Tomasz Pietrasiewicz:大屠杀的艺术与记忆

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Analecta Politica Pub Date : 2018-10-25 DOI:10.18566/APOLIT.V8N15.A05
Jan P. Hudzik
{"title":"Tomasz Pietrasiewicz:大屠杀的艺术与记忆","authors":"Jan P. Hudzik","doi":"10.18566/APOLIT.V8N15.A05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the issues of art and memory after the Holocaust in the artistic works of Tomasz Pietrasiewicz: a theatre director and a culture animator. The focus is on the following two questions. The first one is about the context in which his “theatre of memory” is functioning, that is also about the cultural factors shaping the memory of people living in the realities of Lublin at the turn of the 20th/21st c. The second one pertains to the art and the artist’s condition: what language and means of expression does he use, and why does he do it at all, why has he decided to take responsibility for the city’s tragic history? The text consists of six parts. The first part describes the origin of the Theatre, the second one explains the notion of \"islands of time” as an interpretation tool, the third part presents urban semiotics of Wladyslaw Panas, the fourth one provides a description of an “utopian” project: “Lublin. 43 thousands”, conceived here as a universal machine of memory, the fifth one concerns the mysteries and installations, understood as archaeology of memory, and the sixth part discusses the artist’s responsibility.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"8 1","pages":"255-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tomasz Pietrasiewicz: art and memory of the Holocaust\",\"authors\":\"Jan P. Hudzik\",\"doi\":\"10.18566/APOLIT.V8N15.A05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the issues of art and memory after the Holocaust in the artistic works of Tomasz Pietrasiewicz: a theatre director and a culture animator. The focus is on the following two questions. The first one is about the context in which his “theatre of memory” is functioning, that is also about the cultural factors shaping the memory of people living in the realities of Lublin at the turn of the 20th/21st c. The second one pertains to the art and the artist’s condition: what language and means of expression does he use, and why does he do it at all, why has he decided to take responsibility for the city’s tragic history? The text consists of six parts. The first part describes the origin of the Theatre, the second one explains the notion of \\\"islands of time” as an interpretation tool, the third part presents urban semiotics of Wladyslaw Panas, the fourth one provides a description of an “utopian” project: “Lublin. 43 thousands”, conceived here as a universal machine of memory, the fifth one concerns the mysteries and installations, understood as archaeology of memory, and the sixth part discusses the artist’s responsibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analecta Politica\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"255-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analecta Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18566/APOLIT.V8N15.A05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analecta Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18566/APOLIT.V8N15.A05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文讨论了戏剧导演兼文化动画师Tomasz Pietrasiewicz的艺术作品中大屠杀后的艺术和记忆问题。重点是以下两个问题。第一个是关于环境他的“剧院的记忆”功能,这也是对文化因素形成的记忆人生活在卢布林的现实在20 / 21 c。第二个属于艺术和艺术家的条件:他使用什么语言和表达方式,以及他为什么做,为什么他决定负责城市的悲剧性的历史吗?全文共分六个部分。第一部分描述了剧院的起源,第二部分解释了“时间之岛”作为一种解释工具的概念,第三部分介绍了瓦迪斯瓦夫·帕纳斯的城市符号学,第四部分提供了一个“乌托邦”项目的描述:“卢布林”。“43,000”,在这里被视为记忆的通用机器,第五部分涉及神秘和装置,被理解为记忆的考古学,第六部分讨论艺术家的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tomasz Pietrasiewicz: art and memory of the Holocaust
The article discusses the issues of art and memory after the Holocaust in the artistic works of Tomasz Pietrasiewicz: a theatre director and a culture animator. The focus is on the following two questions. The first one is about the context in which his “theatre of memory” is functioning, that is also about the cultural factors shaping the memory of people living in the realities of Lublin at the turn of the 20th/21st c. The second one pertains to the art and the artist’s condition: what language and means of expression does he use, and why does he do it at all, why has he decided to take responsibility for the city’s tragic history? The text consists of six parts. The first part describes the origin of the Theatre, the second one explains the notion of "islands of time” as an interpretation tool, the third part presents urban semiotics of Wladyslaw Panas, the fourth one provides a description of an “utopian” project: “Lublin. 43 thousands”, conceived here as a universal machine of memory, the fifth one concerns the mysteries and installations, understood as archaeology of memory, and the sixth part discusses the artist’s responsibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analecta Politica
Analecta Politica POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Flores Treviño, María Eugenia. Dispositivos discursivos del poder. Política, educación y género. México: Res Pública, 2021 Partidos y sistemas de partidos en América Latina. Éxito electoral y cambio político (1988- 2016) / Aldo Adrián Martínez Hernández. - Toluca, México: Instituto Electoral del Estado de México, 2022 Discurso y contrahegemonía en el Sur global: el caso de la lucha socioambiental en Chubut Etnografía de las conferencias de prensa de Andrés Manuel López Obrador y análisis de su lista de reproducción en YouTube (2018-2022) La gramaticalización del mundo y las instituciones sociales y políticas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1