{"title":"质疑司法公正","authors":"H. Plug","doi":"10.1075/jaic.17026.plu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Impartiality is one of the core values underlying the\n administration of justice. A complaint about a judge’s supposed lack of\n impartiality may be filed on the grounds of the judge’s verbal behavior. In this\n article I will analyze complaints that concern the judge’s use of rhetorical\n questions during court hearings. I will explore what role these complaints may\n play in the strategic maneuvering of a party who seeks the judge’s\n disqualification.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging judicial impartiality\",\"authors\":\"H. Plug\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.17026.plu\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Impartiality is one of the core values underlying the\\n administration of justice. A complaint about a judge’s supposed lack of\\n impartiality may be filed on the grounds of the judge’s verbal behavior. In this\\n article I will analyze complaints that concern the judge’s use of rhetorical\\n questions during court hearings. I will explore what role these complaints may\\n play in the strategic maneuvering of a party who seeks the judge’s\\n disqualification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17026.plu\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17026.plu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impartiality is one of the core values underlying the
administration of justice. A complaint about a judge’s supposed lack of
impartiality may be filed on the grounds of the judge’s verbal behavior. In this
article I will analyze complaints that concern the judge’s use of rhetorical
questions during court hearings. I will explore what role these complaints may
play in the strategic maneuvering of a party who seeks the judge’s
disqualification.