符号与事物:蒸汽时代的数学

J. Wess
{"title":"符号与事物:蒸汽时代的数学","authors":"J. Wess","doi":"10.1080/26375451.2022.2036410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"simple algebra based on the laws of probability, under certain assumptions. For example, he assumes that if A and B die in the same year, the probability that A dies first is the same as the probability that B dies first. In this paper Morgan does not use anything that might be called ‘higher’ mathematics: his main concern is to extract useful information from the tables of life expectancy. He recommends the table culled from the records of the town of Northampton. Morgan wrote several more papers on actuarial matters for the Philosophical Transactions and was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1790. He also wrote some highly controversial pamphlets about the government’s economic policies, and he became involved in radical activities. This led to his being summoned to appear as a witness in the trial of Horne Tooke for High Treason in 1793, although he did not, in fact, have to give evidence. His statements on the affairs of the Equitable Assurance Company were increasingly attracting adverse comments from influential and knowledgeable people. It was clear that the tables from Northampton were not a good basis for insurance valuations, particularly in the case of the people who actually had the means to invest in life policies. In 1819, the young Charles Babbage became interested in the subject and drew up a scheme of his own, which he sent to Morgan, asking for his opinion. Morgan’s reply was phrased in the elaborate language of the time, but in effect it was a curt refusal to engage in debate. The controversy came to a head in 1826, with the publication of Babbage’s Comparative View of the Various Institutions for the Assurance of Lives. In the same year, Francis Baily, who was later to become famous for his astronomical discoveries but had already published books on actuarial matters, wrote a letter critical of Morgan to the Times, to which Morgan responded in his typically assertive way. A couple of years later, an anonymous letter addressed to Morgan appeared in the Philosophical Magazine, with the opening ‘Dear Sir, Having unfortunately failed on some former occasions, of fully comprehending the meaning of your expressions... ’. The author was in fact Thomas Young, the eminent polymath, and the letter is printed in his MiscellaneousWorks, edited by Peacock. The need for improved data and amore sophisticated basis for the calculation of premiums was generally recognized. When William Morgan died in 1833, he had been overtaken in his position as the leader of the actuarial profession, but he is rightly remembered as one of the pioneers in the field.","PeriodicalId":36683,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Mathematics","volume":"37 1","pages":"82 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symbols and things: mathematics in the age of steam\",\"authors\":\"J. Wess\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26375451.2022.2036410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"simple algebra based on the laws of probability, under certain assumptions. For example, he assumes that if A and B die in the same year, the probability that A dies first is the same as the probability that B dies first. In this paper Morgan does not use anything that might be called ‘higher’ mathematics: his main concern is to extract useful information from the tables of life expectancy. He recommends the table culled from the records of the town of Northampton. Morgan wrote several more papers on actuarial matters for the Philosophical Transactions and was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1790. He also wrote some highly controversial pamphlets about the government’s economic policies, and he became involved in radical activities. This led to his being summoned to appear as a witness in the trial of Horne Tooke for High Treason in 1793, although he did not, in fact, have to give evidence. His statements on the affairs of the Equitable Assurance Company were increasingly attracting adverse comments from influential and knowledgeable people. It was clear that the tables from Northampton were not a good basis for insurance valuations, particularly in the case of the people who actually had the means to invest in life policies. In 1819, the young Charles Babbage became interested in the subject and drew up a scheme of his own, which he sent to Morgan, asking for his opinion. Morgan’s reply was phrased in the elaborate language of the time, but in effect it was a curt refusal to engage in debate. The controversy came to a head in 1826, with the publication of Babbage’s Comparative View of the Various Institutions for the Assurance of Lives. In the same year, Francis Baily, who was later to become famous for his astronomical discoveries but had already published books on actuarial matters, wrote a letter critical of Morgan to the Times, to which Morgan responded in his typically assertive way. A couple of years later, an anonymous