质疑司法公正

Pub Date : 2019-09-25 DOI:10.1075/jaic.17026.plu
H. Plug
{"title":"质疑司法公正","authors":"H. Plug","doi":"10.1075/jaic.17026.plu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Impartiality is one of the core values underlying the\n administration of justice. A complaint about a judge’s supposed lack of\n impartiality may be filed on the grounds of the judge’s verbal behavior. In this\n article I will analyze complaints that concern the judge’s use of rhetorical\n questions during court hearings. I will explore what role these complaints may\n play in the strategic maneuvering of a party who seeks the judge’s\n disqualification.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging judicial impartiality\",\"authors\":\"H. Plug\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.17026.plu\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Impartiality is one of the core values underlying the\\n administration of justice. A complaint about a judge’s supposed lack of\\n impartiality may be filed on the grounds of the judge’s verbal behavior. In this\\n article I will analyze complaints that concern the judge’s use of rhetorical\\n questions during court hearings. I will explore what role these complaints may\\n play in the strategic maneuvering of a party who seeks the judge’s\\n disqualification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17026.plu\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17026.plu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公正是司法的核心价值之一。对法官所谓缺乏公正性的投诉可以基于法官的言语行为提出。在这篇文章中,我将分析与法官在庭审中使用修辞问题有关的投诉。我将探讨这些投诉在寻求取消法官资格的一方的战略策略中可能扮演什么角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Challenging judicial impartiality
Impartiality is one of the core values underlying the administration of justice. A complaint about a judge’s supposed lack of impartiality may be filed on the grounds of the judge’s verbal behavior. In this article I will analyze complaints that concern the judge’s use of rhetorical questions during court hearings. I will explore what role these complaints may play in the strategic maneuvering of a party who seeks the judge’s disqualification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1