自由主义对创造性信念的质疑

IF 1.2 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121
R. Sosa, A. Connor
{"title":"自由主义对创造性信念的质疑","authors":"R. Sosa, A. Connor","doi":"10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Creativity is considered here as a universal and diverse capacity that is central to full human agency. This view contrasts with beliefs that negate one’s creativity and that of others. Self-reports of creativity are examined in this paper taking inspiration from the study of oppression and liberation in the praxis of social change by the influential education theorist Paulo Freire. An exploratory survey of one hundred and fifty-nine professionals examines the types of perceptions and beliefs that designers and non-designers have about their own creativity, the creativity of others, and how they explain the nature of creativity. Based on how respondents explain their own creative capacities and those of others, three initial categories are formulated based on theories of social change: oppressive, oppressed, and liberating views of creativity. The findings demonstrate how these categories can be interpreted and implications for future work are discussed in the closing section.","PeriodicalId":43485,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Freirean interrogation of creativity beliefs\",\"authors\":\"R. Sosa, A. Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Creativity is considered here as a universal and diverse capacity that is central to full human agency. This view contrasts with beliefs that negate one’s creativity and that of others. Self-reports of creativity are examined in this paper taking inspiration from the study of oppression and liberation in the praxis of social change by the influential education theorist Paulo Freire. An exploratory survey of one hundred and fifty-nine professionals examines the types of perceptions and beliefs that designers and non-designers have about their own creativity, the creativity of others, and how they explain the nature of creativity. Based on how respondents explain their own creative capacities and those of others, three initial categories are formulated based on theories of social change: oppressive, oppressed, and liberating views of creativity. The findings demonstrate how these categories can be interpreted and implications for future work are discussed in the closing section.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

创造力在这里被认为是一种普遍而多样的能力,是人类全部能动性的核心。这种观点与否定个人和他人创造力的观点形成了鲜明对比。本文从颇具影响力的教育理论家保罗·弗莱雷对社会变革实践中的压迫和解放的研究中获得灵感,对创造力的自我报告进行了研究。一项对159名专业人士的探索性调查研究了设计师和非设计师对自己的创造力和他人的创造力的看法和信念,以及他们如何解释创造力的本质。根据受访者如何解释他们自己和他人的创造能力,基于社会变革理论,制定了三个最初的类别:压迫性,被压迫性和解放性的创造力观点。研究结果展示了如何解释这些类别,并在最后一节讨论了对未来工作的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Freirean interrogation of creativity beliefs
ABSTRACT Creativity is considered here as a universal and diverse capacity that is central to full human agency. This view contrasts with beliefs that negate one’s creativity and that of others. Self-reports of creativity are examined in this paper taking inspiration from the study of oppression and liberation in the praxis of social change by the influential education theorist Paulo Freire. An exploratory survey of one hundred and fifty-nine professionals examines the types of perceptions and beliefs that designers and non-designers have about their own creativity, the creativity of others, and how they explain the nature of creativity. Based on how respondents explain their own creative capacities and those of others, three initial categories are formulated based on theories of social change: oppressive, oppressed, and liberating views of creativity. The findings demonstrate how these categories can be interpreted and implications for future work are discussed in the closing section.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
27.80%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation is an international publication that provides a forum for discussing the nature and potential of creativity and innovation in design from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Design creativity and innovation is truly an interdisciplinary academic research field that will interest and stimulate researchers of engineering design, industrial design, architecture, art, and similar areas. The journal aims to not only promote existing research disciplines but also pioneer a new one that lies in the intermediate area between the domains of systems engineering, information technology, computer science, social science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, psychology, philosophy, linguistics, and related fields. The journal covers, but is not restricted to, the following topics: ·Theories on Design Creativity and Innovation ·Cognition of Design Creativity ·Innovative Process ·Inventive Process ·Analogical Reasoning for Design Creativity and Innovation ·Design Synthesis ·Method and Tools for Design Creativity and Innovation ·Representation of Design Creativity and Innovation ·Education for Design Creativity and Innovation ·Concept Generation and Inspiration.
期刊最新文献
Design thinking mindset: a user-centred approach toward innovation in the Welsh creative industries The influence of industrial designers and developmental technologists on design-driven innovation and related mechanisms The rise of design in higher education and non-design students’ experiences of learning through design Managing design innovation challenges in a digital environment Diagnosing the socio-technical refrigeration system with Radical Innovation Design methodology to target innovations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1