阴茎癌症保留器官手术后的性功能和尿功能:一项对单个地区连续3年患者的问卷研究

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2022-04-30 DOI:10.1177/20514158221081320
E. Zimmermann, Y. Embury-Young, D. Dickerson, A. Manjunath
{"title":"阴茎癌症保留器官手术后的性功能和尿功能:一项对单个地区连续3年患者的问卷研究","authors":"E. Zimmermann, Y. Embury-Young, D. Dickerson, A. Manjunath","doi":"10.1177/20514158221081320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Association of Urology recommends organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for localised penile cancer. We aimed to assess the impact of OSS including glans reconstruction on erectile, sexual and urinary function. Local ethics approval was obtained. Patients coded for glans resurfacing, glansectomy and partial penectomy from 2015 to 2018 were identified across two trusts. Background characteristics, histology, staging and follow-up were recorded. Two questionnaires were used to assess function: a custom questionnaire on patient reported outcomes and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire. Anonymised questionnaires were sent to each patient with prepaid return envelopes included. A total of 28/64 (44%) questionnaires were returned complete. The mean age of participants was 71(35–93) and body mass index (BMI) 28(20–38). There was 1 glans resurfacing, 1 circumcision and wide local excision, 8 glansectomy and 18 partial-penectomy patients (of which 4 and 13 declined reconstruction, respectively). Sexual satisfaction (SS) and erectile function (EF) declined postoperatively while sexual desire was preserved. Subjective glans sensitivity reduced independent of technique. Glans reconstruction reduced the impact on IIEF in glansectomy (13.5 versus 25.3, p < 0.05) but not partial-penectomy (13.4 versus 13.8). SS was worse in partial-penectomy patients undergoing glans reconstruction on patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) (SS change: −4.0/10 with reconstruction versus −0.9/10 without, p < 0.05). Urinary symptoms appear limited to spraying and change of flow of urine, with some patients reporting the need to pass urine sitting down. Sexual and erectile function is impaired post-OSS in penile cancer while sexual desire is preserved. Simultaneous glans reconstruction appears to minimise this impact in glansectomy patients when assessed by IIEF. A validated PROM questionnaire could improve preoperative counselling, and guide postoperative sexual recovery.","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual and urinary function after organ sparing surgery for penile cancer: A questionnaire study of consecutive patients over a 3-year period in a single region\",\"authors\":\"E. Zimmermann, Y. Embury-Young, D. Dickerson, A. Manjunath\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20514158221081320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Association of Urology recommends organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for localised penile cancer. We aimed to assess the impact of OSS including glans reconstruction on erectile, sexual and urinary function. Local ethics approval was obtained. Patients coded for glans resurfacing, glansectomy and partial penectomy from 2015 to 2018 were identified across two trusts. Background characteristics, histology, staging and follow-up were recorded. Two questionnaires were used to assess function: a custom questionnaire on patient reported outcomes and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire. Anonymised questionnaires were sent to each patient with prepaid return envelopes included. A total of 28/64 (44%) questionnaires were returned complete. The mean age of participants was 71(35–93) and body mass index (BMI) 28(20–38). There was 1 glans resurfacing, 1 circumcision and wide local excision, 8 glansectomy and 18 partial-penectomy patients (of which 4 and 13 declined reconstruction, respectively). Sexual satisfaction (SS) and erectile function (EF) declined postoperatively while sexual desire was preserved. Subjective glans sensitivity reduced independent of technique. Glans reconstruction reduced the impact on IIEF in glansectomy (13.5 versus 25.3, p < 0.05) but not partial-penectomy (13.4 versus 13.8). SS was worse in partial-penectomy patients undergoing glans reconstruction on patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) (SS change: −4.0/10 with reconstruction versus −0.9/10 without, p < 0.05). Urinary symptoms appear limited to spraying and change of flow of urine, with some patients reporting the need to pass urine sitting down. Sexual and erectile function is impaired post-OSS in penile cancer while sexual desire is preserved. Simultaneous glans reconstruction appears to minimise this impact in glansectomy patients when assessed by IIEF. A validated PROM questionnaire could improve preoperative counselling, and guide postoperative sexual recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221081320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221081320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲泌尿外科协会建议对局部阴茎癌症进行保留器官手术(OSS)。我们旨在评估OSS对勃起、性和泌尿功能的影响,包括龟头重建。已获得当地伦理批准。从2015年到2018年,两个信托机构确定了龟头表面置换术、龟头切除术和部分开放术的患者。记录背景特征、组织学、分期和随访情况。两份问卷用于评估功能:一份是关于患者报告结果的定制问卷,另一份是国际勃起功能指数问卷。匿名调查问卷发送给每位患者,其中包括预付的返回信封。共有28/64份(44%)问卷完整返回。参与者的平均年龄为71岁(35-93岁),体重指数为28岁(20-30岁)。其中1例为龟头表面置换术,1例为包皮环切术和广泛局部切除术,8例为切除龟头术,18例为部分切除术(其中4例和13例分别拒绝重建)。术后性满意度(SS)和勃起功能(EF)下降,性欲得以维持。主观龟头敏感度降低与技术无关。腺体重建降低了切除腺体时对IIEF的影响(13.5对25.3,p<0.05),但没有部分切除术(13.4对13.8)。在患者报告的结果测量(PROM)中,接受腺体重建的部分切除术患者的SS更差(SS变化:重建后的−4.0/10与未重建的−0.9/10,p<0.01)。尿液症状似乎仅限于喷雾和流量变化一些患者报告说需要坐着排尿。在阴茎癌症中,性功能和勃起功能在OSS后受损,同时性欲得以保留。当IIEF评估时,同时重建龟头似乎可以最大限度地减少龟头切除患者的这种影响。经验证的胎膜早破问卷可以改善术前咨询,并指导术后性康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sexual and urinary function after organ sparing surgery for penile cancer: A questionnaire study of consecutive patients over a 3-year period in a single region
The European Association of Urology recommends organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for localised penile cancer. We aimed to assess the impact of OSS including glans reconstruction on erectile, sexual and urinary function. Local ethics approval was obtained. Patients coded for glans resurfacing, glansectomy and partial penectomy from 2015 to 2018 were identified across two trusts. Background characteristics, histology, staging and follow-up were recorded. Two questionnaires were used to assess function: a custom questionnaire on patient reported outcomes and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire. Anonymised questionnaires were sent to each patient with prepaid return envelopes included. A total of 28/64 (44%) questionnaires were returned complete. The mean age of participants was 71(35–93) and body mass index (BMI) 28(20–38). There was 1 glans resurfacing, 1 circumcision and wide local excision, 8 glansectomy and 18 partial-penectomy patients (of which 4 and 13 declined reconstruction, respectively). Sexual satisfaction (SS) and erectile function (EF) declined postoperatively while sexual desire was preserved. Subjective glans sensitivity reduced independent of technique. Glans reconstruction reduced the impact on IIEF in glansectomy (13.5 versus 25.3, p < 0.05) but not partial-penectomy (13.4 versus 13.8). SS was worse in partial-penectomy patients undergoing glans reconstruction on patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) (SS change: −4.0/10 with reconstruction versus −0.9/10 without, p < 0.05). Urinary symptoms appear limited to spraying and change of flow of urine, with some patients reporting the need to pass urine sitting down. Sexual and erectile function is impaired post-OSS in penile cancer while sexual desire is preserved. Simultaneous glans reconstruction appears to minimise this impact in glansectomy patients when assessed by IIEF. A validated PROM questionnaire could improve preoperative counselling, and guide postoperative sexual recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1