编辑

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK European Journal of Social Work Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1080/13691457.2023.2215654
Jochen Devlieghere, R. Roose
{"title":"编辑","authors":"Jochen Devlieghere, R. Roose","doi":"10.1080/13691457.2023.2215654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this year’s fourth issue, we take a closer look at social work education and social work as a profession. To better understand the history of social work education, we have to go back as early as the end of the nineteenth century. This is when social work education programmes were first established. The first full-time curricula for social work emerge in the early twentieth century. At the time, however, this was not evident as there was debate as to whether social work was a real profession. This debate – the so-called Flexner debate – was triggered started in 1915 at the 42nd National Conference of Charities and Correction in Baltimore, where Abraham Flexner addressed the audience. At the time, Flexner contributed to the recognition of medical practice as a scientific profession and was considered an authority in his field. At the conference, he claimed that social work, unlike medicine, was not a true scientific profession. According to him, social work was too abstract and works with unclear objectives to be recognised as a scientific profession. He also pointed out in that social work mainly relied on other ‘real’ professionals – such as medicine and psychology – to solve problems they faced. Although the debate on what kind of professional social work is, is still ongoing, more and more social work education programmes were emerging, and the Global definition of social work also recognised it as an academic discipline. With this issue, we further highlight some of these professionalisation debates and their significance for social work in general and social work education in particular. In this way, we hope to further stimulate the debate on social work as a profession. We wish you much reading pleasure.","PeriodicalId":12060,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Work","volume":"26 1","pages":"611 - 611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Jochen Devlieghere, R. Roose\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691457.2023.2215654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this year’s fourth issue, we take a closer look at social work education and social work as a profession. To better understand the history of social work education, we have to go back as early as the end of the nineteenth century. This is when social work education programmes were first established. The first full-time curricula for social work emerge in the early twentieth century. At the time, however, this was not evident as there was debate as to whether social work was a real profession. This debate – the so-called Flexner debate – was triggered started in 1915 at the 42nd National Conference of Charities and Correction in Baltimore, where Abraham Flexner addressed the audience. At the time, Flexner contributed to the recognition of medical practice as a scientific profession and was considered an authority in his field. At the conference, he claimed that social work, unlike medicine, was not a true scientific profession. According to him, social work was too abstract and works with unclear objectives to be recognised as a scientific profession. He also pointed out in that social work mainly relied on other ‘real’ professionals – such as medicine and psychology – to solve problems they faced. Although the debate on what kind of professional social work is, is still ongoing, more and more social work education programmes were emerging, and the Global definition of social work also recognised it as an academic discipline. With this issue, we further highlight some of these professionalisation debates and their significance for social work in general and social work education in particular. In this way, we hope to further stimulate the debate on social work as a profession. We wish you much reading pleasure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Social Work\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"611 - 611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2215654\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2215654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在今年的第4期,我们将深入探讨社会工作教育和社会工作这一专业。为了更好地了解社会工作教育的历史,我们必须追溯到19世纪末。这是社会工作教育课程首次建立的时候。第一个全日制社会工作课程出现在二十世纪初。然而,在当时,这并不明显,因为社会工作是否是一种真正的职业存在争议。这场辩论——所谓的弗莱克斯纳辩论——始于1915年在巴尔的摩举行的第42届全国慈善与矫正会议上,亚伯拉罕·弗莱克斯纳在会上向听众发表讲话。当时,Flexner对医学实践作为一种科学职业的认可做出了贡献,并被认为是他所在领域的权威。在会议上,他声称社会工作不像医学,不是一个真正的科学职业。在他看来,社会工作过于抽象,工作目标不明确,无法被视为一种科学职业。他还指出,社会工作主要依靠其他“真正的”专业人士——比如医学和心理学——来解决他们面临的问题。虽然关于什么是专业社会工作的争论仍在继续,但越来越多的社会工作教育项目正在出现,全球社会工作的定义也将其视为一门学科。在这个问题上,我们进一步强调了这些专业化辩论及其对一般社会工作,特别是社会工作教育的意义。通过这种方式,我们希望进一步激发社会工作作为一种职业的辩论。祝您阅读愉快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial
In this year’s fourth issue, we take a closer look at social work education and social work as a profession. To better understand the history of social work education, we have to go back as early as the end of the nineteenth century. This is when social work education programmes were first established. The first full-time curricula for social work emerge in the early twentieth century. At the time, however, this was not evident as there was debate as to whether social work was a real profession. This debate – the so-called Flexner debate – was triggered started in 1915 at the 42nd National Conference of Charities and Correction in Baltimore, where Abraham Flexner addressed the audience. At the time, Flexner contributed to the recognition of medical practice as a scientific profession and was considered an authority in his field. At the conference, he claimed that social work, unlike medicine, was not a true scientific profession. According to him, social work was too abstract and works with unclear objectives to be recognised as a scientific profession. He also pointed out in that social work mainly relied on other ‘real’ professionals – such as medicine and psychology – to solve problems they faced. Although the debate on what kind of professional social work is, is still ongoing, more and more social work education programmes were emerging, and the Global definition of social work also recognised it as an academic discipline. With this issue, we further highlight some of these professionalisation debates and their significance for social work in general and social work education in particular. In this way, we hope to further stimulate the debate on social work as a profession. We wish you much reading pleasure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Social Work provides a forum for the social professions in all parts of Europe and beyond. It analyses and promotes European and international developments in social work, social policy, social service institutions, and strategies for social change by publishing refereed papers on contemporary key issues. Contributions include theoretical debates, empirical studies, research notes, country perspectives, and reviews. It maintains an interdisciplinary perspective which recognises positively the diversity of cultural and conceptual traditions in which the social professions of Europe are grounded. In particular it examines emerging European paradigms in methodology and comparative analysis.
期刊最新文献
When the outside penetrates the inside: the relationship between Palestinian Israeli and Jewish Israeli social workers in mixed cities during the events of May 2021 Discretion for whom? Local policies and the agency problem between politicians and care managers in Swedish social service ‘There is a fear of not being SUPER knowledgeable’ – social workers striving to enhance children’s participation in the assessment process for disability support The bridging role of social work: the quest towards installing a structural approach within primary health care Social work competence in disaster management: an integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1