学龄前儿童如何感知危险——一项关于注意力不集中偏见的研究

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL VISUAL COGNITION Pub Date : 2022-05-28 DOI:10.1080/13506285.2022.2086332
Feng Na, Zhang Hui, Wang Nan, Yan Congcong, Ji Qianru
{"title":"学龄前儿童如何感知危险——一项关于注意力不集中偏见的研究","authors":"Feng Na, Zhang Hui, Wang Nan, Yan Congcong, Ji Qianru","doi":"10.1080/13506285.2022.2086332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Harmful threats can sometimes appear unexpectedly in the lives of young children, whose limited experience leads to a greater risk of endangerment. The current study adapted the Variant Odd Ball protocol to explore the effects of threat and familiarity on inattentional blindness (IB). This research evaluated reactions to presentations of evolutionarily relevant images such as millipedes, snakes, escargots, and snails, compared with reactions to evolutionarily irrelevant images such as syringes, knives, flashlights, and spoons. Respondents included three hundred and forty 4–5-year-old preschool children. The findings were as follows: (1) The property of familiarity plays an important role in preschool children’s IB to both evolutionarily relevant and irrelevant images, and highly familiar images were easier to detect than less familiar images; (2) the manipulation of images showed that the threat-relevant stimuli were not more likely to be detected than the non-threat-relevant stimuli; (3) no significant difference was found between the detection rates of evolutionarily relevant and irrelevant images. Preschool children have a lower detection rate of threat-relevant images (e.g., snake, knife) which may reflect their limited experience of danger and weaker integration of these threat-relevant images in the current study.","PeriodicalId":47961,"journal":{"name":"VISUAL COGNITION","volume":"30 1","pages":"305 - 317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How preschoolers perceive danger – A study of inattentional bias\",\"authors\":\"Feng Na, Zhang Hui, Wang Nan, Yan Congcong, Ji Qianru\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13506285.2022.2086332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Harmful threats can sometimes appear unexpectedly in the lives of young children, whose limited experience leads to a greater risk of endangerment. The current study adapted the Variant Odd Ball protocol to explore the effects of threat and familiarity on inattentional blindness (IB). This research evaluated reactions to presentations of evolutionarily relevant images such as millipedes, snakes, escargots, and snails, compared with reactions to evolutionarily irrelevant images such as syringes, knives, flashlights, and spoons. Respondents included three hundred and forty 4–5-year-old preschool children. The findings were as follows: (1) The property of familiarity plays an important role in preschool children’s IB to both evolutionarily relevant and irrelevant images, and highly familiar images were easier to detect than less familiar images; (2) the manipulation of images showed that the threat-relevant stimuli were not more likely to be detected than the non-threat-relevant stimuli; (3) no significant difference was found between the detection rates of evolutionarily relevant and irrelevant images. Preschool children have a lower detection rate of threat-relevant images (e.g., snake, knife) which may reflect their limited experience of danger and weaker integration of these threat-relevant images in the current study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VISUAL COGNITION\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"305 - 317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VISUAL COGNITION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2022.2086332\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VISUAL COGNITION","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2022.2086332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要有害威胁有时会出乎意料地出现在幼儿的生活中,他们有限的经验会导致更大的危害风险。目前的研究采用了变体奇数球方案来探索威胁和熟悉对注意力不集中盲(IB)的影响。这项研究评估了对千足虫、蛇、蜗牛和蜗牛等进化相关图像的反应,并与对注射器、刀、手电筒和勺子等进化无关图像的反应进行了比较。受访者包括3040名4-5岁的学龄前儿童。研究结果如下:(1)熟悉性在学龄前儿童对进化相关和不相关图像的IB中起着重要作用,高度熟悉的图像比不太熟悉的图像更容易检测;(2) 对图像的处理表明,与威胁相关的刺激不比非威胁相关的激励更容易被检测到;(3) 进化相关图像和不相关图像的检测率之间没有显著差异。学龄前儿童对威胁相关图像(如蛇、刀)的检测率较低,这可能反映出他们对危险的体验有限,并且在当前研究中对这些威胁相关图像的整合较弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How preschoolers perceive danger – A study of inattentional bias
ABSTRACT Harmful threats can sometimes appear unexpectedly in the lives of young children, whose limited experience leads to a greater risk of endangerment. The current study adapted the Variant Odd Ball protocol to explore the effects of threat and familiarity on inattentional blindness (IB). This research evaluated reactions to presentations of evolutionarily relevant images such as millipedes, snakes, escargots, and snails, compared with reactions to evolutionarily irrelevant images such as syringes, knives, flashlights, and spoons. Respondents included three hundred and forty 4–5-year-old preschool children. The findings were as follows: (1) The property of familiarity plays an important role in preschool children’s IB to both evolutionarily relevant and irrelevant images, and highly familiar images were easier to detect than less familiar images; (2) the manipulation of images showed that the threat-relevant stimuli were not more likely to be detected than the non-threat-relevant stimuli; (3) no significant difference was found between the detection rates of evolutionarily relevant and irrelevant images. Preschool children have a lower detection rate of threat-relevant images (e.g., snake, knife) which may reflect their limited experience of danger and weaker integration of these threat-relevant images in the current study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VISUAL COGNITION
VISUAL COGNITION PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Visual Cognition publishes new empirical research that increases theoretical understanding of human visual cognition. Studies may be concerned with any aspect of visual cognition such as object, face, and scene recognition; visual attention and search; short-term and long-term visual memory; visual word recognition and reading; eye movement control and active vision; and visual imagery. The journal is devoted to research at the interface of visual perception and cognition and does not typically publish papers in areas of perception or psychophysics that are covered by the many publication outlets for those topics.
期刊最新文献
Auditory distractors are processed but do not interfere with visual search of any difficulty when sound is irrelevant Handling distractor interference in mixed and fixed search Distraction from long-term memory in visual search: Acquired procedural and template-based memory interfere with contextual cueing after target re-location Within-Subject manipulations of proactive control do not change negative templates benefits: Exploring the effect of reward on negative and positive cues No difference in prior representations of what to attend and what to ignore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1