社会创新工作的卫生问题:“社会”与“经济”的可逆性与振荡

IF 0.6 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropology of Work Review Pub Date : 2021-07-31 DOI:10.1111/awr.12218
Nanna Søvsø Mikkelsen, Kasper Tang Vangkilde
{"title":"社会创新工作的卫生问题:“社会”与“经济”的可逆性与振荡","authors":"Nanna Søvsø Mikkelsen,&nbsp;Kasper Tang Vangkilde","doi":"10.1111/awr.12218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, social innovation has received attention as a promising solution to societal challenges, not least because of its claims to create a symbiosis between social purposes and economic benefits. The often uneasy relation between social values and economic values is, however, not easily resolved in practice. Based on ethnographic research in the field of social innovation in Denmark, we argue that the relation between “the social” and “the economic,” representing different value logics, is essentially one of reversibility. The two each encompass their apparent opposite within themselves. This reversible relation elicits a number of challenging oscillations when social innovation is enacted in practice. We term this the hygienic problem of social innovation work. Too much or too little of either the social or the economic contaminates and obfuscates the endeavor of social innovation. As a result, people who do social innovation work seek to enact the “right” or “pure” relation between social and economic concerns. We suggest, however, that the potential of social innovation lies not in this search for purity. Rather, the instability of these categories prompts a continual exploration and creative rethinking of how the intersection of society and business may unfold.</p>","PeriodicalId":43035,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology of Work Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/awr.12218","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Hygienic Problem of Social Innovation Work: Reversibility and Oscillations between “the Social” and “the Economic”\",\"authors\":\"Nanna Søvsø Mikkelsen,&nbsp;Kasper Tang Vangkilde\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/awr.12218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent years, social innovation has received attention as a promising solution to societal challenges, not least because of its claims to create a symbiosis between social purposes and economic benefits. The often uneasy relation between social values and economic values is, however, not easily resolved in practice. Based on ethnographic research in the field of social innovation in Denmark, we argue that the relation between “the social” and “the economic,” representing different value logics, is essentially one of reversibility. The two each encompass their apparent opposite within themselves. This reversible relation elicits a number of challenging oscillations when social innovation is enacted in practice. We term this the hygienic problem of social innovation work. Too much or too little of either the social or the economic contaminates and obfuscates the endeavor of social innovation. As a result, people who do social innovation work seek to enact the “right” or “pure” relation between social and economic concerns. We suggest, however, that the potential of social innovation lies not in this search for purity. Rather, the instability of these categories prompts a continual exploration and creative rethinking of how the intersection of society and business may unfold.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology of Work Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/awr.12218\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology of Work Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/awr.12218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology of Work Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/awr.12218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,社会创新作为解决社会挑战的一种有希望的解决方案受到了关注,尤其是因为它声称在社会目的和经济效益之间创造了一种共生关系。然而,社会价值和经济价值之间往往令人不安的关系在实践中并不容易解决。基于丹麦社会创新领域的民族志研究,我们认为代表不同价值逻辑的“社会”与“经济”之间的关系本质上是一种可逆性关系。这两者都包含了它们表面上的对立面。当社会创新在实践中实施时,这种可逆关系引发了许多具有挑战性的振荡。我们称之为社会创新工作的卫生问题。过多或过少的社会或经济因素都会污染和混淆社会创新的努力。因此,从事社会创新工作的人寻求在社会和经济关切之间建立“正确”或“纯粹”的关系。然而,我们认为,社会创新的潜力并不在于对纯粹性的追求。相反,这些类别的不稳定性促使人们不断探索和创造性地重新思考社会和商业的交集将如何展开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Hygienic Problem of Social Innovation Work: Reversibility and Oscillations between “the Social” and “the Economic”

In recent years, social innovation has received attention as a promising solution to societal challenges, not least because of its claims to create a symbiosis between social purposes and economic benefits. The often uneasy relation between social values and economic values is, however, not easily resolved in practice. Based on ethnographic research in the field of social innovation in Denmark, we argue that the relation between “the social” and “the economic,” representing different value logics, is essentially one of reversibility. The two each encompass their apparent opposite within themselves. This reversible relation elicits a number of challenging oscillations when social innovation is enacted in practice. We term this the hygienic problem of social innovation work. Too much or too little of either the social or the economic contaminates and obfuscates the endeavor of social innovation. As a result, people who do social innovation work seek to enact the “right” or “pure” relation between social and economic concerns. We suggest, however, that the potential of social innovation lies not in this search for purity. Rather, the instability of these categories prompts a continual exploration and creative rethinking of how the intersection of society and business may unfold.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Bloodwork: Circulatory Disorders, Immunity, and the Scarring of Systems Introduction to the Special Issue: Immunocapital and Capitalist Immunities Who Gets to Be an Author? “Everyone Wants to Feel Like a Movie Star”: Aesthetics, Work, Pleasure, and Caste in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1