2021建筑历史学家协会国际年会“双孢子建筑史”会议报告,魁北克,蒙特利尔

M. Lozanovska, A. Pieris
{"title":"2021建筑历史学家协会国际年会“双孢子建筑史”会议报告,魁北克,蒙特利尔","authors":"M. Lozanovska, A. Pieris","doi":"10.1080/10331867.2022.2093451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “Diasporic Architectural Histories” session presented in April 2021 was organised by Mirjana Lozanovska and Anoma Pieris as part of the SAHANZ selection for the Society of Architectural Historians (SAH) annual conference. Five papers developed for presentation were selected from thirty-five submitted abstracts, the array of abstract submissions by early career and established scholars revealing the escalation of interest in this field of research and its slow but glacial influence on architectural historiography. For many decades, including at the height of identity and cultural theory in the 1980s and 1990s, architectural historiography within colonial settler nations and in Europe appropriated critical theories but remained chal-lenged by the architecture of immigrant communities and unprivileged migration (including forced and economic migration). Except for a few scholars, the subject of migration was largely dismissed partly because such an architecture does not fit into the professional limits of an architect-centred discipline, nor does it fit easily within the scope of vernacular architecture. 1 Two anthologies and two monographs are foundational to the field. 2 Recent minority scholar activisms have advanced earlier foundational platforms of postcolonial theory, Critical Race Theory, Asian American Studies, and Inter-Asian Cultural Studies – lines of diasporic intellectual questioning of colonial and statist racial constructs – into architectural historiography. 3 These efforts continue to dislodge Euro-centred frameworks, but the reluctance of many architectural historians to step out of their expertise areas and perceive the canon as contingent on these worldviews means that an imbalance of knowledge is perpetuated. Diasporic spaces are seen as exceptional rather than integral to our percep-tions of the built environment. At the 2021 SAH conference, sessions pursuing these new terrains included “Transnational histories of","PeriodicalId":42105,"journal":{"name":"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand","volume":"32 1","pages":"312 - 316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Report on the “Diasporic Architectural Histories” Session Held at the 2021 Society of Architectural Historians Annual International Conference, Québec, Montréal\",\"authors\":\"M. Lozanovska, A. Pieris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10331867.2022.2093451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The “Diasporic Architectural Histories” session presented in April 2021 was organised by Mirjana Lozanovska and Anoma Pieris as part of the SAHANZ selection for the Society of Architectural Historians (SAH) annual conference. Five papers developed for presentation were selected from thirty-five submitted abstracts, the array of abstract submissions by early career and established scholars revealing the escalation of interest in this field of research and its slow but glacial influence on architectural historiography. For many decades, including at the height of identity and cultural theory in the 1980s and 1990s, architectural historiography within colonial settler nations and in Europe appropriated critical theories but remained chal-lenged by the architecture of immigrant communities and unprivileged migration (including forced and economic migration). Except for a few scholars, the subject of migration was largely dismissed partly because such an architecture does not fit into the professional limits of an architect-centred discipline, nor does it fit easily within the scope of vernacular architecture. 1 Two anthologies and two monographs are foundational to the field. 2 Recent minority scholar activisms have advanced earlier foundational platforms of postcolonial theory, Critical Race Theory, Asian American Studies, and Inter-Asian Cultural Studies – lines of diasporic intellectual questioning of colonial and statist racial constructs – into architectural historiography. 3 These efforts continue to dislodge Euro-centred frameworks, but the reluctance of many architectural historians to step out of their expertise areas and perceive the canon as contingent on these worldviews means that an imbalance of knowledge is perpetuated. Diasporic spaces are seen as exceptional rather than integral to our percep-tions of the built environment. At the 2021 SAH conference, sessions pursuing these new terrains included “Transnational histories of\",\"PeriodicalId\":42105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"312 - 316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2022.2093451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2022.2093451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年4月举办的“散居建筑历史”会议由Mirjana Lozanovska和Anoma Pieris组织,作为建筑历史学会(SAH)年会的SAHANZ选择的一部分。从35份提交的摘要中选择了5篇论文进行展示,这些摘要由早期职业和知名学者提交,揭示了对这一研究领域的兴趣不断升级,以及它对建筑史学缓慢但缓慢的影响。几十年来,包括在20世纪80年代和90年代的身份和文化理论的高峰时期,殖民定居者国家和欧洲的建筑史学采用了批判理论,但仍然受到移民社区建筑和非特权移民(包括强迫和经济移民)的挑战。除了少数学者之外,移民的主题在很大程度上被忽视了,部分原因是这样的建筑不符合以建筑师为中心的学科的专业限制,也不容易适应乡土建筑的范围。两本选集和两本专著是该领域的基础。最近的少数民族学者活动将早期的后殖民理论、批判种族理论、亚裔美国人研究和亚洲间文化研究的基础平台推进到建筑史学中,这些研究是对殖民和国家主义种族建构的流散知识分子质疑的路线。这些努力继续推翻以欧洲为中心的框架,但许多建筑历史学家不愿走出他们的专业领域,将经典视为这些世界观的偶然因素,这意味着知识的不平衡一直存在。散居空间被视为例外,而不是我们对建筑环境感知的整体。在2021年SAH会议上,探讨这些新领域的会议包括“跨国历史”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Report on the “Diasporic Architectural Histories” Session Held at the 2021 Society of Architectural Historians Annual International Conference, Québec, Montréal
The “Diasporic Architectural Histories” session presented in April 2021 was organised by Mirjana Lozanovska and Anoma Pieris as part of the SAHANZ selection for the Society of Architectural Historians (SAH) annual conference. Five papers developed for presentation were selected from thirty-five submitted abstracts, the array of abstract submissions by early career and established scholars revealing the escalation of interest in this field of research and its slow but glacial influence on architectural historiography. For many decades, including at the height of identity and cultural theory in the 1980s and 1990s, architectural historiography within colonial settler nations and in Europe appropriated critical theories but remained chal-lenged by the architecture of immigrant communities and unprivileged migration (including forced and economic migration). Except for a few scholars, the subject of migration was largely dismissed partly because such an architecture does not fit into the professional limits of an architect-centred discipline, nor does it fit easily within the scope of vernacular architecture. 1 Two anthologies and two monographs are foundational to the field. 2 Recent minority scholar activisms have advanced earlier foundational platforms of postcolonial theory, Critical Race Theory, Asian American Studies, and Inter-Asian Cultural Studies – lines of diasporic intellectual questioning of colonial and statist racial constructs – into architectural historiography. 3 These efforts continue to dislodge Euro-centred frameworks, but the reluctance of many architectural historians to step out of their expertise areas and perceive the canon as contingent on these worldviews means that an imbalance of knowledge is perpetuated. Diasporic spaces are seen as exceptional rather than integral to our percep-tions of the built environment. At the 2021 SAH conference, sessions pursuing these new terrains included “Transnational histories of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
From Hilltop Landmarks to Suburban Place Makers: Brisbane’s Post-War Religious Territories and Communities The Politics of the Visual: Immigrant Architecture in Melbourne’s Tourist Brochures Magnifying the Terrace: David Saunders and the Cross Street Co-Operative Housing Development Form, Function and Monumentality: A Critical Analysis of Jørn Utzon’s Late Work on the Sydney Opera House An Antipodean Attica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1