改编《大病对话指南》,以确保文化安全

IF 1.2 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal of Indigenous Health Pub Date : 2020-12-29 DOI:10.32799/IJIH.V16I1.33192
Elizabeth Beddard-Huber, G. Gaspard, Kathleen Yue
{"title":"改编《大病对话指南》,以确保文化安全","authors":"Elizabeth Beddard-Huber, G. Gaspard, Kathleen Yue","doi":"10.32799/IJIH.V16I1.33192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) has been shown to be an effective communication tool used by health care professionals when interacting with patients facing a life-limiting illness. However, Ariadne Labs, the originators of the tool, have not tested it with First Nations and Indigenous Peoples. In this project, the British Columbia Centre for Palliative Care and the First Nations Health Authority in British Columbia (BC), Canada collaborated to adapt the SICG to be more culturally safe for First Nations and Indigenous Peoples. Multiple feedback strategies were employed. Feedback was received from 35 older adults, Elders, and community members from two First Nations communities plus approximately 80 nurses serving in First Nations communities across BC. Key areas of focus for feedback on the clinical tool included setting up the conversation, involving family, closing the conversation, and using principles of health literacy to reduce power differences. Three questions were added in response to feedback received. By creating a safe space for dialogue, it is hoped that health care providers and family members will develop a deeper understanding of what is important to the person with a life-limiting illness. These conversations promote patient-centred health care that aligns with patient values and wishes. Findings from this project directly informed modification of the tool to support a more culturally safe conversation. Further research will inform whether this tool is culturally safe for all seriously ill people. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":54163,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Indigenous Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptations to the Serious Illness Conversation Guide to Be More Culturally Safe\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Beddard-Huber, G. Gaspard, Kathleen Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.32799/IJIH.V16I1.33192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nThe Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) has been shown to be an effective communication tool used by health care professionals when interacting with patients facing a life-limiting illness. However, Ariadne Labs, the originators of the tool, have not tested it with First Nations and Indigenous Peoples. In this project, the British Columbia Centre for Palliative Care and the First Nations Health Authority in British Columbia (BC), Canada collaborated to adapt the SICG to be more culturally safe for First Nations and Indigenous Peoples. Multiple feedback strategies were employed. Feedback was received from 35 older adults, Elders, and community members from two First Nations communities plus approximately 80 nurses serving in First Nations communities across BC. Key areas of focus for feedback on the clinical tool included setting up the conversation, involving family, closing the conversation, and using principles of health literacy to reduce power differences. Three questions were added in response to feedback received. By creating a safe space for dialogue, it is hoped that health care providers and family members will develop a deeper understanding of what is important to the person with a life-limiting illness. These conversations promote patient-centred health care that aligns with patient values and wishes. Findings from this project directly informed modification of the tool to support a more culturally safe conversation. Further research will inform whether this tool is culturally safe for all seriously ill people. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":54163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Indigenous Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Indigenous Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32799/IJIH.V16I1.33192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Indigenous Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32799/IJIH.V16I1.33192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

《严重疾病对话指南》(SICG)已被证明是医疗保健专业人员在与面临限制生命疾病的患者互动时使用的有效沟通工具。然而,该工具的创始人Ariadne实验室尚未在原住民和原住民中进行测试。在该项目中,不列颠哥伦比亚省姑息治疗中心和加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省原住民卫生局合作,调整SICG,使其在文化上对原住民和土著人民更加安全。采用了多种反馈策略。收到了来自两个原住民社区的35名老年人、老年人和社区成员以及在不列颠哥伦比亚省原住民社区服务的大约80名护士的反馈。对临床工具进行反馈的关键领域包括建立对话、让家人参与、结束对话,以及使用健康素养原则来减少权力差异。针对收到的反馈意见,增加了三个问题。通过创造一个安全的对话空间,希望医疗保健提供者和家庭成员能够更深入地了解什么对患有限制生命疾病的人来说是重要的。这些对话促进以患者为中心的医疗保健,符合患者的价值观和愿望。该项目的研究结果直接为工具的修改提供了信息,以支持更安全的文化对话。进一步的研究将告知这种工具在文化上是否对所有重病患者都是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adaptations to the Serious Illness Conversation Guide to Be More Culturally Safe
The Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) has been shown to be an effective communication tool used by health care professionals when interacting with patients facing a life-limiting illness. However, Ariadne Labs, the originators of the tool, have not tested it with First Nations and Indigenous Peoples. In this project, the British Columbia Centre for Palliative Care and the First Nations Health Authority in British Columbia (BC), Canada collaborated to adapt the SICG to be more culturally safe for First Nations and Indigenous Peoples. Multiple feedback strategies were employed. Feedback was received from 35 older adults, Elders, and community members from two First Nations communities plus approximately 80 nurses serving in First Nations communities across BC. Key areas of focus for feedback on the clinical tool included setting up the conversation, involving family, closing the conversation, and using principles of health literacy to reduce power differences. Three questions were added in response to feedback received. By creating a safe space for dialogue, it is hoped that health care providers and family members will develop a deeper understanding of what is important to the person with a life-limiting illness. These conversations promote patient-centred health care that aligns with patient values and wishes. Findings from this project directly informed modification of the tool to support a more culturally safe conversation. Further research will inform whether this tool is culturally safe for all seriously ill people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Indigenous Health
International Journal of Indigenous Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Development of the Indigenous Health Toolkit Strength-Based approaches to providing an Aboriginal Community Child Health Service Culture, Health and Wellbeing: Yarning with the Victorian Indigenous community You Belong to Everyone Meaningful Positioning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1