Florian Moik , Cornelia Englisch , Ingrid Pabinger , Cihan Ay
{"title":"癌症相关血栓形成的风险评估模型-潜力和前景","authors":"Florian Moik , Cornelia Englisch , Ingrid Pabinger , Cihan Ay","doi":"10.1016/j.tru.2021.100075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Risk assessment models can help identifying high-risk populations that might benefit from primary thromboprophylaxis. Currently, the Khorana score is suggested to select patients for primary thromboprophylaxis. However, risk stratification with the Khorana-score remains imperfect, which led to the development of subsequent clinical risk assessment models (PROTECHT-, CONKO-, ONKOTEV-, TiCat-, COMPASS-CAT-score). Further, recently, a simplified, personalized risk prediction tool for cancer-associated VTE, incorporating cancer type and D-Dimer levels has been proposed by Pabinger et al. (CATSCORE). Also, novel models have been designed specifically for specific tumour types, such as lung cancer (ROADMAP-CAT), gynaecological cancer (THROMBOGYN), lymphoma (THROLY), or multiple myeloma (SAVED-; IMPEDE VTE-score). In the present narrative review, we comprehensively summarize available data on currently available risk assessment models for VTE in patients with cancer, provide a critical discussion on their clinical utility, and give an outlook towards future developments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34401,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572721000444/pdfft?md5=b229a1db421d83584ec610be802fdb22&pid=1-s2.0-S2666572721000444-main.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessment models of cancer-associated thrombosis - Potentials and perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Florian Moik , Cornelia Englisch , Ingrid Pabinger , Cihan Ay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tru.2021.100075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Risk assessment models can help identifying high-risk populations that might benefit from primary thromboprophylaxis. Currently, the Khorana score is suggested to select patients for primary thromboprophylaxis. However, risk stratification with the Khorana-score remains imperfect, which led to the development of subsequent clinical risk assessment models (PROTECHT-, CONKO-, ONKOTEV-, TiCat-, COMPASS-CAT-score). Further, recently, a simplified, personalized risk prediction tool for cancer-associated VTE, incorporating cancer type and D-Dimer levels has been proposed by Pabinger et al. (CATSCORE). Also, novel models have been designed specifically for specific tumour types, such as lung cancer (ROADMAP-CAT), gynaecological cancer (THROMBOGYN), lymphoma (THROLY), or multiple myeloma (SAVED-; IMPEDE VTE-score). In the present narrative review, we comprehensively summarize available data on currently available risk assessment models for VTE in patients with cancer, provide a critical discussion on their clinical utility, and give an outlook towards future developments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572721000444/pdfft?md5=b229a1db421d83584ec610be802fdb22&pid=1-s2.0-S2666572721000444-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572721000444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572721000444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk assessment models of cancer-associated thrombosis - Potentials and perspectives
Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Risk assessment models can help identifying high-risk populations that might benefit from primary thromboprophylaxis. Currently, the Khorana score is suggested to select patients for primary thromboprophylaxis. However, risk stratification with the Khorana-score remains imperfect, which led to the development of subsequent clinical risk assessment models (PROTECHT-, CONKO-, ONKOTEV-, TiCat-, COMPASS-CAT-score). Further, recently, a simplified, personalized risk prediction tool for cancer-associated VTE, incorporating cancer type and D-Dimer levels has been proposed by Pabinger et al. (CATSCORE). Also, novel models have been designed specifically for specific tumour types, such as lung cancer (ROADMAP-CAT), gynaecological cancer (THROMBOGYN), lymphoma (THROLY), or multiple myeloma (SAVED-; IMPEDE VTE-score). In the present narrative review, we comprehensively summarize available data on currently available risk assessment models for VTE in patients with cancer, provide a critical discussion on their clinical utility, and give an outlook towards future developments.