癌症相关血栓形成的风险评估模型-潜力和前景

Q4 Medicine Thrombosis Update Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tru.2021.100075
Florian Moik , Cornelia Englisch , Ingrid Pabinger , Cihan Ay
{"title":"癌症相关血栓形成的风险评估模型-潜力和前景","authors":"Florian Moik ,&nbsp;Cornelia Englisch ,&nbsp;Ingrid Pabinger ,&nbsp;Cihan Ay","doi":"10.1016/j.tru.2021.100075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Risk assessment models can help identifying high-risk populations that might benefit from primary thromboprophylaxis. Currently, the Khorana score is suggested to select patients for primary thromboprophylaxis. However, risk stratification with the Khorana-score remains imperfect, which led to the development of subsequent clinical risk assessment models (PROTECHT-, CONKO-, ONKOTEV-, TiCat-, COMPASS-CAT-score). Further, recently, a simplified, personalized risk prediction tool for cancer-associated VTE, incorporating cancer type and D-Dimer levels has been proposed by Pabinger et al. (CATSCORE). Also, novel models have been designed specifically for specific tumour types, such as lung cancer (ROADMAP-CAT), gynaecological cancer (THROMBOGYN), lymphoma (THROLY), or multiple myeloma (SAVED-; IMPEDE VTE-score). In the present narrative review, we comprehensively summarize available data on currently available risk assessment models for VTE in patients with cancer, provide a critical discussion on their clinical utility, and give an outlook towards future developments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34401,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572721000444/pdfft?md5=b229a1db421d83584ec610be802fdb22&pid=1-s2.0-S2666572721000444-main.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessment models of cancer-associated thrombosis - Potentials and perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Florian Moik ,&nbsp;Cornelia Englisch ,&nbsp;Ingrid Pabinger ,&nbsp;Cihan Ay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tru.2021.100075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Risk assessment models can help identifying high-risk populations that might benefit from primary thromboprophylaxis. Currently, the Khorana score is suggested to select patients for primary thromboprophylaxis. However, risk stratification with the Khorana-score remains imperfect, which led to the development of subsequent clinical risk assessment models (PROTECHT-, CONKO-, ONKOTEV-, TiCat-, COMPASS-CAT-score). Further, recently, a simplified, personalized risk prediction tool for cancer-associated VTE, incorporating cancer type and D-Dimer levels has been proposed by Pabinger et al. (CATSCORE). Also, novel models have been designed specifically for specific tumour types, such as lung cancer (ROADMAP-CAT), gynaecological cancer (THROMBOGYN), lymphoma (THROLY), or multiple myeloma (SAVED-; IMPEDE VTE-score). In the present narrative review, we comprehensively summarize available data on currently available risk assessment models for VTE in patients with cancer, provide a critical discussion on their clinical utility, and give an outlook towards future developments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572721000444/pdfft?md5=b229a1db421d83584ec610be802fdb22&pid=1-s2.0-S2666572721000444-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572721000444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572721000444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

癌症患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加。风险评估模型可以帮助确定可能受益于初级血栓预防的高危人群。目前,建议使用Khorana评分来选择初级血栓预防患者。然而,khorana评分的风险分层仍然不完善,这导致了后续临床风险评估模型(PROTECHT-、CONKO-、ONKOTEV-、TiCat-、compass - cat -评分)的发展。此外,最近,Pabinger等人(CATSCORE)提出了一种简化的、个性化的癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞风险预测工具,包括癌症类型和d -二聚体水平。此外,针对特定肿瘤类型,如肺癌(ROADMAP-CAT)、妇科癌(THROMBOGYN)、淋巴瘤(THROLY)或多发性骨髓瘤(SAVED-;阻碍VTE-score)。在本文中,我们全面总结了目前癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型的可用数据,对其临床应用进行了关键讨论,并对未来的发展进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk assessment models of cancer-associated thrombosis - Potentials and perspectives

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Risk assessment models can help identifying high-risk populations that might benefit from primary thromboprophylaxis. Currently, the Khorana score is suggested to select patients for primary thromboprophylaxis. However, risk stratification with the Khorana-score remains imperfect, which led to the development of subsequent clinical risk assessment models (PROTECHT-, CONKO-, ONKOTEV-, TiCat-, COMPASS-CAT-score). Further, recently, a simplified, personalized risk prediction tool for cancer-associated VTE, incorporating cancer type and D-Dimer levels has been proposed by Pabinger et al. (CATSCORE). Also, novel models have been designed specifically for specific tumour types, such as lung cancer (ROADMAP-CAT), gynaecological cancer (THROMBOGYN), lymphoma (THROLY), or multiple myeloma (SAVED-; IMPEDE VTE-score). In the present narrative review, we comprehensively summarize available data on currently available risk assessment models for VTE in patients with cancer, provide a critical discussion on their clinical utility, and give an outlook towards future developments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis Update
Thrombosis Update Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
86 days
期刊最新文献
Tissue factor (F3) gene variants and thrombotic risk among middle-aged and older adults: A population-based cohort study Catheter – related thrombosis in cancer patients: Data from the registry of thrombosis and nEoplasia of SEOM (TESEO) Usability study of the qLabs® FIB: A new point-of-care system for functional fibrinogen testing Nitrous oxide and VTE – no laughing matter Practical model for implementation of cancer-associated thrombosis prevention in the outpatient setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1