支持化妆品相关材料安全性评估的硅内毒理学方法综述

IF 3.1 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Computational Toxicology Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100213
Mark T.D. Cronin , Steven J. Enoch , Judith C. Madden , James F. Rathman , Andrea-Nicole Richarz , Chihae Yang
{"title":"支持化妆品相关材料安全性评估的硅内毒理学方法综述","authors":"Mark T.D. Cronin ,&nbsp;Steven J. Enoch ,&nbsp;Judith C. Madden ,&nbsp;James F. Rathman ,&nbsp;Andrea-Nicole Richarz ,&nbsp;Chihae Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>In silico</em> tools and resources are now used commonly in toxicology and to support the “Next Generation Risk Assessment” (NGRA) of cosmetics ingredients or materials. This review provides an overview of the approaches that are applied to assess the exposure and hazard of a cosmetic ingredient. For both hazard and exposure, databases of existing information are used routinely. In addition, for exposure, <em>in silico</em> approaches include the use of rules of thumb for systemic bioavailability as well as physiologically-based kinetics (PBK) and multi-scale models for estimating internal exposure at the organ or tissue level. (Internal) Thresholds of Toxicological Concern are applicable for the safety assessment of ingredients at low concentrations. The use of structural rules, (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships ((Q)SARs) and read-across are the most typically applied modelling approaches to predict hazard. Data from exposure and hazard assessment are increasingly being brought together in NGRA to provide an overall assessment of the safety of a cosmetic ingredient. All <em>in silico</em> approaches are reviewed in terms of their maturity and robustness for use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000019/pdfft?md5=4400391120a66de64203858cd49f172c&pid=1-s2.0-S2468111322000019-main.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of in silico toxicology approaches to support the safety assessment of cosmetics-related materials\",\"authors\":\"Mark T.D. Cronin ,&nbsp;Steven J. Enoch ,&nbsp;Judith C. Madden ,&nbsp;James F. Rathman ,&nbsp;Andrea-Nicole Richarz ,&nbsp;Chihae Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>In silico</em> tools and resources are now used commonly in toxicology and to support the “Next Generation Risk Assessment” (NGRA) of cosmetics ingredients or materials. This review provides an overview of the approaches that are applied to assess the exposure and hazard of a cosmetic ingredient. For both hazard and exposure, databases of existing information are used routinely. In addition, for exposure, <em>in silico</em> approaches include the use of rules of thumb for systemic bioavailability as well as physiologically-based kinetics (PBK) and multi-scale models for estimating internal exposure at the organ or tissue level. (Internal) Thresholds of Toxicological Concern are applicable for the safety assessment of ingredients at low concentrations. The use of structural rules, (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships ((Q)SARs) and read-across are the most typically applied modelling approaches to predict hazard. Data from exposure and hazard assessment are increasingly being brought together in NGRA to provide an overall assessment of the safety of a cosmetic ingredient. All <em>in silico</em> approaches are reviewed in terms of their maturity and robustness for use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000019/pdfft?md5=4400391120a66de64203858cd49f172c&pid=1-s2.0-S2468111322000019-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

计算机工具和资源现在普遍用于毒理学和支持化妆品成分或材料的“下一代风险评估”(NGRA)。本综述概述了用于评估化妆品成分暴露和危害的方法。对于危害和暴露,常规使用现有信息的数据库。此外,对于暴露,计算机方法包括使用系统生物利用度的经验法则以及基于生理的动力学(PBK)和用于估计器官或组织水平的内部暴露的多尺度模型。(内部)毒理学关注阈值适用于低浓度成分的安全性评估。使用结构规则、(定量)结构-活性关系(Q - sar)和跨读是预测危险最典型的建模方法。NGRA越来越多地将暴露数据和危害评估数据结合起来,对化妆品成分的安全性进行全面评估。所有的计算机方法都在其成熟度和健壮性方面进行了审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A review of in silico toxicology approaches to support the safety assessment of cosmetics-related materials

In silico tools and resources are now used commonly in toxicology and to support the “Next Generation Risk Assessment” (NGRA) of cosmetics ingredients or materials. This review provides an overview of the approaches that are applied to assess the exposure and hazard of a cosmetic ingredient. For both hazard and exposure, databases of existing information are used routinely. In addition, for exposure, in silico approaches include the use of rules of thumb for systemic bioavailability as well as physiologically-based kinetics (PBK) and multi-scale models for estimating internal exposure at the organ or tissue level. (Internal) Thresholds of Toxicological Concern are applicable for the safety assessment of ingredients at low concentrations. The use of structural rules, (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships ((Q)SARs) and read-across are the most typically applied modelling approaches to predict hazard. Data from exposure and hazard assessment are increasingly being brought together in NGRA to provide an overall assessment of the safety of a cosmetic ingredient. All in silico approaches are reviewed in terms of their maturity and robustness for use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Toxicology
Computational Toxicology Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Computational Toxicology is an international journal publishing computational approaches that assist in the toxicological evaluation of new and existing chemical substances assisting in their safety assessment. -All effects relating to human health and environmental toxicity and fate -Prediction of toxicity, metabolism, fate and physico-chemical properties -The development of models from read-across, (Q)SARs, PBPK, QIVIVE, Multi-Scale Models -Big Data in toxicology: integration, management, analysis -Implementation of models through AOPs, IATA, TTC -Regulatory acceptance of models: evaluation, verification and validation -From metals, to small organic molecules to nanoparticles -Pharmaceuticals, pesticides, foods, cosmetics, fine chemicals -Bringing together the views of industry, regulators, academia, NGOs
期刊最新文献
Predicting uptake and elimination kinetics of chemicals in invertebrates: A technical note on residual variance modeling A bioinformatics framework for human health risk assessment of externally applied dsRNA-based biopesticides The predictivity of QSARs for toxicity: Recommendations for improving model performance Reconstruction of exposure to volatile organic compounds from venous blood concentration and an uncertain physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model Developing quantitative Adverse Outcome Pathways: An ordinary differential equation-based computational framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1