“不知何故,我自己并不这么认为:”白人身份政治和反关系在美国右翼对covid-19的反应中

IF 0.7 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES Social Identities Pub Date : 2022-06-16 DOI:10.1080/13504630.2022.2088489
Rebecca Scott
{"title":"“不知何故,我自己并不这么认为:”白人身份政治和反关系在美国右翼对covid-19的反应中","authors":"Rebecca Scott","doi":"10.1080/13504630.2022.2088489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The novel virus known as COVID-19 emerged in late 2019 and became a global pandemic in early 2020. The supposed origin of the virus in a ‘wet market’ in Wuhan, China led to the deployment of anti-Chinese discourse in the Trump administration’s treatment of the virus. The pre-eminent protective health response, masking, quickly became defined as un-American and as a threat to freedom among Trump supporters. Drawing on public conversations in print and social media in spring 2020, the connections are traced between the US right-wing reaction to the global pandemic and the deep structures of whiteness as an antirelational identity in racial capitalism. This US right’s reaction to COVID-19, specifically the identification of the virus as Chinese and mask refusal, makes up part of a wider effort to reassert whiteness as central to American national identity. This ill-conceived response to the pandemic reveals how whiteness works through antirelational identity politics: i.e. racism, the denial of interconnection, and the refusal of efforts toward collective well-being.","PeriodicalId":46853,"journal":{"name":"Social Identities","volume":"28 1","pages":"497 - 512"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Somehow, I don't see it for myself:' white identity politics and antirelationality in the US right’s response to covid-19\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13504630.2022.2088489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The novel virus known as COVID-19 emerged in late 2019 and became a global pandemic in early 2020. The supposed origin of the virus in a ‘wet market’ in Wuhan, China led to the deployment of anti-Chinese discourse in the Trump administration’s treatment of the virus. The pre-eminent protective health response, masking, quickly became defined as un-American and as a threat to freedom among Trump supporters. Drawing on public conversations in print and social media in spring 2020, the connections are traced between the US right-wing reaction to the global pandemic and the deep structures of whiteness as an antirelational identity in racial capitalism. This US right’s reaction to COVID-19, specifically the identification of the virus as Chinese and mask refusal, makes up part of a wider effort to reassert whiteness as central to American national identity. This ill-conceived response to the pandemic reveals how whiteness works through antirelational identity politics: i.e. racism, the denial of interconnection, and the refusal of efforts toward collective well-being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Identities\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"497 - 512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Identities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2022.2088489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Identities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2022.2088489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要被称为新冠肺炎的新型病毒于2019年末出现,并于2020年初成为全球大流行。病毒起源于中国武汉的一个“湿货市场”,这导致特朗普政府在处理病毒时使用了反华言论。在特朗普的支持者中,最著名的保护性健康反应——戴口罩——很快被定义为非美国的,是对自由的威胁。根据2020年春季印刷品和社交媒体上的公开对话,可以追溯到美国右翼对全球疫情的反应与种族资本主义中白人作为反种族身份的深层结构之间的联系。这一美国右翼对新冠肺炎的反应,特别是将该病毒识别为中国人并拒绝戴口罩,构成了重申白人是美国民族认同核心的更广泛努力的一部分。这种对疫情的反应考虑不周,揭示了白人是如何通过反关系的身份政治发挥作用的:即种族主义、否认相互联系和拒绝为集体福祉所做的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Somehow, I don't see it for myself:' white identity politics and antirelationality in the US right’s response to covid-19
ABSTRACT The novel virus known as COVID-19 emerged in late 2019 and became a global pandemic in early 2020. The supposed origin of the virus in a ‘wet market’ in Wuhan, China led to the deployment of anti-Chinese discourse in the Trump administration’s treatment of the virus. The pre-eminent protective health response, masking, quickly became defined as un-American and as a threat to freedom among Trump supporters. Drawing on public conversations in print and social media in spring 2020, the connections are traced between the US right-wing reaction to the global pandemic and the deep structures of whiteness as an antirelational identity in racial capitalism. This US right’s reaction to COVID-19, specifically the identification of the virus as Chinese and mask refusal, makes up part of a wider effort to reassert whiteness as central to American national identity. This ill-conceived response to the pandemic reveals how whiteness works through antirelational identity politics: i.e. racism, the denial of interconnection, and the refusal of efforts toward collective well-being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Identities
Social Identities ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Recent years have witnessed considerable worldwide changes concerning social identities such as race, nation and ethnicity, as well as the emergence of new forms of racism and nationalism as discriminatory exclusions. Social Identities aims to furnish an interdisciplinary and international focal point for theorizing issues at the interface of social identities. The journal is especially concerned to address these issues in the context of the transforming political economies and cultures of postmodern and postcolonial conditions. Social Identities is intended as a forum for contesting ideas and debates concerning the formations of, and transformations in, socially significant identities, their attendant forms of material exclusion and power.
期刊最新文献
A review essay on Muslim victimization in New Crusade Wars ‘The statue is a painful reminder of the past’: South African staff and students’ perspectives on MT Steyn statue removal Blurring belongings: navigating Indian and Adivasi identities in an area of protracted violence in India Turkish politics and ‘the people’: mass mobilisation and populism ‘Social psychology of the emergence of Iranian neo-nationalism discourse in present-day Iran: a case study of the Persian Gulf Facebook channel’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1