写作布拉格:菲利普·罗斯和约翰·厄普代克对捷克首都的文学探索

Q2 Arts and Humanities Philip Roth Studies Pub Date : 2020-10-16 DOI:10.1353/prs.2020.0014
Martyna Bryla
{"title":"写作布拉格:菲利普·罗斯和约翰·厄普代克对捷克首都的文学探索","authors":"Martyna Bryla","doi":"10.1353/prs.2020.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This essay establishes a productive critical dialogue between Philip Roth's and John Updike's representations of Prague under communism in The Prague Orgy (1985) and \"Bech in Czech\" (1987), respectively. Focusing on two central threads in both works—the intertwining of literature and politics, on the one hand, and Prague as a Jewish city, on the other—this essay argues that in mapping Prague, Roth and Updike revisit their protagonists' emblematic concerns, as well as reflect on the role of the writer and literature under different political systems, questioning George Steiner's conception of literature in the process.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing Prague: Philip Roth's and John Updike's Literary Takes on the Czech Capital\",\"authors\":\"Martyna Bryla\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/prs.2020.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This essay establishes a productive critical dialogue between Philip Roth's and John Updike's representations of Prague under communism in The Prague Orgy (1985) and \\\"Bech in Czech\\\" (1987), respectively. Focusing on two central threads in both works—the intertwining of literature and politics, on the one hand, and Prague as a Jewish city, on the other—this essay argues that in mapping Prague, Roth and Updike revisit their protagonists' emblematic concerns, as well as reflect on the role of the writer and literature under different political systems, questioning George Steiner's conception of literature in the process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2020.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2020.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:本文将菲利普·罗斯和约翰·厄普代克分别在《布拉格狂欢节》(1985)和《捷克的贝奇》(1987)中对共产主义下的布拉格进行富有成效的批判对话。本文聚焦于两部作品中的两条主线——文学与政治的交织,以及布拉格作为一座犹太城市——认为在绘制布拉格地图时,罗斯和厄普代克重新审视了主人公的象征性关切,并反思了作家和文学在不同政治制度下的作用,在这个过程中对乔治·施泰纳的文学观提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Writing Prague: Philip Roth's and John Updike's Literary Takes on the Czech Capital
ABSTRACT:This essay establishes a productive critical dialogue between Philip Roth's and John Updike's representations of Prague under communism in The Prague Orgy (1985) and "Bech in Czech" (1987), respectively. Focusing on two central threads in both works—the intertwining of literature and politics, on the one hand, and Prague as a Jewish city, on the other—this essay argues that in mapping Prague, Roth and Updike revisit their protagonists' emblematic concerns, as well as reflect on the role of the writer and literature under different political systems, questioning George Steiner's conception of literature in the process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editors' Note: Traveling with Roth Philip Roth and "My American Gang" In Medias Res Roth and Reputation versus Sex and Empowerment in The Dying Animal Hauntologies of Fiction: Reading Roth at the End of History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1