教学偏好的价值:以高等教育中的个性与学习环境为例

IF 1.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL International Journal of Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2020-10-24 DOI:10.17583/ijep.2020.5634
J. Davies, Thomas L. Wilson
{"title":"教学偏好的价值:以高等教育中的个性与学习环境为例","authors":"J. Davies, Thomas L. Wilson","doi":"10.17583/ijep.2020.5634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve learning outcomes, research evidence has accumulated regarding the principles of teaching and learning; however, students’ perceptions of teaching methods have received little scientific investigation toward enhanced quality of their learning. To provide a demonstration of the value of researching student perceptions of the learning environments in which they find themselves, a sample of preference ratings (n = 69) was examined to test the hypothesis there exist among the Five Factor personality dimensions correlates of preference ratings for three environments: teacher-led, independent-autonomous, and groups.  Results confirmed preference for group learning in our sample and statistically reliable zero-order positive correlations between group-based learning preference and both extraversion and openness scores and between preference for teacher-led environments and openness scores.  First-order correlations showed no significant changes in accounted preference variation when controlling the other personality factors scores.  These findings are discussed with respect to likely social-cognitive and neurodevelopmental bases of group learning effectiveness and the utility of investigating student preferences for improving the quality of learning.","PeriodicalId":44173,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Value of Pedagogical Preferences: A Case of Personality and Learning Environments in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"J. Davies, Thomas L. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.17583/ijep.2020.5634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To improve learning outcomes, research evidence has accumulated regarding the principles of teaching and learning; however, students’ perceptions of teaching methods have received little scientific investigation toward enhanced quality of their learning. To provide a demonstration of the value of researching student perceptions of the learning environments in which they find themselves, a sample of preference ratings (n = 69) was examined to test the hypothesis there exist among the Five Factor personality dimensions correlates of preference ratings for three environments: teacher-led, independent-autonomous, and groups.  Results confirmed preference for group learning in our sample and statistically reliable zero-order positive correlations between group-based learning preference and both extraversion and openness scores and between preference for teacher-led environments and openness scores.  First-order correlations showed no significant changes in accounted preference variation when controlling the other personality factors scores.  These findings are discussed with respect to likely social-cognitive and neurodevelopmental bases of group learning effectiveness and the utility of investigating student preferences for improving the quality of learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2020.5634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2020.5634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了提高学习成果,积累了关于教学原则的研究证据;然而,学生对教学方法的看法很少得到科学的调查,以提高他们的学习质量。为了证明研究学生对他们所处的学习环境的感知的价值,对偏好评级样本(n=69)进行了检验,以检验在教师主导、独立自主和群体三种环境下,五因素人格维度与偏好评级之间存在相关性的假设。结果证实了我们样本中对群体学习的偏好,并且基于群体的学习偏好与外向性和开放性得分之间以及对教师主导的环境的偏好与开放性分数之间存在统计学上可靠的零阶正相关。在控制其他人格因素得分时,一阶相关性显示,所考虑的偏好变化没有显著变化。这些发现是关于群体学习有效性的可能的社会认知和神经发育基础,以及调查学生偏好对提高学习质量的效用进行讨论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Value of Pedagogical Preferences: A Case of Personality and Learning Environments in Higher Education
To improve learning outcomes, research evidence has accumulated regarding the principles of teaching and learning; however, students’ perceptions of teaching methods have received little scientific investigation toward enhanced quality of their learning. To provide a demonstration of the value of researching student perceptions of the learning environments in which they find themselves, a sample of preference ratings (n = 69) was examined to test the hypothesis there exist among the Five Factor personality dimensions correlates of preference ratings for three environments: teacher-led, independent-autonomous, and groups.  Results confirmed preference for group learning in our sample and statistically reliable zero-order positive correlations between group-based learning preference and both extraversion and openness scores and between preference for teacher-led environments and openness scores.  First-order correlations showed no significant changes in accounted preference variation when controlling the other personality factors scores.  These findings are discussed with respect to likely social-cognitive and neurodevelopmental bases of group learning effectiveness and the utility of investigating student preferences for improving the quality of learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bridging Learning Experiences In and Out of School: Students’ Views Student Engagement Variations across Institutions and Disciplines: Findings from Azerbaijan Identity Formation of Pre-Service Teachers. Relations with Training and Attitudes toward Cultural Diversity Moral Values as Mediators in the Relationship between Prosocial Behaviour and Social Responsibility among University Students Growth mindset, Grit, and Academic Self-efficacy as determinants of Academic Performance in Peruvian university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1