and Terminal-QRS) and repolarization (ST-Tpeak, Tpeak-Tend). Differences within BrS patients (baseline vs. early after EPI-AS-RFA vs. late FU) were analysed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while differences between BrS patients and 60 age-sex-matched normal controls were analysed by the Mann-Whitney test. In BrS patients, baseline QRS and QTc durations were longer and normalized after EPI-AS-ATC (151 ± 15 vs. 102 ± 13 ms, P < 0.001; 454 ± 40 vs. 421 ± 27 ms, P < 0.000). Baseline QRS amplitude was lower and increased at late FU (0.63 ± 0.26 vs. 0.84 ± 13 ms, P < 0.000), while Terminal-QRS amplitude decreased (0.24 ± 0.07 vs. 0.08 ± 0.03 ms, P < 0.000). At baseline, CineECG depolarization/repolarization wavefront prevalently localized in RV/RVOT (Terminal-QRS, 57%; ST-Tpeak, 100%; and Tpeak-Tend, 61%), congruent with the AS area on epi-PDM. Early after EPI-AS-RFA, RV/RVOT localization during depolarization disappeared, as Terminal-QRS prevalently localized in the left ventricle (LV, 76%), while repolarization still localized on RV/RVOT [ST-Tpeak (44%) and Tpeak-Tend (98%)]. At late FU, depolarization/repolarization forces prevalently localized in the LV (Terminal-QRS, 94%; ST-Tpeak, 63%; Tpeak-Tend, 86%), like normal controls.

Conclusion: CineECG and 12-lead ECG showed a complex temporo-spatial perturbation of both depolarization and repolarization in BrS patients, prevalently localized in RV/RVOT, progressively normalizing after epicardial ablation.