b区块链,公共信托,法律与治理

S. Ranchordás
{"title":"b区块链,公共信托,法律与治理","authors":"S. Ranchordás","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00602005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2018, blockchain was the word of the year. There was not a day that went by without a news article on a novel application of blockchain technology. This distributed-ledger technology was the solution for corruption in elections in low-trust societies, it would facilitate the registration of land and make the role of notaries superfluous, and it could even replace traditional forms of state identification. Blockchain, a complex technology that is based on peer-to-peer validation, has the potential to address the trust, transparency, and bureaucracy challenges that several public bodies currently face. Furthermore, this technology creates room for new collaboration opportunities between governments and citizens. It verifies close to real time transactions, simplifies regulatory compliance, promises efficiency gains through the reduction of intermediaries, and reduces the risks of fraud and cybercrime. Despite the growing popularity of blockchain, very few legal scholars in 2018 could seriously argue that they understood the functioning of blockchain and only a small number of them was indeed able to explain it to a broader audience. Hundreds of scientific and popular articles and books were published, new academic journals on blockchain were created, and numerous events on blockchain were organized. Nonetheless, the implications of blockchain for public law, and the way in which blockchain can be used to replace the trust that citizens have on state authorities remained largely underexplored. This special issue includes three contributions that were presented at the conference ‘Blockchain, Public Trust, Law and Governance’ which took place at the University of Groningen at the end of 2018. At this two-day event, public law and governance issues regarding blockchain were discussed from different perspectives. This special issue is timely as blockchain has received a great deal of attention in academia and beyond. Throughout the world, multiple governments are experimenting with blockchain in different areas. However, blockchain remains a black box to many citizens, public bodies, and companies.","PeriodicalId":37233,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22134514-00602005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blockchain, Public Trust, Law and Governance\",\"authors\":\"S. Ranchordás\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22134514-00602005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2018, blockchain was the word of the year. There was not a day that went by without a news article on a novel application of blockchain technology. This distributed-ledger technology was the solution for corruption in elections in low-trust societies, it would facilitate the registration of land and make the role of notaries superfluous, and it could even replace traditional forms of state identification. Blockchain, a complex technology that is based on peer-to-peer validation, has the potential to address the trust, transparency, and bureaucracy challenges that several public bodies currently face. Furthermore, this technology creates room for new collaboration opportunities between governments and citizens. It verifies close to real time transactions, simplifies regulatory compliance, promises efficiency gains through the reduction of intermediaries, and reduces the risks of fraud and cybercrime. Despite the growing popularity of blockchain, very few legal scholars in 2018 could seriously argue that they understood the functioning of blockchain and only a small number of them was indeed able to explain it to a broader audience. Hundreds of scientific and popular articles and books were published, new academic journals on blockchain were created, and numerous events on blockchain were organized. Nonetheless, the implications of blockchain for public law, and the way in which blockchain can be used to replace the trust that citizens have on state authorities remained largely underexplored. This special issue includes three contributions that were presented at the conference ‘Blockchain, Public Trust, Law and Governance’ which took place at the University of Groningen at the end of 2018. At this two-day event, public law and governance issues regarding blockchain were discussed from different perspectives. This special issue is timely as blockchain has received a great deal of attention in academia and beyond. Throughout the world, multiple governments are experimenting with blockchain in different areas. However, blockchain remains a black box to many citizens, public bodies, and companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22134514-00602005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00602005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00602005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2018年,区块链成为年度词汇。没有一天没有一篇关于区块链技术新颖应用的新闻文章。这种分布式账本技术解决了低信任社会选举中的腐败问题,它将促进土地登记,使公证人的作用变得多余,甚至可以取代传统形式的国家身份识别。区块链是一种基于对等验证的复杂技术,有可能解决几个公共机构目前面临的信任、透明度和官僚主义挑战。此外,这项技术为政府和公民之间的新合作机会创造了空间。它验证接近实时的交易,简化监管合规性,承诺通过减少中介机构来提高效率,并降低欺诈和网络犯罪的风险。尽管区块链越来越受欢迎,但在2018年,很少有法律学者能够认真地辩称他们理解区块链的功能,而且只有一小部分学者能够向更广泛的受众解释它。发表了数百篇科学和流行的文章和书籍,创建了新的区块链学术期刊,组织了许多关于区块链的活动。尽管如此,区块链对公法的影响,以及区块链可以用来取代公民对国家当局的信任的方式,在很大程度上仍然没有得到充分的探索。本特刊包括2018年底在格罗宁根大学举行的“区块链、公共信任、法律与治理”会议上发表的三篇文章。在为期两天的活动中,从不同角度讨论了区块链的公法和治理问题。由于区块链在学术界和其他领域受到了极大的关注,本期特刊非常及时。在世界各地,多个政府都在不同领域尝试区块链。然而,区块链仍然是许多公民、公共机构和公司的黑匣子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blockchain, Public Trust, Law and Governance
In 2018, blockchain was the word of the year. There was not a day that went by without a news article on a novel application of blockchain technology. This distributed-ledger technology was the solution for corruption in elections in low-trust societies, it would facilitate the registration of land and make the role of notaries superfluous, and it could even replace traditional forms of state identification. Blockchain, a complex technology that is based on peer-to-peer validation, has the potential to address the trust, transparency, and bureaucracy challenges that several public bodies currently face. Furthermore, this technology creates room for new collaboration opportunities between governments and citizens. It verifies close to real time transactions, simplifies regulatory compliance, promises efficiency gains through the reduction of intermediaries, and reduces the risks of fraud and cybercrime. Despite the growing popularity of blockchain, very few legal scholars in 2018 could seriously argue that they understood the functioning of blockchain and only a small number of them was indeed able to explain it to a broader audience. Hundreds of scientific and popular articles and books were published, new academic journals on blockchain were created, and numerous events on blockchain were organized. Nonetheless, the implications of blockchain for public law, and the way in which blockchain can be used to replace the trust that citizens have on state authorities remained largely underexplored. This special issue includes three contributions that were presented at the conference ‘Blockchain, Public Trust, Law and Governance’ which took place at the University of Groningen at the end of 2018. At this two-day event, public law and governance issues regarding blockchain were discussed from different perspectives. This special issue is timely as blockchain has received a great deal of attention in academia and beyond. Throughout the world, multiple governments are experimenting with blockchain in different areas. However, blockchain remains a black box to many citizens, public bodies, and companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Green Bond Financing and Corporate Environmental Performance Neuroenhancement Patentability and the Boundaries Conundrum in Psychiatric Disorders Developing Offshore Wind Farms – A Comparison and Analysis of the Legal and Governance Frameworks of the North Sea Coastal States Transfer of Climate Litigation to Biodiversity Protection? Money Makes The World Go Hot – Climate Litigation Against Banks?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1