用于政策和决策的生态系统服务制图和评估:来自欧洲案例研究比较分析的经验教训

IF 1.8 Q3 ECOLOGY One Ecosystem Pub Date : 2020-06-02 DOI:10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111
D. Geneletti, Blal Adem Esmail, Chiara Cortinovis, Ildikó Arany, M. Balzan, P. van Beukering, Sabine Bicking, P. Borges, Bilyana Borisova, S. Broekx, Benjamin Burkhard, A. Gil, O. Inghe, L. Kopperoinen, M. Kruse, I. Liekens, Damian Lowicki, A. Mizgajski, S. Mulder, S. Nedkov, H. Ostergård, Ana Picanço, Anda Ruskule, F. Santos-Martín, I. Sieber, J. Svensson, Dava Vačkářů, K. Veidemane
{"title":"用于政策和决策的生态系统服务制图和评估:来自欧洲案例研究比较分析的经验教训","authors":"D. Geneletti, Blal Adem Esmail, Chiara Cortinovis, Ildikó Arany, M. Balzan, P. van Beukering, Sabine Bicking, P. Borges, Bilyana Borisova, S. Broekx, Benjamin Burkhard, A. Gil, O. Inghe, L. Kopperoinen, M. Kruse, I. Liekens, Damian Lowicki, A. Mizgajski, S. Mulder, S. Nedkov, H. Ostergård, Ana Picanço, Anda Ruskule, F. Santos-Martín, I. Sieber, J. Svensson, Dava Vačkářů, K. Veidemane","doi":"10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses and compares a set of case studies on ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment with the purpose of formulating lessons learned and recommendations. Fourteen case studies were selected during the EU Horizon 2020 “Coordination and Support Action” ESMERALDA to represent different policy- and decision-making processes throughout the European Union, across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales. The analysis is based on a framework that addresses the key steps of an ES mapping and assessment process, namely policy questions, stakeholder identification and involvement, application of mapping and assessment methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The analysis revealed that most case studies were policy-orientated or gave explicit suggestions for policy implementation in different contexts, including urban, rural and natural areas. Amongst the findings, the importance of starting stakeholder engagement early in the process was confirmed in order to generate interest and confidence in the project and to increase their willingness to cooperate. Concerning mapping and assessment methods, it was found that the integration of methods and results is essential for providing a comprehensive overview from different perspectives (e.g. social, economic). Finally, lessons learned for effective implementation of ES mapping and assessment results are presented and discussed.\n Graphical Abstarcat in Fig. 1.","PeriodicalId":36908,"journal":{"name":"One Ecosystem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies\",\"authors\":\"D. Geneletti, Blal Adem Esmail, Chiara Cortinovis, Ildikó Arany, M. Balzan, P. van Beukering, Sabine Bicking, P. Borges, Bilyana Borisova, S. Broekx, Benjamin Burkhard, A. Gil, O. Inghe, L. Kopperoinen, M. Kruse, I. Liekens, Damian Lowicki, A. Mizgajski, S. Mulder, S. Nedkov, H. Ostergård, Ana Picanço, Anda Ruskule, F. Santos-Martín, I. Sieber, J. Svensson, Dava Vačkářů, K. Veidemane\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyses and compares a set of case studies on ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment with the purpose of formulating lessons learned and recommendations. Fourteen case studies were selected during the EU Horizon 2020 “Coordination and Support Action” ESMERALDA to represent different policy- and decision-making processes throughout the European Union, across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales. The analysis is based on a framework that addresses the key steps of an ES mapping and assessment process, namely policy questions, stakeholder identification and involvement, application of mapping and assessment methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The analysis revealed that most case studies were policy-orientated or gave explicit suggestions for policy implementation in different contexts, including urban, rural and natural areas. Amongst the findings, the importance of starting stakeholder engagement early in the process was confirmed in order to generate interest and confidence in the project and to increase their willingness to cooperate. Concerning mapping and assessment methods, it was found that the integration of methods and results is essential for providing a comprehensive overview from different perspectives (e.g. social, economic). Finally, lessons learned for effective implementation of ES mapping and assessment results are presented and discussed.\\n Graphical Abstarcat in Fig. 1.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Ecosystem\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Ecosystem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Ecosystem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

本文分析和比较了一组关于生态系统服务测绘和评估的案例研究,目的是总结经验教训并提出建议。在欧盟地平线2020“协调和支持行动”ESMERALDA期间,选择了14个案例研究,以代表整个欧盟的不同政策和决策过程,涉及广泛的主题、生物群落和规模。该分析基于一个框架,该框架涉及ES绘制和评估过程的关键步骤,即政策问题、利益相关者的识别和参与、绘制和评估方法的应用、传播、沟通和实施。分析显示,大多数案例研究都是以政策为导向的,或为不同背景下的政策执行提出明确建议,包括城市、农村和自然地区。在调查结果中,确认了在过程早期开始利益相关者参与的重要性,以产生对项目的兴趣和信心,并提高他们的合作意愿。关于绘图和评估方法,人们发现,方法和结果的结合对于从不同角度(如社会、经济)提供全面概览至关重要。最后,介绍并讨论了有效实施ES制图和评估结果的经验教训。图1中的图表摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies
This paper analyses and compares a set of case studies on ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment with the purpose of formulating lessons learned and recommendations. Fourteen case studies were selected during the EU Horizon 2020 “Coordination and Support Action” ESMERALDA to represent different policy- and decision-making processes throughout the European Union, across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales. The analysis is based on a framework that addresses the key steps of an ES mapping and assessment process, namely policy questions, stakeholder identification and involvement, application of mapping and assessment methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The analysis revealed that most case studies were policy-orientated or gave explicit suggestions for policy implementation in different contexts, including urban, rural and natural areas. Amongst the findings, the importance of starting stakeholder engagement early in the process was confirmed in order to generate interest and confidence in the project and to increase their willingness to cooperate. Concerning mapping and assessment methods, it was found that the integration of methods and results is essential for providing a comprehensive overview from different perspectives (e.g. social, economic). Finally, lessons learned for effective implementation of ES mapping and assessment results are presented and discussed. Graphical Abstarcat in Fig. 1.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
One Ecosystem
One Ecosystem Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
CH4 and N2O emissions and their potential control by rice biomass biochar: The case of continuously flooded paddy fields in Indonesia - A review The influence of naturalness of the landscape structure on children’s connectedness to Nature in north-eastern Italy Historical reconstruction of the invasions of four non-native tree species at local scale: a detective work on Ailanthus altissima, Celtis occidentalis, Prunus serotina and Acer negundo As green infrastructure, linear semi-natural habitats boost regulating ecosystem services supply in agriculturally-dominated landscapes Practical framework for cultural ecosystem service in urban landscape design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1