在植物湾建造耶路撒冷:詹姆斯·巴内特(1827-1904)和约翰·格兰特(1857-1928)

IF 0.2 0 ARCHITECTURE ABE Journal Pub Date : 2019-07-28 DOI:10.4000/ABE.6344
M. Stiles
{"title":"在植物湾建造耶路撒冷:詹姆斯·巴内特(1827-1904)和约翰·格兰特(1857-1928)","authors":"M. Stiles","doi":"10.4000/ABE.6344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Scottish Enlightenment had many distinguished sons in Australia, from Lachlan Macquarie and Alexander Macleay to Charles Nicholson and John Dunmore Lang, among many others. Far more than their English counterparts, who long thought of Australia as merely a penal colony, prominent Scottish emigrants saw the possibility of building a new Jerusalem at the Antipodes.In this paper I have chosen to contrast the careers of two such men, the architect James Barnet (1827-1904) and the trade unionist John Grant (1857-1928). Both grew up in the building trade and served their apprenticeships in Britain but went on to very different careers in Australia. One became the Colonial Architect of New South Wales, determined to give the rapidly-growing colony a distinguished public architecture, much of whose prodigious legacy remains to this day. The other became the leader of the Stonemasons’ Society and a pioneer of the Australian labour movement, equally determined to give his new country a legacy of a different kind, the foundations of a more progressive and socially just society. Between them they represent the two poles of nineteenth-century Australian aspirations, the individual and the collective, and their careers offer an illuminating contrast of the ways in which men chose to make their way in the new world, and of how that world might be transformed in the light of reason with a particular Scottish inflection.","PeriodicalId":41296,"journal":{"name":"ABE Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Jerusalem at Botany Bay: James Barnet (1827-1904) and John Grant (1857-1928)\",\"authors\":\"M. Stiles\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/ABE.6344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Scottish Enlightenment had many distinguished sons in Australia, from Lachlan Macquarie and Alexander Macleay to Charles Nicholson and John Dunmore Lang, among many others. Far more than their English counterparts, who long thought of Australia as merely a penal colony, prominent Scottish emigrants saw the possibility of building a new Jerusalem at the Antipodes.In this paper I have chosen to contrast the careers of two such men, the architect James Barnet (1827-1904) and the trade unionist John Grant (1857-1928). Both grew up in the building trade and served their apprenticeships in Britain but went on to very different careers in Australia. One became the Colonial Architect of New South Wales, determined to give the rapidly-growing colony a distinguished public architecture, much of whose prodigious legacy remains to this day. The other became the leader of the Stonemasons’ Society and a pioneer of the Australian labour movement, equally determined to give his new country a legacy of a different kind, the foundations of a more progressive and socially just society. Between them they represent the two poles of nineteenth-century Australian aspirations, the individual and the collective, and their careers offer an illuminating contrast of the ways in which men chose to make their way in the new world, and of how that world might be transformed in the light of reason with a particular Scottish inflection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABE Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABE Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/ABE.6344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/ABE.6344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

苏格兰启蒙运动在澳大利亚有许多杰出的儿子,从拉克伦·麦考瑞(Lachlan Macquarie)和亚历山大·麦克利(Alexander Macleay)到查尔斯·尼科尔森(Charles Nicholson)和约翰·邓默·朗(John Dunmore Lang)等。与长期以来认为澳大利亚只是一个流放地的英国同行相比,著名的苏格兰移民看到了在安提波德建造新耶路撒冷的可能性。在这篇论文中,我选择对比两位这样的人的职业生涯,建筑师詹姆斯·巴内特(1827-1904)和工会主义者约翰·格兰特(1857-1928)。两人都在建筑行业长大,在英国当学徒,但在澳大利亚却有着截然不同的职业生涯。其中一位成为新南威尔士州的殖民建筑师,决心为这个迅速发展的殖民地打造一座杰出的公共建筑,其大部分惊人的遗产至今仍保留着。另一位成为了石匠协会的领袖和澳大利亚劳工运动的先驱,他同样决心给他的新国家一个不同的遗产,一个更进步、社会公正的社会的基础。在他们之间,他们代表了19世纪澳大利亚抱负的两极,即个人和集体,他们的职业生涯与男性在新世界中选择的方式形成了鲜明的对比,也与这个世界如何在理性的背景下通过一个特殊的苏格兰转折而改变形成了鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building Jerusalem at Botany Bay: James Barnet (1827-1904) and John Grant (1857-1928)
The Scottish Enlightenment had many distinguished sons in Australia, from Lachlan Macquarie and Alexander Macleay to Charles Nicholson and John Dunmore Lang, among many others. Far more than their English counterparts, who long thought of Australia as merely a penal colony, prominent Scottish emigrants saw the possibility of building a new Jerusalem at the Antipodes.In this paper I have chosen to contrast the careers of two such men, the architect James Barnet (1827-1904) and the trade unionist John Grant (1857-1928). Both grew up in the building trade and served their apprenticeships in Britain but went on to very different careers in Australia. One became the Colonial Architect of New South Wales, determined to give the rapidly-growing colony a distinguished public architecture, much of whose prodigious legacy remains to this day. The other became the leader of the Stonemasons’ Society and a pioneer of the Australian labour movement, equally determined to give his new country a legacy of a different kind, the foundations of a more progressive and socially just society. Between them they represent the two poles of nineteenth-century Australian aspirations, the individual and the collective, and their careers offer an illuminating contrast of the ways in which men chose to make their way in the new world, and of how that world might be transformed in the light of reason with a particular Scottish inflection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ABE Journal
ABE Journal ARCHITECTURE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Actors of Archival Building Documentation in Early Republican Turkey Introduction La ville et l’architecture européennes du XIXe siècle dans la Casbah d’Alger. Transformation et construction : entre liberté et idéal esthétique “Ecologically camping, eating, drinking wine.” Material and knowledge flows in the Minimum Cost Housing Group’s ECOL Operation, 1971-76 The Case for Self-Education. The Self-Help Manuals of the Communication Centre of Scientific Knowledge for Self-Reliance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1