letter addressed to Morgan appeared in the Philosophical Magazine, with the opening ‘Dear Sir, Having unfortunately failed on some former occasions, of fully comprehending the meaning of your expressions... ’. The author was in fact Thomas Young, the eminent polymath, and the letter is printed in his MiscellaneousWorks, edited by Peacock. The need for improved data and amore sophisticated basis for the calculation of premiums was generally recognized. When William Morgan died in 1833, he had been overtaken in his position as the leader of the actuarial profession, but he is rightly remembered as one of the pioneers in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal for the History of Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"82 - 85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal for the History of Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2022.2036410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the History of Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2022.2036410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一定的假设下,基于概率定律的简单代数。例如,他假设如果A和B在同一年死亡,A先死的概率和B先死的概率是一样的。在这篇论文中,摩根没有使用任何可能被称为“高等”数学的东西:他主要关心的是从预期寿命表中提取有用的信息。他推荐从北安普顿镇的记录中挑选的表格。摩根又为《哲学学报》写了几篇关于精算问题的论文,并于1790年被选为皇家学会会员。他还写了一些关于政府经济政策的极具争议的小册子,他还参与了激进活动。这导致他在1793年霍恩·图克叛国罪的审判中被传唤出庭作证,尽管他实际上并不需要作证。他就公平保险公司的事务发表的声明越来越多地引起有影响力和知识渊博人士的反对意见。很明显,北安普顿的表格并不是保险估价的良好基础,特别是对于那些真正有能力投资人寿保险的人来说。1819年,年轻的查尔斯·巴贝奇对这个问题产生了兴趣,并制定了一个自己的计划,他把这个计划寄给了摩根,征求他的意见。摩根的回答是用当时精致的语言表达的,但实际上,这是一个简短的拒绝参与辩论。1826年,随着巴贝奇《各种保障生命制度的比较观点》的出版,这场争论达到了顶峰。同年,弗朗西斯·贝利(Francis Baily)给《泰晤士报》写了一封批评摩根的信,摩根以他一贯的自信方式回应了这封信。贝利后来因他的天文发现而出名,但他已经出版了精算方面的书籍。几年后,《哲学杂志》上出现了一封写给摩根的匿名信,信的开头写道:“亲爱的先生,不幸的是,在过去的一些场合,我未能完全理解您表达的意思……””。这封信的作者实际上是著名的博学家托马斯·杨,这封信被印在了他的《杂记》中,由皮科克编辑。人们普遍认识到需要改进数据和更精密的保费计算基础。当威廉·摩根于1833年去世时,他作为精算界领袖的地位已经被超越,但他作为该领域的先驱之一被人们铭记是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Symbols and things: mathematics in the age of steam
simple algebra based on the laws of probability, under certain assumptions. For example, he assumes that if A and B die in the same year, the probability that A dies first is the same as the probability that B dies first. In this paper Morgan does not use anything that might be called ‘higher’ mathematics: his main concern is to extract useful information from the tables of life expectancy. He recommends the table culled from the records of the town of Northampton. Morgan wrote several more papers on actuarial matters for the Philosophical Transactions and was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1790. He also wrote some highly controversial pamphlets about the government’s economic policies, and he became involved in radical activities. This led to his being summoned to appear as a witness in the trial of Horne Tooke for High Treason in 1793, although he did not, in fact, have to give evidence. His statements on the affairs of the Equitable Assurance Company were increasingly attracting adverse comments from influential and knowledgeable people. It was clear that the tables from Northampton were not a good basis for insurance valuations, particularly in the case of the people who actually had the means to invest in life policies. In 1819, the young Charles Babbage became interested in the subject and drew up a scheme of his own, which he sent to Morgan, asking for his opinion. Morgan’s reply was phrased in the elaborate language of the time, but in effect it was a curt refusal to engage in debate. The controversy came to a head in 1826, with the publication of Babbage’s Comparative View of the Various Institutions for the Assurance of Lives. In the same year, Francis Baily, who was later to become famous for his astronomical discoveries but had already published books on actuarial matters, wrote a letter critical of Morgan to the Times, to which Morgan responded in his typically assertive way. A couple of years later, an anonymous letter addressed to Morgan appeared in the Philosophical Magazine, with the opening ‘Dear Sir, Having unfortunately failed on some former occasions, of fully comprehending the meaning of your expressions... ’. The author was in fact Thomas Young, the eminent polymath, and the letter is printed in his MiscellaneousWorks, edited by Peacock. The need for improved data and amore sophisticated basis for the calculation of premiums was generally recognized. When William Morgan died in 1833, he had been overtaken in his position as the leader of the actuarial profession, but he is rightly remembered as one of the pioneers in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal for the History of Mathematics
British Journal for the History of Mathematics Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
The Loterias Lisbonenses of Francisco Giraldes Barba Thomas Simpson and Dido’s problem Graph theory in America: the first hundred years Mesopotamian square root approximation by a sequence of rectangles Through the looking glass, and what algebra found there: historically informed conceptual metaphors of algebraic substitution and Gaussian elimination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1